Oppose

I respectfully submit comment in opposition to the proposed 2022Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools (the “2022 Model Policies”). These policies are not only in direct violation of state and federal law, but they also deny the rights of students, parents, and school personnel to recognize the inherent dignity and worth of every child. All children have the right to learn in a safe and supportive environment that respects their humanity and upholds their dignity. However, the 2022 Model Policies send a dangerous message that some students do not belong, and in fact, should not exist.Discovering oneself is an important part of growing up, and every child deserves to have support and guidance as they learn about themselves, their family and friends, and their place in the world.Studies have consistently shown that policies like those proposed result in more frequent and escalating harassment, discrimination, and physical violence toward trans and nonbinary students.These policies also lead to significantly higher rates of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts relative to cisgender students. The consistent misgendering of a student has a profoundlynegative impact on their ability to learn in the classroom.Contrary to what is recommended in the proposed model policies, consistent use of a student’s affirmed name can reduce suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Furthermore, denying trans and nonbinary students from using facilities that match their gender identity increases the prevalence of sexual assault victimization. The evidence is clear – students will experience higher rates of sexual assault, peer victimization, and suicide if policies like these areadopted in Virginia.I recognize that sexual and domestic violence is linked to other forms of harm and that supporting equality and respect for ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, is integral to creating a Virginia free from sexual and domestic violence.The 2022 Model Policies will significantly and irreparably harm Virginia’s students and families and as antiviolence advocates; we firmly oppose their adoption.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I respectfully submit comment in opposition to the proposed 2022\nModel Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools (the “2022 Model Policies”). These policies are not only in direct violation of state and federal law, but they also deny the rights of students, parents, and school personnel to recognize the inherent dignity and worth of every child. All children have the right to learn in a safe and supportive environment that respects their humanity and upholds their dignity. However, the 2022 Model Policies send a dangerous message that some students do not belong, and in fact, should not exist.\nDiscovering oneself is an important part of growing up, and every child deserves to have support and guidance as they learn about themselves, their family and friends, and their place in the world.\nStudies have consistently shown that policies like those proposed result in more frequent and escalating harassment, discrimination, and physical violence toward trans and nonbinary students.\nThese policies also lead to significantly higher rates of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts relative to cisgender students. The consistent misgendering of a student has a profoundly\nnegative impact on their ability to learn in the classroom.\nContrary to what is recommended in the proposed model policies, consistent use of a student’s affirmed name can reduce suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Furthermore, denying trans and nonbinary students from using facilities that match their gender identity increases the prevalence of sexual assault victimization. The evidence is clear – students will experience higher rates of sexual assault, peer victimization, and suicide if policies like these are\nadopted in Virginia.\nI  recognize that sexual and domestic violence is linked to other forms of harm and that supporting equality and respect for ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, is integral to creating a Virginia free from sexual and domestic violence.\nThe 2022 Model Policies will significantly and irreparably harm Virginia’s students and families and as antiviolence advocates; we firmly oppose their adoption."}'>I respectfully submit comment in opposition to the proposed 2022
Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools (the “2022 Model Policies”). These policies are not only in direct violation of state and federal law, but they also deny the rights of students, parents, and school personnel to recognize the inherent dignity and worth of every child. All children have the right to learn in a safe and supportive environment that respects their humanity and upholds their dignity. However, the 2022 Model Policies send a dangerous message that some students do not belong, and in fact, should not exist.
Discovering oneself is an important part of growing up, and every child deserves to have support and guidance as they learn about themselves, their family and friends, and their place in the world.
Studies have consistently shown that policies like those proposed result in more frequent and escalating harassment, discrimination, and physical violence toward trans and nonbinary students.
These policies also lead to significantly higher rates of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts relative to cisgender students. The consistent misgendering of a student has a profoundly
negative impact on their ability to learn in the classroom.
Contrary to what is recommended in the proposed model policies, consistent use of a student’s affirmed name can reduce suicidal behavior and suicidal ideation. Furthermore, denying trans and nonbinary students from using facilities that match their gender identity increases the prevalence of sexual assault victimization. The evidence is clear – students will experience higher rates of sexual assault, peer victimization, and suicide if policies like these are
adopted in Virginia.
I recognize that sexual and domestic violence is linked to other forms of harm and that supporting equality and respect for ALL people, regardless of sexual orientation, gender identity, or gender expression, is integral to creating a Virginia free from sexual and domestic violence.
The 2022 Model Policies will significantly and irreparably harm Virginia’s students and families and as antiviolence advocates; we firmly oppose their adoption.


Oppose!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>These proposed model policies are contrary to state law and will be extremely harmful to transgender and nonbinary kids. Protect trans and nonbinary kids. RESCIND these model policies. </p>


Governors model policy for transgender students

<!DOCTYPE html>

I 100% support Gov. Youngkins policy.


VDOE must reject the 2022 draft policy

I'm a concerned community member as well as the parent of a K-12 public school student and I oppose the 2022 proposed model policy regarding the treatment of transgender and non-binary youth in Virginia schools.Trans-affirming school policy matters to me because I believe in a safe and inclusive school environment for all youth. Schools especially need to have protections in place for marginalized and hence vulnerable LGBQT students.Trans and non-binary youth are entitled to be free from bulllying, harassment, and discrimination at the hands of their peers, teachers, and school staff and administrators. All youth, including trans and non-binary youth, should have access to an equal educational experience.The lack of such protections are strongly likely to result in more bullying and attacks toward trans and non-binary students. Furthermore, an unsafe school environment is more likely to negatively impact the mental health of trans and non-binary students.Research shows that LGBTQ youth who had access to an LGBTQ-affirming school reported lower rates of attempting suicide than those who did not. Additionally, learning about LGBTQ people or issues was associated with significantly lower odds of a past-year suicide attempt in LGBTQ students.To reiterate, I vehemently oppose the 2022 draft policies and want the VDOE to reject them.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I'm a concerned community member as well as the parent of a K-12 public school student and I oppose the 2022 proposed model policy regarding the treatment of transgender and non-binary youth in Virginia schools.\n\nTrans-affirming school policy matters to me because I believe in a safe and inclusive school environment for all youth. Schools especially need to have protections in place for marginalized and hence vulnerable LGBQT students.\n\nTrans and non-binary youth are entitled to be free from bulllying, harassment, and discrimination at the hands of their peers, teachers, and school staff and administrators. All youth, including trans and non-binary youth, should have access to an equal educational experience.\n\nThe lack of such protections are strongly likely to result in more bullying and attacks toward trans and non-binary students. Furthermore, an unsafe school environment is more likely to negatively impact the mental health of trans and non-binary students.\n\nResearch shows that LGBTQ youth who had access to an LGBTQ-affirming school reported lower rates of attempting suicide than those who did not. Additionally, learning about LGBTQ people or issues was associated with significantly lower odds of a past-year suicide attempt in LGBTQ students.\n\nTo reiterate, I vehemently oppose the 2022 draft policies and want the VDOE to reject them."}">I'm a concerned community member as well as the parent of a K-12 public school student and I oppose the 2022 proposed model policy regarding the treatment of transgender and non-binary youth in Virginia schools.

Trans-affirming school policy matters to me because I believe in a safe and inclusive school environment for all youth. Schools especially need to have protections in place for marginalized and hence vulnerable LGBQT students.

Trans and non-binary youth are entitled to be free from bulllying, harassment, and discrimination at the hands of their peers, teachers, and school staff and administrators. All youth, including trans and non-binary youth, should have access to an equal educational experience.

The lack of such protections are strongly likely to result in more bullying and attacks toward trans and non-binary students. Furthermore, an unsafe school environment is more likely to negatively impact the mental health of trans and non-binary students.

Research shows that LGBTQ youth who had access to an LGBTQ-affirming school reported lower rates of attempting suicide than those who did not. Additionally, learning about LGBTQ people or issues was associated with significantly lower odds of a past-year suicide attempt in LGBTQ students.

To reiterate, I vehemently oppose the 2022 draft policies and want the VDOE to reject them.


Opposition to proposed policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the proposed policy—as a Christian, I believe that all human beings have a right to dignity, support, and love, and the proposed policy would strip all of those things away from children across the state. If the government is to be involved in this issue at all, it should be to provide a safe, loving environment for everyone. This proposed policy would do the opposite.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I am against the new transgender policies that Youngkin is implementing. I am tired of the LGBT population, and particularly transgender citizens, being the forefront of Republican attacks on human decency, equality, and fairness. Yes, everyone deserves to have an opinion, but that equally means respecting the rights of transgender students to feel comfortable as they are and comfortable to express themselves. Republicans always target transgender people as a wedge issue to win votes, and it often works. But it's shameful that in 2022 in Virginia, we are constantly having to stand up to unfair attacks on one segment of the population. Undoubtedly, the governor is using this issue for his Presidential aspirations as he travels the country and ignores Virginians. This policy needs to be reverted back to the fair one of the Northam administration and stop, once and for all, the constant attacks on transgender people specifically and the LGBT population at large."}">I am against the new transgender policies that Youngkin is implementing. I am tired of the LGBT population, and particularly transgender citizens, being the forefront of Republican attacks on human decency, equality, and fairness. Yes, everyone deserves to have an opinion, but that equally means respecting the rights of transgender students to feel comfortable as they are and comfortable to express themselves. Republicans always target transgender people as a wedge issue to win votes, and it often works. But it's shameful that in 2022 in Virginia, we are constantly having to stand up to unfair attacks on one segment of the population. Undoubtedly, the governor is using this issue for his Presidential aspirations as he travels the country and ignores Virginians. This policy needs to be reverted back to the fair one of the Northam administration and stop, once and for all, the constant attacks on transgender people specifically and the LGBT population at large.


God Loves Us All...

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I am a teacher and a Christian, and I am appalled at the idea that our state would remove protections from our population's most vulnerable individuals.  As an educator in a public school, I see the struggle that trans youth face on a day to day basis.  It's a sad day when government stops protecting its people, especially ones who are marginalized.  Please, please put back the protections that trans youth need."}">I am a teacher and a Christian, and I am appalled at the idea that our state would remove protections from our population's most vulnerable individuals. As an educator in a public school, I see the struggle that trans youth face on a day to day basis. It's a sad day when government stops protecting its people, especially ones who are marginalized. Please, please put back the protections that trans youth need.


Enough of the Transphobia

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the guidance. Please, enough of the transphobia. Transgender people don't have the desire, or the power, to hurt anyone. Let them live life as normally as possible.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans and Non-Binary students deserve support. Youngkin’s policy would only hurt them.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Gender identity is different than sexual identity. Kids express gender identity as young as 12 months to 4 years. We oppose any legislation that subjects a high risk group to further harm. We love and support trans people, especially trans kids. Get educated!!! Don't hate children!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I would just like to say this, Youngkin and others with his ideals need to ask themselves, how Christ like are they to be like they are towards people. I guess they forget about how love and unity is said throughout the Bible. It's not right to treat anyone with disrespect and malice. I've asked it many of times and I'll ask it again, but is it true that this country is \"the land of the free\"? If that's the case, let people live free and don't tread on them."}">I would just like to say this, Youngkin and others with his ideals need to ask themselves, how Christ like are they to be like they are towards people. I guess they forget about how love and unity is said throughout the Bible. It's not right to treat anyone with disrespect and malice. I've asked it many of times and I'll ask it again, but is it true that this country is "the land of the free"? If that's the case, let people live free and don't tread on them.


Do not agree - Policy needs more specificity to protect transgender children's safety

<!DOCTYPE html>

The sample policy lacks enough specifics for a consistent transgender policy. for school districts. The policy should specifically include the following:

Parents need to supply a written statement to the school that outlines the students preferred name and pronouns. A birth certificate, legal document or doctor's statement is not necessary.

If a child believes a parent or guardian will become physically or mentally abusive to them if one of their parents or guardian becomes aware of their desire to change their name or request  treatment for gender dysphoria, Social Services should be contacted. The school will be required to abide by the Social Services recommendation.

Schools must provide a gender neutral restroom and locker room changing area for transgender children.

Teachers must be required to address students by the name and pronouns the parent and student choose.


Support trans kids (and adults)

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Transgender people are PEOPLE deserving of all the same rights and respect due to any American of any gender. I had a transgender young man stay with me for several months. He was homeless because his parents had rejected him because of his gender. This remarkable young man maintained a straight A average in college while living in a homeless shelter and in friends’ apartments. He is now getting a graduate degree. But one shouldn’t have to be remarkable to be respected for who one knows oneself to be. One shouldn’t have to feel unsafe going about one’s life. One shouldn’t be made to feel less than or weird. This young man feels uncomfortable going out because people are so rude about checking out his body and whispering. Let’s appreciate that no two humans are alike and learn to respect each other. Transgender, great! Unkind, despicable! Politicians who pander to our worst impulses, dangerous!!"}'>Transgender people are PEOPLE deserving of all the same rights and respect due to any American of any gender. I had a transgender young man stay with me for several months. He was homeless because his parents had rejected him because of his gender. This remarkable young man maintained a straight A average in college while living in a homeless shelter and in friends’ apartments. He is now getting a graduate degree. But one shouldn’t have to be remarkable to be respected for who one knows oneself to be. One shouldn’t have to feel unsafe going about one’s life. One shouldn’t be made to feel less than or weird. This young man feels uncomfortable going out because people are so rude about checking out his body and whispering. Let’s appreciate that no two humans are alike and learn to respect each other. Transgender, great! Unkind, despicable! Politicians who pander to our worst impulses, dangerous!!


Proposed changes being considered by VDOE regarding guidelines for our youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>As a grandmother of a nonbinary individual  I ask you to reject the draft model policy that has submitted by Governor Glenn Youngkin to replace the 2021 model policy on the treatment of transgender and nonbinary youth in our schools.  Please protect our youth. </p>


I OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

I STRONGLY OPPOSE this guidance. This bill does not help youth, it actively harms them. Forcing youth to adhere to a completely wrong and uneducated belief held by some is dangerous and will have detrimental consequences. You cannot be in favor of "protecting our children" while actively not protecting all children. This bill protects no one and only causes harms.


Protect Trans Youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

We should be protecting our trans students and providing support and resources for them, instead of excluding them.


STRONGLY OPPOSE 100%! SUPPORT & PROTECT TRANS KIDS!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly OPPOSE the new guidelines regarding transgender students. Not every child has the love and support of parents who accept them for who they truly are rather than the person they were “expected” to be. Thankfully teachers are there to help fill that support system gap, creating a safe environment for our kids to grow and thrive. These new guidelines are discriminatory and are a blatant violation of our children’s rights. Students should be free to use the pronouns and names that match their gender identity and deserve to have full access to facilities and services that correspond with their gender identity, just like any other student…and without prior written authorization from their parents. I strongly urge the department to reconsider this policy and to protect the rights and well-being of all our transgender students.


STRONGLY OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose to this. Protect trans kids.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the model policy. While I am cisgender myself, I have numerous family members, friends, and loved ones who are transgender and nonbinary. The draft model policy is rooted in transphobia and will cause further harm to numerous transgender and nonbinary children, who are already at an extremely difficult time of life.


Oppose

I OPPOSE Governor Youngkin's draft student policy that takes away the 2021 protections and equality for trans and non-binary students. I want the VDOE to reject Youngkin's policy.There are several middle and high school students in my church that are trans and non-binary. They have felt supported by our church community to express their gender identity openly and they have been a gift to all of us with their honesty and courage. I believe Youngkin's draft policy is backwards, based in fear and ignorance.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I OPPOSE Governor Youngkin's draft student policy that takes away the 2021 protections and equality for trans and non-binary students.  I want the VDOE to reject Youngkin's policy.\nThere are several middle and high school students in my church that are trans and non-binary.  They have felt supported by our church community to express their gender identity openly and they have been a gift to all of us with their honesty and courage.   I believe Youngkin's draft policy is backwards, based in fear and ignorance.   "}">I OPPOSE Governor Youngkin's draft student policy that takes away the 2021 protections and equality for trans and non-binary students. I want the VDOE to reject Youngkin's policy.
There are several middle and high school students in my church that are trans and non-binary. They have felt supported by our church community to express their gender identity openly and they have been a gift to all of us with their honesty and courage. I believe Youngkin's draft policy is backwards, based in fear and ignorance.


Protect Emotionally Vulnerable Children and Parental Rights!

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Will Pacheco
7604 Rudyard St
Falls Church, VA 22043

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Will Pacheco
<br />7604 Rudyard St<br />Falls Church, VA 22043<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148814995" width="1" height="1" />


UTTERLY OPPOSED

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I'm an intersex and transgender woman. In my mid-teens, my parental units found my journals in which I had written about my body being different, my sexual orientation, my gender identity, and similar things. For the next 4 years, they subjected me to every type of child abuse. I will not go into specifics, but had that house been forensically analyzed back then, it would likely have been deemed some sort of torture chamber. In addition to this, I was cut off from friends and relatives. I was homeschooled, alienated from the world, and cut off from being able to get help. At age 18, they kicked me out on the streets to fend for myself. I still suffer with CPTSD from what they did to me. I was unable to start being my authentic self until I was 34, and it nearly cost me life, and it was because of homophobic and transphobic adults in my life during my childhood. I literally had no safe space to be myself. The proposed policies will affect LGBT children in Virginia in that same way, especially trans kids. This is unacceptable for any society in 2022. Children owe their parents nothing. Children are allowed to have, and should have, privacy and safe spaces outside of their parents. If parents want their children to involve them in life, it is the responsibility of parents to make their children feel loved enough, accepted enough, and safe enough for that to happen. I oppose the proposed policies in the absolute strongest of terms. Children deserve better than this.   </p>


Humanity

It is wonderful to see that Virginia is adopting policies aimed at creating a school "environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying." I am very glad to see that the 2022 Model Policies include "accommodat[ing] students with distinctive needs, including any student with a persistent and sincere belief that his or her gender differs from his or her sex."My apologies for a lengthy comment, but I will put the core ideas immediately, first. Namely:*Obliging teachers and other school staff to call students by a name or pronouns contrary to how they identify (e.g. because that is what aligns with official records) is harassment and bullying. It does lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interests of students.*Outing students to their parents and otherwise coordinating with parents who may be abusively unsupportive (transphobic, etc.) is harassment and bullying. It does lead and will lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interest of students. Students are people, and parental rights must not be seen as all-encompassing. Students, even when under the age of 18, have human rights.*Discriminating against a student based on whether they are trans or not is discrimination. It can be easy to hide behind the idea that “segregation of sports teams, bathrooms, etc., according to sex is not discrimination,” but the issue is not whether it’s okay to have boys’ locker rooms and girls’ locker rooms. The issue is whether it is okay to tell some girls they must be treated differently than the other girls. We do not segregate the Black girls from the White girls, the red-headed girls from the blonde girls, the lesbians from the straight girls, and we should not segregate the trans girls from the cis girls. That would be discrimination, and it’s not right.Now, to get into it:Coordinating with parents is a wonderful thing, especially when those parents are supportive of a student's gender identity and/or transition. Virginia must not be like Texas or other states where parents doing the right thing to support their children is being treated like child abuse. I am concerned, however, about statements like "Parents have the right to make decisions with respect to their children" and "Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs" which do not seem to account at all for children's rights to their own identities and their own decisions, or for the tragically all too common case of parents who are abusively unsupportive of their child's gender identity or transition. Coordinating with parents to support a child's identity (incl. name, pronouns, which gender-segregated activities they participate in) is important and valuable, just the same as coordinating with parents to address a child's medical issues. A school would not deny a child accommodations for an insulin pump or inhaler, or a need to visit the school nurse once a day to receive medication, or whatever it may be - a school would not go out of its way to intentionally do physical (medical) harm to a student, regardless of a parent's wishes, and so just the same, a school should not go out of its way to do harm to a student when it comes to mental health, regardless of outdated, damaging, conservative beliefs about parental rights or religious freedom. A school should not "out" students to their parents, and should not coordinate with parents to abuse their children, to push them into frighteningly serious depression, anxiety, or mental health circumstances otherwise, in the name of “parental rights.” The well-being of the child, and considerations for the rights of the child themselves as human beings, as individuals, as US citizens, must come first, ahead of privileging parents’ rights to do as they wish.Turning to section VI, The First Amendment of the United States Constitution: Forbids government actors from requiring individuals, including children in public schools, to adhere to or adopt particular ideological beliefs. Yes, indeed. And it is precisely for this reason that schools must not require individuals, including children, to adhere to or adopt anyone’s conservative and/or religious beliefs regarding sexual orientation or gender. Beliefs that there are only two genders, that “gender” isn’t real and only biological sex is, beliefs that one can never change one’s gender, that trans identities aren’t real, all of these are beliefs, they are ideologies. And they should not be imposed upon students, plain and simple. “Schools may not abrogate the rights of parents.” Just as these Model Policies indicate, ““[i]f the student has indicated that the reason for being at imminent risk of suicide relates to parental abuse or neglect, this contact shall not be made with the parent.” I would very much hope that language can be inserted into these Model Policies to clearly and explicitly indicate that this applies to gender identity as well. Parents who are contributing to a student’s depression, anxiety, trauma, etc. by denying them their gender identity, by forcing them to live according to a gender identity that is not their own, by forcing them to conform to homophobic or transphobic beliefs (even if in the name of religion), must not be contacted or coordinated with when it comes to such circumstances of mental health wellness. No matter how many times one may assert the notion of “parents’ rights,” it is well-established that there are things that cross the line into child abuse. Schools must not aid and abet abusive parents in harming their children by denying them their identities (e.g. forcing them to be treated as a boy instead of as a girl).I note a number of lines here about the rights of parents to inspect curricula and educational materials otherwise. I am thankful to see that these Model Policies do not explicitly endorse or implement the bizarrely misguided notion that anything and everything LGBT is somehow inherently “sexual” and therefore inappropriate for students. As is common sense, a homosexual relationship is no more sexual inherently than a heterosexual relationship, and a human being wearing a skirt or dress or makeup or long hair, also, does not suddenly become something sexual in character just because the person wearing it is of a different biological sex. Allowing parents to inspect or be aware of educational content is fine – and, of course, as taxpayers and citizens they should have a right to know what’s being taught in public schools. But I hope that no elements will be added to these Model Policies to openly encourage, let alone oblige, schools to bend to the whim of individual parents (or administrators, school board members, etc.) who wish to impose their personal conservative and/or religious views on everyone else, including for example, misguided views about what is and isn’t “sexual” in nature.Item 22 of this section, at the top of page 10, indicates that “Neither the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title IX, nor the Virginia Human Rights Act require school divisions to allow students of one biological sex to participate on sports teams reserved for members of the other biological sex.” I would think it advisable to insert language also just as clearly indicating that none of these laws, policies, or constitutional amendments require schools to categorize students by sex rather than by gender, or require them to have to segregate school sports (or anything else) according to sex rather than gender. Schools should be free to change with the times, and to do what is best for their students, by not denying trans athletes the freedom their cisgender classmates enjoy, to play sports and engage in other activities in a way concordant with who they are.Moving down to page 16: The section on identification of students runs directly counter to the idea, expressed at the very top of the document, that “All students have the right to attend school in an environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying.”Obliging school personnel to refer to students only by the names or nicknames in their official records, and only by the pronouns associated with their legal sex, is bullying. It is harassment. Plain and simple. I don’t understand why this gets so often completely overlooked, but these are children. People in the prime of their life, a particularly exciting and important but also vulnerable time in their life, the one and only time they will get to be children/teenagers, get to be middle-school or high-school (or elementary school) students. No one should have to suffer through years of being called “he” or “she” (rather than the other way around), or “Robert” instead of “Emily,” or whatever it may be, day in and day out, for the entirety of their teenage years, just because that’s what’s written on the records. The Model Policies indicate in several places that bullying cannot be tolerated. And yet, having teachers, school administrative staff, and others insist on calling Emily “Robert” or calling her “he,” enables and encourages bullying, rather directly. Conversely, it is when teachers and other adults support a student’s identity – for example, by referring to Emily as Emily, and as “she” and as one of the girls in the class (regardless of whether the official records say “Robert” or “M”) – that they can set a strong model that bullying will not be tolerated in their school.Item 6 in this section, indicating that “[School Division] shall not compel [School Division] personnel or other students to address or refer to students in any manner that would violate their constitutionally protected rights,” runs directly counter to the preceding items in the list. If a teacher wishes to exercise their First Amendment rights, their freedom of speech, to support a student, by calling them the correct name and pronouns – regardless of what’s in the record, and regardless of what a transphobic or unsupportive parent has or hasn’t put in writing – they should have that First Amendment right to do so. The school must not oblige them to do otherwise, e.g. by “only” using the correct name and pronouns only when parents have put something in writing.I hope that you will reconsider various elements of these proposed policies, and will search your hearts and do the right thing to make things better, truly supportive, truly free of harassment and bullying and discrimination, for all students – including trans students.Thank you for your consideration.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"It is wonderful to see that Virginia is adopting policies aimed at creating a school \"environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying.\" I am very glad to see that the 2022 Model Policies include \"accommodat[ing] students with distinctive needs, including any student with a persistent and sincere belief that his or her gender differs from his or her sex.\"\nMy apologies for a lengthy comment, but I will put the core ideas immediately, first. Namely:\n\n*Obliging teachers and other school staff to call students by a name or pronouns contrary to how they identify (e.g. because that is what aligns with official records) is harassment and bullying. It does lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interests of students.\n\n*Outing students to their parents and otherwise coordinating with parents who may be abusively unsupportive (transphobic, etc.) is harassment and bullying. It does lead and will lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interest of students. Students are people, and parental rights must not be seen as all-encompassing. Students, even when under the age of 18, have human rights.\n*Discriminating against a student based on whether they are trans or not is discrimination. It can be easy to hide behind the idea that “segregation of sports teams, bathrooms, etc., according to sex is not discrimination,” but the issue is not whether it’s okay to have boys’ locker rooms and girls’ locker rooms. The issue is whether it is okay to tell some girls they must be treated differently than the other girls. We do not segregate the Black girls from the White girls, the red-headed girls from the blonde girls, the lesbians from the straight girls, and we should not segregate the trans girls from the cis girls. That would be discrimination, and it’s not right.\nNow, to get into it:\nCoordinating with parents is a wonderful thing, especially when those parents are supportive of a student's gender identity and/or transition. Virginia must not be like Texas or other states where parents doing the right thing to support their children is being treated like child abuse. I am concerned, however, about statements like \"Parents have the right to make decisions with respect to their children\" and \"Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs\" which do not seem to account at all for children's rights to their own identities and their own decisions, or for the tragically all too common case of parents who are abusively unsupportive of their child's gender identity or transition. \nCoordinating with parents to support a child's identity (incl. name, pronouns, which gender-segregated activities they participate in) is important and valuable, just the same as coordinating with parents to address a child's medical issues. A school would not deny a child accommodations for an insulin pump or inhaler, or a need to visit the school nurse once a day to receive medication, or whatever it may be - a school would not go out of its way to intentionally do physical (medical) harm to a student, regardless of a parent's wishes, and so just the same, a school should not go out of its way to do harm to a student when it comes to mental health, regardless of outdated, damaging, conservative beliefs about parental rights or religious freedom. A school should not \"out\" students to their parents, and should not coordinate with parents to abuse their children, to push them into frighteningly serious depression, anxiety, or mental health circumstances otherwise, in the name of “parental rights.” The well-being of the child, and considerations for the rights of the child themselves as human beings, as individuals, as US citizens, must come first, ahead of privileging parents’ rights to do as they wish.\n\nTurning to section VI, \n\nThe First Amendment of the United States Constitution: Forbids government actors from requiring individuals, including children in public schools, to adhere to or adopt particular ideological beliefs. \n\nYes, indeed. And it is precisely for this reason that schools must not require individuals, including children, to adhere to or adopt anyone’s conservative and/or religious beliefs regarding sexual orientation or gender. Beliefs that there are only two genders, that “gender” isn’t real and only biological sex is, beliefs that one can never change one’s gender, that trans identities aren’t real, all of these are beliefs, they are ideologies. And they should not be imposed upon students, plain and simple. \n\n“Schools may not abrogate the rights of parents.” Just as these Model Policies indicate, ““[i]f the student has indicated that the reason for being at imminent risk of suicide relates to parental abuse or neglect, this contact shall not be made with the parent.” I would very much hope that language can be inserted into these Model Policies to clearly and explicitly indicate that this applies to gender identity as well. Parents who are contributing to a student’s depression, anxiety, trauma, etc. by denying them their gender identity, by forcing them to live according to a gender identity that is not their own, by forcing them to conform to homophobic or transphobic beliefs (even if in the name of religion), must not be contacted or coordinated with when it comes to such circumstances of mental health wellness. No matter how many times one may assert the notion of “parents’ rights,” it is well-established that there are things that cross the line into child abuse. Schools must not aid and abet abusive parents in harming their children by denying them their identities (e.g. forcing them to be treated as a boy instead of as a girl).\n\nI note a number of lines here about the rights of parents to inspect curricula and educational materials otherwise. I am thankful to see that these Model Policies do not explicitly endorse or implement the bizarrely misguided notion that anything and everything LGBT is somehow inherently “sexual” and therefore inappropriate for students. As is common sense, a homosexual relationship is no more sexual inherently than a heterosexual relationship, and a human being wearing a skirt or dress or makeup or long hair, also, does not suddenly become something sexual in character just because the person wearing it is of a different biological sex. Allowing parents to inspect or be aware of educational content is fine – and, of course, as taxpayers and citizens they should have a right to know what’s being taught in public schools. But I hope that no elements will be added to these Model Policies to openly encourage, let alone oblige, schools to bend to the whim of individual parents (or administrators, school board members, etc.) who wish to impose their personal conservative and/or religious views on everyone else, including for example, misguided views about what is and isn’t “sexual” in nature.\n\nItem 22 of this section, at the top of page 10, indicates that “Neither the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title IX, nor the Virginia Human Rights Act require school divisions to allow students of one biological sex to participate on sports teams reserved for members of the other biological sex.” I would think it advisable to insert language also just as clearly indicating that none of these laws, policies, or constitutional amendments require schools to categorize students by sex rather than by gender, or require them to have to segregate school sports (or anything else) according to sex rather than gender. Schools should be free to change with the times, and to do what is best for their students, by not denying trans athletes the freedom their cisgender classmates enjoy, to play sports and engage in other activities in a way concordant with who they are.\n\nMoving down to page 16: \nThe section on identification of students runs directly counter to the idea, expressed at the very top of the document, that “All students have the right to attend school in an environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying.”\nObliging school personnel to refer to students only by the names or nicknames in their official records, and only by the pronouns associated with their legal sex, is bullying. It is harassment. Plain and simple. I don’t understand why this gets so often completely overlooked, but these are children. People in the prime of their life, a particularly exciting and important but also vulnerable time in their life, the one and only time they will get to be children/teenagers, get to be middle-school or high-school (or elementary school) students. No one should have to suffer through years of being called “he” or “she” (rather than the other way around), or “Robert” instead of “Emily,” or whatever it may be, day in and day out, for the entirety of their teenage years, just because that’s what’s written on the records. The Model Policies indicate in several places that bullying cannot be tolerated. And yet, having teachers, school administrative staff, and others insist on calling Emily “Robert” or calling her “he,” enables and encourages bullying, rather directly. Conversely, it is when teachers and other adults support a student’s identity – for example, by referring to Emily as Emily, and as “she” and as one of the girls in the class (regardless of whether the official records say “Robert” or “M”) – that they can set a strong model that bullying will not be tolerated in their school.\nItem 6 in this section, indicating that “[School Division] shall not compel [School Division] personnel or other students to address or refer to students in any manner that would violate their constitutionally protected rights,” runs directly counter to the preceding items in the list. If a teacher wishes to exercise their First Amendment rights, their freedom of speech, to support a student, by calling them the correct name and pronouns – regardless of what’s in the record, and regardless of what a transphobic or unsupportive parent has or hasn’t put in writing – they should have that First Amendment right to do so. The school must not oblige them to do otherwise, e.g. by “only” using the correct name and pronouns only when parents have put something in writing.\n\nI hope that you will reconsider various elements of these proposed policies, and will search your hearts and do the right thing to make things better, truly supportive, truly free of harassment and bullying and discrimination, for all students – including trans students.\nThank you for your consideration.\n"}">It is wonderful to see that Virginia is adopting policies aimed at creating a school "environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying." I am very glad to see that the 2022 Model Policies include "accommodat[ing] students with distinctive needs, including any student with a persistent and sincere belief that his or her gender differs from his or her sex."
My apologies for a lengthy comment, but I will put the core ideas immediately, first. Namely:

*Obliging teachers and other school staff to call students by a name or pronouns contrary to how they identify (e.g. because that is what aligns with official records) is harassment and bullying. It does lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interests of students.

*Outing students to their parents and otherwise coordinating with parents who may be abusively unsupportive (transphobic, etc.) is harassment and bullying. It does lead and will lead to disastrously negative mental health outcomes, and it is not in the best interest of students. Students are people, and parental rights must not be seen as all-encompassing. Students, even when under the age of 18, have human rights.
*Discriminating against a student based on whether they are trans or not is discrimination. It can be easy to hide behind the idea that “segregation of sports teams, bathrooms, etc., according to sex is not discrimination,” but the issue is not whether it’s okay to have boys’ locker rooms and girls’ locker rooms. The issue is whether it is okay to tell some girls they must be treated differently than the other girls. We do not segregate the Black girls from the White girls, the red-headed girls from the blonde girls, the lesbians from the straight girls, and we should not segregate the trans girls from the cis girls. That would be discrimination, and it’s not right.
Now, to get into it:
Coordinating with parents is a wonderful thing, especially when those parents are supportive of a student's gender identity and/or transition. Virginia must not be like Texas or other states where parents doing the right thing to support their children is being treated like child abuse. I am concerned, however, about statements like "Parents have the right to make decisions with respect to their children" and "Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs" which do not seem to account at all for children's rights to their own identities and their own decisions, or for the tragically all too common case of parents who are abusively unsupportive of their child's gender identity or transition.
Coordinating with parents to support a child's identity (incl. name, pronouns, which gender-segregated activities they participate in) is important and valuable, just the same as coordinating with parents to address a child's medical issues. A school would not deny a child accommodations for an insulin pump or inhaler, or a need to visit the school nurse once a day to receive medication, or whatever it may be - a school would not go out of its way to intentionally do physical (medical) harm to a student, regardless of a parent's wishes, and so just the same, a school should not go out of its way to do harm to a student when it comes to mental health, regardless of outdated, damaging, conservative beliefs about parental rights or religious freedom. A school should not "out" students to their parents, and should not coordinate with parents to abuse their children, to push them into frighteningly serious depression, anxiety, or mental health circumstances otherwise, in the name of “parental rights.” The well-being of the child, and considerations for the rights of the child themselves as human beings, as individuals, as US citizens, must come first, ahead of privileging parents’ rights to do as they wish.

Turning to section VI,

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution: Forbids government actors from requiring individuals, including children in public schools, to adhere to or adopt particular ideological beliefs.

Yes, indeed. And it is precisely for this reason that schools must not require individuals, including children, to adhere to or adopt anyone’s conservative and/or religious beliefs regarding sexual orientation or gender. Beliefs that there are only two genders, that “gender” isn’t real and only biological sex is, beliefs that one can never change one’s gender, that trans identities aren’t real, all of these are beliefs, they are ideologies. And they should not be imposed upon students, plain and simple.

“Schools may not abrogate the rights of parents.” Just as these Model Policies indicate, ““[i]f the student has indicated that the reason for being at imminent risk of suicide relates to parental abuse or neglect, this contact shall not be made with the parent.” I would very much hope that language can be inserted into these Model Policies to clearly and explicitly indicate that this applies to gender identity as well. Parents who are contributing to a student’s depression, anxiety, trauma, etc. by denying them their gender identity, by forcing them to live according to a gender identity that is not their own, by forcing them to conform to homophobic or transphobic beliefs (even if in the name of religion), must not be contacted or coordinated with when it comes to such circumstances of mental health wellness. No matter how many times one may assert the notion of “parents’ rights,” it is well-established that there are things that cross the line into child abuse. Schools must not aid and abet abusive parents in harming their children by denying them their identities (e.g. forcing them to be treated as a boy instead of as a girl).

I note a number of lines here about the rights of parents to inspect curricula and educational materials otherwise. I am thankful to see that these Model Policies do not explicitly endorse or implement the bizarrely misguided notion that anything and everything LGBT is somehow inherently “sexual” and therefore inappropriate for students. As is common sense, a homosexual relationship is no more sexual inherently than a heterosexual relationship, and a human being wearing a skirt or dress or makeup or long hair, also, does not suddenly become something sexual in character just because the person wearing it is of a different biological sex. Allowing parents to inspect or be aware of educational content is fine – and, of course, as taxpayers and citizens they should have a right to know what’s being taught in public schools. But I hope that no elements will be added to these Model Policies to openly encourage, let alone oblige, schools to bend to the whim of individual parents (or administrators, school board members, etc.) who wish to impose their personal conservative and/or religious views on everyone else, including for example, misguided views about what is and isn’t “sexual” in nature.

Item 22 of this section, at the top of page 10, indicates that “Neither the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, Title IX, nor the Virginia Human Rights Act require school divisions to allow students of one biological sex to participate on sports teams reserved for members of the other biological sex.” I would think it advisable to insert language also just as clearly indicating that none of these laws, policies, or constitutional amendments require schools to categorize students by sex rather than by gender, or require them to have to segregate school sports (or anything else) according to sex rather than gender. Schools should be free to change with the times, and to do what is best for their students, by not denying trans athletes the freedom their cisgender classmates enjoy, to play sports and engage in other activities in a way concordant with who they are.

Moving down to page 16:
The section on identification of students runs directly counter to the idea, expressed at the very top of the document, that “All students have the right to attend school in an environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying.”
Obliging school personnel to refer to students only by the names or nicknames in their official records, and only by the pronouns associated with their legal sex, is bullying. It is harassment. Plain and simple. I don’t understand why this gets so often completely overlooked, but these are children. People in the prime of their life, a particularly exciting and important but also vulnerable time in their life, the one and only time they will get to be children/teenagers, get to be middle-school or high-school (or elementary school) students. No one should have to suffer through years of being called “he” or “she” (rather than the other way around), or “Robert” instead of “Emily,” or whatever it may be, day in and day out, for the entirety of their teenage years, just because that’s what’s written on the records. The Model Policies indicate in several places that bullying cannot be tolerated. And yet, having teachers, school administrative staff, and others insist on calling Emily “Robert” or calling her “he,” enables and encourages bullying, rather directly. Conversely, it is when teachers and other adults support a student’s identity – for example, by referring to Emily as Emily, and as “she” and as one of the girls in the class (regardless of whether the official records say “Robert” or “M”) – that they can set a strong model that bullying will not be tolerated in their school.
Item 6 in this section, indicating that “[School Division] shall not compel [School Division] personnel or other students to address or refer to students in any manner that would violate their constitutionally protected rights,” runs directly counter to the preceding items in the list. If a teacher wishes to exercise their First Amendment rights, their freedom of speech, to support a student, by calling them the correct name and pronouns – regardless of what’s in the record, and regardless of what a transphobic or unsupportive parent has or hasn’t put in writing – they should have that First Amendment right to do so. The school must not oblige them to do otherwise, e.g. by “only” using the correct name and pronouns only when parents have put something in writing.

I hope that you will reconsider various elements of these proposed policies, and will search your hearts and do the right thing to make things better, truly supportive, truly free of harassment and bullying and discrimination, for all students – including trans students.
Thank you for your consideration.


Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

This proposal will harm trans students. LGBTQ+ youth should have the right to come out when they feel safe and to be their authentic selves at school without the threat of being outed to their non-affirming family and peers.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

As an educator and member of the LGBTQ+ community, I absolutely oppose Younkin’s Student Policy. School is supposed to be a safe space for all, and this policy is very dangerous. It should not ever go into effect, as it is rooted in transphobia.


Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>My name is Shira Greer and I am a strong ally of the trams and non-binary community. Trans and non-binary students deserve autonomy, privacy, and respect when it comes to how they identify. Informing parents of their choices could create dangerous and potentially life-threatening situations. In addition,, all students deserve to be respected by teachers and peers in the classroom no matter how they identify. Give trans and non-binary students the respectful and safe school environment they deserve. </p>


Oppose the Draft Policy / Stand with Trans Students

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a mother, ally, and adamant believer in equality, I strongly oppose the draft policy. All students deserve a safe and equitable experience in our schools and I implore the VDOE to pursue policy that supports and protects trans and non-binary students.


LEADERSHIP IS NEEDED TO SUPPORT THE GOVERNOR'S LBGT POLICY

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The transgender has become a divisive issue that community, political, church, and legal leadership are needed to support Youngkin's policy on LBGT that makes sense and brings needed guidance to the unnecessary chaotic environment in the educational and school system. Youngkin's policy brings society back on track to focus on what it is important to study in our school system.  There are too many demons out there and Youngkin's leadership is needed to enact a policy that supports human dignity and paves the future pathways to success.  </p>
<p> </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please stop judging others that are different than you. They did not choose to be trans. It is the way they were born. Please be kind and let others live their lives - it’s already hard enough for them. What would you do if one of your children or grandkids were trans? Please treat all students equally!!!


Very Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

These proposed model policies are contrary to state law and will be extremely harmful to transgender and nonbinary kids. Protect trans and nonbinary kids. RESCIND these model policies. Trans rights are human rights.


Concerned compassionate citizen

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I oppose the policy proposed by Governor Youngkin. I am a heterosexual married mom and grandma. I have trans family members and friends. As with any civil rights activity there is a lot of misinformation and highly inflammatory information against the minority seeking equality. Whether or not you “ believe in” someone being transgender, they are here and they are human beings who just want to be safe and live their lives. \nIn the 50’s and 60’s people thought the black community would “ rape our women “ and needed to be separated. Today people say “ I don’t want a man in a dress to assault my daughter in a bathroom” . The incidence Of a transgender human being assaulted by a heterosexual person is much greater than the above fear. These people deserve the same safety and access and anonymity as anyone else. If any child seeks help and counseling, I believe the school should help that child if the child fears for their safety. I understand that parents want to be informed but you know what, our kids are going to keep things from us regardless. I advocate that transgender kids be allowed the same privacy as someone reporting abuse to a teacher. \nA va tech student beat to death a person for being transgender. This is what this group is facing daily. \nI again oppose Gov Youngkins proposal "}'>I oppose the policy proposed by Governor Youngkin. I am a heterosexual married mom and grandma. I have trans family members and friends. As with any civil rights activity there is a lot of misinformation and highly inflammatory information against the minority seeking equality. Whether or not you “ believe in” someone being transgender, they are here and they are human beings who just want to be safe and live their lives.
In the 50’s and 60’s people thought the black community would “ rape our women “ and needed to be separated. Today people say “ I don’t want a man in a dress to assault my daughter in a bathroom” . The incidence Of a transgender human being assaulted by a heterosexual person is much greater than the above fear. These people deserve the same safety and access and anonymity as anyone else. If any child seeks help and counseling, I believe the school should help that child if the child fears for their safety. I understand that parents want to be informed but you know what, our kids are going to keep things from us regardless. I advocate that transgender kids be allowed the same privacy as someone reporting abuse to a teacher.
A va tech student beat to death a person for being transgender. This is what this group is facing daily.
I again oppose Gov Youngkins proposal


I OPPOSE the guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE this guidance!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"This bill is trying to bully children that are born this way. They are not harming us so what is the problem. I know there are plenty that have actually taken their life due to being treated as an outcast. Now it is not just their peers bullying them but the schools. Its hard enough to come out. I suspect my son is gay and it scares me how he will be treated as well when he decides to come out. If schools mark some students effectively in the way they propose, they foster an environment where no student is included and safe."}'>This bill is trying to bully children that are born this way. They are not harming us so what is the problem. I know there are plenty that have actually taken their life due to being treated as an outcast. Now it is not just their peers bullying them but the schools. Its hard enough to come out. I suspect my son is gay and it scares me how he will be treated as well when he decides to come out. If schools mark some students effectively in the way they propose, they foster an environment where no student is included and safe.


Please oppose Governor Youngkin's draft model policy

I am a retired elementary school teacher, concerned that the proposed model policy will lead to more bullying in Virginia schools. The rate of suicide attempts by transgender youth is significantly higher than average, but having at least one accepting adult can reduce the risk of suicide attempts by 40%. Why, then, would the draft model policy prohibit teachers and other school staff from supporting trans and non-binary students? The 2021 Virginia Department of Education policy was a positive one. Why change it?Thank you!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am a retired elementary school teacher, concerned that the proposed model policy will lead to more bullying in Virginia schools.  The rate of suicide attempts by transgender youth is significantly higher than average, but having at least one accepting adult can reduce the risk of suicide attempts by 40%.  Why, then, would the draft model policy prohibit teachers and other school staff from supporting trans and non-binary students?  \n\nThe 2021 Virginia Department of Education policy was a positive one.  Why change it?\n\n Thank you!"}'>I am a retired elementary school teacher, concerned that the proposed model policy will lead to more bullying in Virginia schools. The rate of suicide attempts by transgender youth is significantly higher than average, but having at least one accepting adult can reduce the risk of suicide attempts by 40%. Why, then, would the draft model policy prohibit teachers and other school staff from supporting trans and non-binary students?

The 2021 Virginia Department of Education policy was a positive one. Why change it?

Thank you!


Opposed — there’s enough to worry about already

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The idea of forcing officials who are supposed to be trusted by students to put them to their parents is outrageous. Not only does it promote the concept that school officials cannot be trusted, but also can lead to an increase in domestic abuse and teen suicide. It is incredibly dangerous for many LGBTQ youths in America right now, and being forcefully outed  to their  parents can pose serious health risks. What happens if this passes and a student is outed to  a parent who doesn’t support transgender rights? What happens if that parent then turns and abuses that child? Or if that child is then forced through some form of conversion “therapy” that leads to their eventual suicide? What then? This bill is going to do nothing but cause more problems with mental health in Virginia. There are so many other major concerns facing students that this is not the most important thing that the legislature should be concerned about. </p>


Draft Model Policies for VA public schools

I am opposed to the draft Model Policies on the privacy, dignity, and respect for all students and parents in Virginia's public schools.In my opinion, the proposed policies will not create a supportive environment for trans and nonbinary students. It will instead damage the mental health and physical well being of these students by refusing to acknowledge, much less accommodate, their chosen gender identity. As the aunt of two transgender students, both of whom have had the good fortune to enjoy extraordinary support from their parents and family, I believe it is critical to create an environment that affirms their gender identity and provides the support necessary for them to navigate this very difficult situation. While I agree that parents have the right to educate their children in their desired beliefs and values, I also believe that in some situations, irreparable harm would befall the student whose parents were notified of their gender nonconformity. Inflexible policies that do not consider and allow for these situations would be in error.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I am opposed to the draft Model Policies on the privacy, dignity, and respect for all students and parents in Virginia's public schools.\n\nIn my opinion, the proposed policies will not create a supportive environment for trans and nonbinary students. It will instead damage the mental health and physical well being of these students by refusing to acknowledge, much less accommodate, their chosen gender identity. As the aunt of two transgender students, both of whom have had the good fortune to enjoy extraordinary support from their parents and family, I believe it is critical to create an environment that affirms their gender identity and provides the support necessary for them to navigate this very difficult situation. \n\nWhile I agree that parents have the right to educate their children in their desired beliefs and values, I also believe that in some situations, irreparable harm would befall the student whose parents were notified of their gender nonconformity. Inflexible policies that do not consider and allow for these situations would be in error.\n "}">I am opposed to the draft Model Policies on the privacy, dignity, and respect for all students and parents in Virginia's public schools.

In my opinion, the proposed policies will not create a supportive environment for trans and nonbinary students. It will instead damage the mental health and physical well being of these students by refusing to acknowledge, much less accommodate, their chosen gender identity. As the aunt of two transgender students, both of whom have had the good fortune to enjoy extraordinary support from their parents and family, I believe it is critical to create an environment that affirms their gender identity and provides the support necessary for them to navigate this very difficult situation.

While I agree that parents have the right to educate their children in their desired beliefs and values, I also believe that in some situations, irreparable harm would befall the student whose parents were notified of their gender nonconformity. Inflexible policies that do not consider and allow for these situations would be in error.


Opposition to the 2022 MPPDRASPVPS

Benjamin Steger, Associate Professor, George Mason University

<!DOCTYPE html>

These proposed changes are discriminatory and violate fundamental human rights regarding the health and self-determination of students and parents. Furthermore, these proposed changes endanger the lives, health, and well-being of transgender, non-gender conforming, gender non-binary and gender fluid students in the Commonwealth of Virginia by threatening students’ identities and humanity, effectively ostracizing them, and denying them the same opportunities and rights of cisgender students. These proposed policies are not evidence-based and disregard the multi-disciplinary consensus around educational policies and practices that ensure LGBTQIA+ students have equal access to education in a manner free from discrimination, fear, intimidation, and bullying.

Public education is a fundamental right and every child deserves a safe, inclusive environment, where diversity is respected, in which to learn. As faculty, I view it as our essential responsibility to foster each student’s success to the best of our ability. This includes efforts to ensure that every student that we welcome through our doors has not faced discriminatory and harmful public policies in the primary and secondary educational institutions of Virginia.

This includes efforts to ensure that every student that we welcome through our doors has not faced discriminatory and harmful public policies in the primary and secondary educational institutions of Virginia. As such, I strongly condemn the proposed 2022 “Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools” as harmful, discriminatory, and dangerous and enjoin the Virginia Department of Education to rescind them.


I oppose this guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I oppose this guidance. Trans children don't deserve to be singled out for political gain when all they want is to be treated like any other child. Schools should be safe places for all children to be who they are without judgement! Keep your hatred out of schools and allow these kids to just live their lives, there's absolutely no reason to allow this guidance to pass. I'm not transgender myself, but have family who are. I have nothing but love and am so happy that they're living as their authentic selves - children deserve the same."}">I oppose this guidance. Trans children don't deserve to be singled out for political gain when all they want is to be treated like any other child. Schools should be safe places for all children to be who they are without judgement! Keep your hatred out of schools and allow these kids to just live their lives, there's absolutely no reason to allow this guidance to pass. I'm not transgender myself, but have family who are. I have nothing but love and am so happy that they're living as their authentic selves - children deserve the same.


STOP ATTACKING OUR TRANSKIDS!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Gender-affirming healthcare has saved my life.
Trans rights are human rights! Every child and adult deserves to be who they are without fear. This is not a debate. Stop these horrid attacks! Now! ASAP!! Gender-affirming care is healthcare. Seriously. This hate has to STOP!!


I strongly support the State of Virginia's 2022 Model Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

From the beginning of time, God's laws, including parenting, come first.  Man's laws, including State and Federal, come last.


Opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is bogus babel by so called christians. God made us all but the Republicans can't conduct themselves with love and compassion toward fellow humans but instead go into a climax of hatred against anything they deem unworthy.

There are riots in Iran because perverted old men command women wear a covering on their head. This is a similar situation.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Support trans rights! This bill will do nothing but further the amount of discrimination that trans youth already face. This policing of what students are and are not \"allowed\" to identify as is counterproductive to education, and blatant discrimination against transgender youth. It's not your job to tell kids whether or not they're \"allowed\" to be trans. Focus on the issues that ACTUALLY matter, not if trans kids are allowed to be treated with basic decency or not."}">Support trans rights! This bill will do nothing but further the amount of discrimination that trans youth already face. This policing of what students are and are not "allowed" to identify as is counterproductive to education, and blatant discrimination against transgender youth. It's not your job to tell kids whether or not they're "allowed" to be trans. Focus on the issues that ACTUALLY matter, not if trans kids are allowed to be treated with basic decency or not.


Protect Trans Youth!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>As a high school teacher, I work with many trans youth and know how much they already struggle. It is essential that we protect trans youth and not apply these policies which would harm them in many ways and which contradict the policies already in place in some schools. </p>


Give them access and let them live!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Please leave transgender kids alone. Other students have no problem accepting them.  When the adults begin to stereotype and ostracize this group in our society, only then do their peers in the classroom become biased. \n The transgender community has always been a part of society, and they always will be. We need to acknowledge them and provide accessibility for them in the schools. Stigmatizing these students and not allowing them their basic needs and rights, which include their gender identity through their pronouns and restrooms and in sports, only harms them. \n If you only knew the courage and strength it takes for them to face each and every day in this world, you would back off and simply let them be. \n One day, it will be your own child or grandchild. You will then see the turmoil of their own gender discomfort, as well as the amazing strength they possess to live as their authentic self. If the are not allowed to live in the gender they perceive, they cannot reach their full potential, and sadly, most cannot face life at all when forced to live against their nature. \n If you as a leader take the steps in VA to restrict transgender students from their authenticity, their rights as a human being, you are only going backwards in your governing. \n Please, consider this generation. Look at the children and how they have no issue with the non-binary students. They know instinctively that some classmates are more fluid in their gender than others. We all know this! It has and always will be this way. So why fight it? Why the segregation? \n Just as you have, in time, added ramps and wide doors for students in wheelchairs, you one day will add preferred pronouns and gender neutral bathrooms. Go ahead and do this now for the sake of the children. "}'>Please leave transgender kids alone. Other students have no problem accepting them. When the adults begin to stereotype and ostracize this group in our society, only then do their peers in the classroom become biased.
The transgender community has always been a part of society, and they always will be. We need to acknowledge them and provide accessibility for them in the schools. Stigmatizing these students and not allowing them their basic needs and rights, which include their gender identity through their pronouns and restrooms and in sports, only harms them.
If you only knew the courage and strength it takes for them to face each and every day in this world, you would back off and simply let them be.
One day, it will be your own child or grandchild. You will then see the turmoil of their own gender discomfort, as well as the amazing strength they possess to live as their authentic self. If the are not allowed to live in the gender they perceive, they cannot reach their full potential, and sadly, most cannot face life at all when forced to live against their nature.
If you as a leader take the steps in VA to restrict transgender students from their authenticity, their rights as a human being, you are only going backwards in your governing.
Please, consider this generation. Look at the children and how they have no issue with the non-binary students. They know instinctively that some classmates are more fluid in their gender than others. We all know this! It has and always will be this way. So why fight it? Why the segregation?
Just as you have, in time, added ramps and wide doors for students in wheelchairs, you one day will add preferred pronouns and gender neutral bathrooms. Go ahead and do this now for the sake of the children.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I strongly oppose. Let kids be who they want to be. Why do you care so much about limiting transgender rights? This is very harmful. </p>


Trans rights are human rights- protect trans kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

To begin with, I am strongly opposed to any proposed legislation that diminishes the freedom of trans or gender non-conforming students to excercise authority and agency over their own bodies and gender expression.

To limit the ability of a person to express their true self is an act of violence, coercion, and bullying.


Support policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Parents have a right to know what’s going on in their child’s life. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Youngkin's latest attempt at seriously limiting trans students’ rights in Virginia public schools and seeking to roll back previously-passed protections is wrong!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"This proposal is an act of hate disguised as \"protection.\" The science is clear: supportive, inclusive environments save lives. 85% of transgender and nonbinary youth, and two-thirds of all LGBTQ youth, say that recent debates around anti-trans bills have negatively impacted their mental health. Continuing this debate will lead to greater rates of depression, suicide, bullying, etc. I oppose this guidance and strongly urge you to do so as well."}'>This proposal is an act of hate disguised as "protection." The science is clear: supportive, inclusive environments save lives. 85% of transgender and nonbinary youth, and two-thirds of all LGBTQ youth, say that recent debates around anti-trans bills have negatively impacted their mental health. Continuing this debate will lead to greater rates of depression, suicide, bullying, etc. I oppose this guidance and strongly urge you to do so as well.


I support Glenn Youngkin’s transgender bill.  Parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

I believe parents have the right to say what their children can be taught and what they do, not teachers, counselors or the government.


STOP THIS HARMFUL LEGISLATION

<!DOCTYPE html>

The legislative changes being proposed do absolutely nothing to protect students and teachers outside the LGBTQIA+ community. They actively harm the beautiful and VULNERABLE minority of students who are transgender. They reflect institutionalized homophobia and transphobia under the guise of moral superiority and further marginalize a community that needs more, not less, understanding and support.


Don't take Virginia backward

<!DOCTYPE html>

The future should be protective and inclusive of all students. It should not foster harmful discrimination and hurt to assuage the narrow-minded. Reject the proposed rules now.


Support Trans Kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I am saddened by these new measures which will endanger Trans children and strip them of their identities. These policies are harmful and will force Trans students to face higher rates of depression and suicide. The attack on Trans communities belongs no where near the classroom and does nothing to foster an environment of learning. </p>


Support Trans Kids!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Our family has a non-binary teen among our five children and we LOVE AND SUPPORT them unconditionally. Please allow educators and schools to support this vulnerable population. Everyone deserves to be happy and true to themselves and as a society, we have a duty to protect our children!
These policies are ANTI-child and ANTI-family!
I am a social worker and former public school teacher and it is contrary to everything we learn and train for to isolate and stigmatize trans kids. It is unhealthy and bigoted.
Please Virginia, let’s lead with LOVE and ACCEPTANCE!


Support your constituents no matter their gender!

<!DOCTYPE html>

You seem afraid of trans gender people, so you try to suppress them. It's so backward-thinking. It's healthier to be open and honest about our sexuality. I have a trans friend and he is one of the coolest people I know. He is courageous, smart and kind. Get with it. Don't be afraid of "them". They won't hurt you. Thank you.


CONCUR

<!DOCTYPE html>

Governor Youngkin is spot on!  We need to take back our schools.


I oppose the draft model policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the draft model policy. Trans rights are human rights and failing to support our trans neighbors, friends, and family is embarrassing.


I Oppose the Guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

This draft guidance is rooted in hate and would foster a dangerous environment in our schools. Trans and non-binary students are healthier and happier when their identities are affirmed.


Trans and non binary students belong

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Transgender and non-binary individuals deserve the same basic, human rights that everyone else receives. The idea that trans or NB students shouldn't be able to learn in peace clearly illustrates an overstep by the government into the lives of its citizens. Having a trans or NB child is a PRIVATE matter for families to work through without the interference of politicians or religious zealots. Diversity is inevitable, and compassion for those who are different is a valuable attribute that will serve students and their communities well as they enter into adult society."}">Transgender and non-binary individuals deserve the same basic, human rights that everyone else receives. The idea that trans or NB students shouldn't be able to learn in peace clearly illustrates an overstep by the government into the lives of its citizens. Having a trans or NB child is a PRIVATE matter for families to work through without the interference of politicians or religious zealots. Diversity is inevitable, and compassion for those who are different is a valuable attribute that will serve students and their communities well as they enter into adult society.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Every American deserves a world class education no matter their orientation. PERIOD.


I oppose


Don't Confuse Out children

<!DOCTYPE html>

Proposed "guidelines" do nothing to help children, whatever their gender so don't do it. It also puts pressure on teachers to make life difficult for transgendered children so don't do it.


Strongly oppose this violent legislation

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose this violent legislation - which is violent towards trans children, their families, and by extension to all of us by denying the humanity and dignity of trans people. It’s cruel, completely unnecessary, hateful and an utter waste of government resources. Trans kids, deserve love and protection, NOT to have their very selves questioned and persecuted. Stop this in its tracks!

Chloe Hawkins, Charlottesville VA resident


Guidance Opposition

<!DOCTYPE html>

Some of the most wholesome people I’ve met, and also one of my close friends, are trans. I treated them with equality and respect because they treated me the same way. This treatment is what they deserve as human beings. I would hope that the school system could uphold the same basic principles. Therefore, I OPPOSE the guidance.


STRONGLY OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose this proposed policy.  The policy put forward would would create a hostile and potentially dangerous school environment for transgender and nonbinary youth. These kids need acceptance and support, not authority figures "outing" them, being prohibited from affirming their names and preferred pronouns. Every human being deserves a chance to be accepted for who they are, and the idea of participating in activities along with their peers is core to happiness and academic and social development for high schoolers.   All Virginia students deserve a supportive and affirming school environment, especially vulnerable and marginalized populations like transgender and nonbinary youth. Marginalized youth are more vulnerable to self-harmful behaviors, including suicide, when they feel that their peers and their community are osctracizing them. Please look with compassion on all the young people of Virginia and reject this draconian bill.


TRANS LIVES MATTER!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"It is important to make distinctions between instances where “kids are being kids” and when they’re asserting things about themselves that are critical to their identity and development -- as is the case with gender identity and expression. \nGender identity and expression are central to the way we see ourselves and engage in the world around us. This is certainly true of transgender and gender-expansive children and teens, for whom family and community  support is absolutely CRITICAL. \nThis support can be the difference between life and death. Parents and caregivers can find resources, peer support, and professional guidance to help along the journey, and to insure that your child can not just survive, but thrive. Stop trying to pass laws attacking our children!!!! VOTE BLUE?????? save lives!   "}'>It is important to make distinctions between instances where “kids are being kids” and when they’re asserting things about themselves that are critical to their identity and development -- as is the case with gender identity and expression.
Gender identity and expression are central to the way we see ourselves and engage in the world around us. This is certainly true of transgender and gender-expansive children and teens, for whom family and community support is absolutely CRITICAL.
This support can be the difference between life and death. Parents and caregivers can find resources, peer support, and professional guidance to help along the journey, and to insure that your child can not just survive, but thrive. Stop trying to pass laws attacking our children!!!! VOTE BLUE?????? save lives!


Don’t discriminate - support all students

Governor, other officials and staffs,It is difficult to comprehend why you seemingly believe that you can only maintain support of your voters if you embrace discrimination. You are a grave disappointment. Thank you for your attention.Laura Altschul

<!DOCTYPE html>

Governor, other officials and staffs,

It is difficult to comprehend why you seemingly believe that you can only maintain support of your voters if you embrace discrimination. You are a grave disappointment.

Thank you for your attention.

Laura Altschul


Trans Kids Just Want to Attend Safe/Supportive Schools--So Develop a Model Policy to Support That

<!DOCTYPE html>

I'm not an educator; however, I've been blessed to work with/for professional educators for most of my career. From school administrators to classroom teachers to counselors, everyone that I know personally wants the same thing: To create a safe, supportive learning environment so that all children are able to perform to their highest abilities.

I struggle to understand how these "model policies" do that. And, of all the issues affecting the ability of our state's public schools to deliver a high-quality education to each of its students, this is one of your very first education initiatives?

The only thing that every trans kid I know wants is to be treated with respect and dignity--and to be able to learn in a safe, supportive environment.

Not all children have safe, supportive home situations. For many children school IS their safe space. Please spend more time speaking with public school administrators, teachers, and counselors. I personally have learned so much from my time with them--especially how to be a more caring and empathetic adult.

Please also use your time in office to find ways to support and resource our state's public schools and people who choose to work in public education. Not everyone can afford to send their children to private schools. We need strong, public schools as a cornerstone of our democracy, and we definitely need public schools to help prepare people to be educated, productive members of society, culture, and workforce. That's something all of us public school parents and/or taxpayers can get behind and support.

Please don't place some our state's most vulnerable children in the center of a culture war that they never signed up to fight.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I attended Virginia public schools from kindergarten to graduation. During my time in school, I had a few friends who were transgender or non-binary. Them being correctly gendered by their teachers and peers was critical for their mental health and self-esteem.

I understand and respect that parents want to know what is happening with their children in school, but their children are people too. People who need somewhere to figure out how they relate to their own gender, and test out new pronouns and identities. Some kids aren't ready to tell their parents, or want to tell their parents on their own terms once they have it more figured out. Not to mention that not all kids have safe parents. Outing children to their parents can lead to abuse, or children being kicked out of their own homes. Most kids have a decent idea to how their parents will react and may not be telling their parents for very good reason.

Every person should have to right to their own identity, and to express it any way they want, so long as it isn't hurting anyone else. Trans and non-binary kids are not an exception to this, and by forcibly outing kids to their parents, you are putting kids in danger. This is not a policy backed by science, experts, or medicine. It is made out of fear and a desire to control the identities of children. Experts, doctors, and researchers largely disagree with this policy decision, and I stand behind them. This is not right.

My trans and non-binary friend were able to feel supported at school, even if they didn't at home. That shouldn't be taken away from this generation. If home isn't a safe place for them, at least let school be, especially by school staff that actively WANTS to support these students. This is a ridiculous policy that goes against what is best for children. School should be about supporting the children in its system, not pandering to parents.


Stop trying to legislate away trans kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

You cant force people out of being trans just because you dont like it, you just make them miserable under the guise of keeping schools safe from people who just want to exist without being bullied by politicians like you.