I strongly oppose this measure

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose this measure.


Common Sense

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin's initiative to affirm the rights of parents to be informed and involved in their child's public school education. It is common sense that the public school education system should protect children from manipulation and being indoctrinated with immoral values and beliefs. It is common sense that the public school education should not be engaged in deceiving parents about indecent and immoral curriculum and assignments being pushed on students by educators. It is time to restore decency to the public school education system and ensure that our children are protected from groomers and predators.


Strongly opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is further hurting an already vulnerable group. ALL of our kids have the right to self-determination. Let people be who they want to be, who they feel they are. Have compassion.

Why this? Why make all this effort to further disenfranchise kids?

It is painful to see how much fear and hatred is out there. Our kids need us. They need our support. SUPPORT ALL KIDS!


As a Libertarian I STRONGLY oppose this government OVERREACH

<!DOCTYPE html>

It has been shown that allowing students to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity is just one of a host of school policies that have been shown to improve the educational experiences of transgender, gender nonconforming, and cisgender students. In schools with policies that explicitly prohibit anti-LGBTQ bullying, students have better relationships with staff and as a result feel safer in the school. When transgender students are respected, they are able to engage fully and equitably with the educational experience, and when that happens, transgender students, like all students, are able to thrive


Opposition to proposed transgender school policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>”Separate but equal” has been settled by the US Supreme Court. Nondiscriminatory public accommodation in restaurants, hotels and public education has been settled by the Virginia Human Rights Act of 2020. Title IX specifically includes sexual orientation and gender identity is protected categories for School services. These proposals are not about parental rights. They are a dog whistle to religious conservatives who feel they have the right to impose their beliefs and phobias on others. They proclaim open season for bullying with administrative sanction which led to eight suicides in the Anoka Hennepin school system. They specifically target the most vulnerable students at their most vulnerable ages with unequal treatment and relieve teachers of their most precious and professional commission to help each child reach their full potential.</p>


Oppose in the Strongest Possible Terms

<!DOCTYPE html>

Data shows 82% of trans youth have considered killing themselves and 40% have attempted to do so due to specific stressors of their experience, including but not limited to significant stigmas and a fear of acceptance and belonging, etc. Instituting policies that refuse to acknowledge a student's identity or allow them to feel safe at school further puts their lives and mental health at risk. These proposed policies are reasoned by misguided beliefs only, unsupported by any sound scientific reasoning, do nothing to protect Virginian youths, and do a lot to put children even further at-risk of harm. They should never have been proposed and should certainly not be enacted. I strongly oppose these policies in every possible way.


95% in support of 2022 Model Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

The only area of the 2022 Model Policies I do not support:

I do not support the tenant that before a counselor discusses gender identity with a student, a parent must be notified & consent to do so must be provided.  This is a huge breach of confidentiality.   Students need to feel safe in reaching out to a school counselor.   Assuming school counselors are responding in an appropriate manner as a school counselor and not as an activist or an educator attempting to usurp the role of parents, I feel that confidentiality between a student & school counselor should continue to be protected.  This confidentiality remains in effect unless there is concern for the safety & well-being of another.   If a counselor has concerns that means an exception to confidentiality is warranted, there already is a procedure in place that covers this scenario & would require the counselor to contact a parent, social services, and/or police, etc.

I support all other aspects of the 2022 Model Policy:

Any policy that encourages information be kept from parents by educators is not in the best interest of students nor educators.  Any policy that pits students against parents is not in the best interest of students nor parents.  If a student chooses to have a confidential conversation with a school counselor about gender identity, this is a private & therefore confidential conversation.   If a student requests classmates and teachers use a particular name or pronoun, then the student has made the decision to make his/her preferences public and this is no longer a private/confidential matter.   If a student desires to be called a name other than an obvious derivative of the legal name, parents must provide consent in writing.

Expecting educators to use preferred pronouns is problematic in 3 ways:  1.  Unrealistic for educators to keep up with it all   2.  Infringes upon the religious beliefs of some    3.  Causes discomfort for some when having to “unlearn” grammatical correctness.

The rights of the many should not be at the expense of one.  If a student is uncomfortable using the bathroom of the biological sex, then educators can work with the student for a more comfortable alternative that does not sacrifice the privacy & security of others. (Example:  using an alternative bathroom).


Strongly agree! Parents make the decisions

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Thank you for supporting parents in making their own decisions for their own children. </p>


Oppose Gov Youngkins Transgender and Anti-CRT Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

The consequences of not affirming a child’s gender identity can be severe, and it can interfere with their ability to develop and maintain healthy interpersonal relationships. In the school context, that distress will also hinder a transgender student’s focus in class and ability to learn. The longer a transgender youth is not affirmed, the more significant and long-lasting the negative consequences can become, including loss of interest in school, heightened risk for alcohol and drug use, poor mental health and suicide. -Gender Spectrum et al., 2015, Schools in Transition—A Guide for Supporting Transgender Students in K-12 Schools 8 (2015)


I support LGBT youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stopping bullying for any student is an important goal for Virginia’s K-12 public schools. My concern is that gender identity and sexual orientation are no longer explicitly protected classes under the 2022 Model Policies and that school personnel are no longer required to obtain LGBTQ+ specific health and mental wellness professional development. In fact, it feels like VDOE is bullying the very trans kids they are claiming to protect by removing resources and policies aimed at supporting and protecting them.

LGBT are not hurting anyone; they are a vulnerable population who need the help and support of adults and their community, not vilification and revoking of critical resources.

Many people I love are part of the queer community and all they want is to be able to live their lives in peace and safety; it's not about putting an agenda or anything on anyone else. I have to live my life in fear for my trans brother because of bigots who think that he is the enemy, when all he wants is to live safely and happily.

Virginia seems to be going backwards in time with these policies and put at risk a vulnerable population, leaving them at risk to bullying, suicide, violence, and other mental and physical health risks all due to ignorance and bigotry.

For these reasons, I ask you to repeal the 2022 Model Policies and reinstate the 2021 Model Policies.


I STRONGLY OPPOSE This Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Students will not be the only ones harmed by the proposed guidance. Too often educators are required to enforce needlessly discriminatory policies by those who lack direct contact or relationships with the students and parents harmed by such policies. Policies that segregate transgender students their peers are not self-executing: they compel individual administrators, educators, and other public school employees to carry them out. Educators suffer both professional and psychological harms when they are forced to watch, and participate in, the stigmatization and degradation that discriminatory policies inflict on children.


This policy is transphobic and will cause harm for many children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This is in reference to the anti-trans and anti non-binary proposal Youngkin made recently. It’s super harmful to children and will only perpetuate hate and violence in schools. Hate and violence needs to be addressed, but you must look in a different direction; we are seeing these effects in schools nationwide in the amount of bullying and shootings. This policy will do nothing but harm trans youth increasing the rates of suicide and homophobic hate. How is this the most pressing issue to you? Do you not have bigger fish to fry than someone wanting to be called a different name and use different pronouns? </p>


I support Governor Youngkin and the restoration of parental, religious, and constitutional rights.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Children belong to their parents who raise them, not the schools or the state.

Thank you for updating these policies to restore protections for basic parental rights and ensuring that parents are no longer cut out of the process—especially when it concerns how gender and sexuality issues are handled with our kids at school.

I support the new policies’ removal of  language that encouraged school officials to follow procedures to essentially deceive parents when their children are making potentially life-altering decisions regarding their gender identity in a school setting.

The original policy had language that created a wedge between parents and their children which should never be the intent of officials. Encouraging stronger bonds between parents and children is and always should be the goal. I support the new update that removes this barrier that has been created.

I support the updated language acknowledging that students, teachers, and parents cannot be forced into compelled speech that violates their constitutional rights, including First Amendment and religious freedom protections. We are strong in our faith and while respecting others, my children and I will not go against our faith in order to make someone else comfortable. My children have rights also.

I support the schools working with parents to make decisions on how to best protect kids—especially when it comes to protecting vulnerable students in a state of undress in locker rooms or overnight sleeping quarters for school field trips.

Please finalize these updated 2022 model policies without removing any of the key protections to restore parental involvement in the process and protect children’s privacy, safety, parental rights, and most importantly rights of religious freedom.


Trans Kids Deserve Better

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>These children need to be allowed to choose who they disclose their PERSONAL information to. It’s a valuable part of bodily autonomy, sovereignty and a basic right in that only they truly know who in their life would be safe to disclose this kind of information to. Trans and nonbinary youths are subjected to twice as high rates of self-harm and suicide and that isn’t because they aren’t disclosing this information to their family, it’s because they are subjected to personal and political attacks on the validity of their own self determination. This seems like a no-brainer in a state that has already acknowledged the harms of conversion therapy. Parents are not immune to societally established hatred and bigotry and adults should not be allowed to prey upon children under the disguise of ensuring their well-being. </p>


Guidance 2022

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support guidance 2022 policies for parents to have the right and responsibility that God has given us,as parents,and that schools want to take away through these policies to educate and guide our children that con response to parents,and if their children are confused about their gender for parents to seek appropriate help for them and for schools to notify parents about their children’s gender preferences,and for schools to not take action regarding gender guidance with students.Family is the base of society that consists of Dad,Mom and their children, which doesn’t include outside people.I also support that students  must use their birth gender appropriate bathroom( male or female),the same goes for the accommodations and locker rooms students must use birth gender appropriate accommodations and locker rooms.I support the freedom to chose your own religion for personnel and students.


Transgender policies in public schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

I’m vehemently opposed to this proposed legislation; it is the equivalent of public shaming for children who are already struggling with their identities.


Please reconsider pushing this bill

<!DOCTYPE html>

When transgender students are denied access to facilities that align with their gender identity, they often avoid participating in sports, gym and refrain from using the bathroom altogether. Bathroom avoidance is a common problem for transgender students and is linked to medical problems and diminished educational outcomes. For instance, in a 2013 study conducted by the Williams Institute, 54 percent of transgender respondents reported some sort of health problem related to bathroom avoidance, including dehydration, urinary tract infections, kidney infections and other kidney problems.


Make bathrooms safe again

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stop the madness. Restore common sense in schools. Allow children to experience the innocence of youth.


Make bathrooms safe again # metoo


Transgender policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>If you let a boy go into the bathroom with any of my girls in their schools, or in licker rooms, or ask them to call them by any gender other than their God given one, I will file a lawsuit as just the first step. </p>


Strongly Oppose Glen Younkin's transgender policy for VA schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>State government has no business getting involved in these matters. This policy is discriminatory and undermines kids' abilities to fully participate and thrive in school. There is no true purpose to this policy except to push bigoted ideas and regulations onto Virginia's students. </p>


I oppose this bill

<!DOCTYPE html>

School policies that respect transgender students not only benefit transgender students, but also promote a positive school climate for all students. School climate—that is, the “product of the interpersonal relationships among students, families, teachers, support staff and administrators” that sets the “norms, values, and expectations that support people feeling socially, emotionally, and physically safe” in school—is a key predictor of student engagement, student mental and physical health, and academic achievement, and is positively correlated with decreased absenteeism, dropout rates, and suspensions


Strong support parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Governor,

Thank you for supporting parents rights and protecting our children.  May the Lord continue guiding you.


Protect transgender children

I am a proud lesbian woman, and my relationship with this issue goes beyond my personal (very close) relationships with transgender individuals whom I love. As a Virginian and a compassionate human, I care deeply about the safety of ALL Virginia residents, especially the youth.
I firmly oppose this policy for several reasons;1. A 2022 NIH study reported that “82% of transgender individuals have considered killingthemselves and 40% have attempted suicide, with suicidality highest among transgenderyouth.”  The same study found that school belonging, family support, and peer support were significant protective factors against suicide attempts/suicidality.
School is supposed to be a place to learn inside and outside of the classroom, and part of that is discovering one’s sense of self—whether that be political alignment, athletic talent, true friendship, heartbreak, religious beliefs, or gender identity. The fact is that trans students would not be given an equal educational experience because of the distress caused by the new proposed policy; and, based on research like the study I cited above, the new proposed policy would likely drive more trans students toward self-harm, drug/alcohol abuse, and suicide. Here are a few key reasons why:

Forced disclosure to families can be extremely upsetting and dangerous when transyouth come from unsupportive homes. Under this new policy, rather than focusing ontheir education, trans students from unsupportive homes would either: 1) be forced tostay in the closet (causing immense psychological, social, and emotional distress) or 2) have to risk destabilizing their home environment or even being kicked out, amongother things, after disclosing their trans identity.
If a family is unsupportive, trans students will be subjected to disrespectful,dehumanizing treatment on a daily basis because the proposed policy requires familialpermission for a student to use their chosen name and pronouns. All people, includingtrans people, deserve to be spoken to with respect and dignity. A trans person usingnew pronouns is no different than using “Dr.” to convey respect, “Mom” to conveyaffection, and pronouncing a challenging name properly to show you care.
While initially great on its face, the proposed dress code could lead to discrimination.The policy does not enshrine a student’s right to dress in a way that aligns with theirgender identity and includes language that would allow teachers and administrators todiscriminate against trans and gender non-conforming students if they deem goingagainst gender norms a “distraction.” If you are a cis man, please imagine how youwould feel if someone told you one day that you had to wear a dress to work. If you area cis woman, please imagine how you would feel if someone told you that you had towear a men’s suit and tie to work. If you feel uncomfortable, just think about how itwould feel to be forced to actually do that every single day.
The bathroom and locker room policy violates federal law (See, e.g., Grimm v.Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020)) would endanger the safety oftrans students. A Harvard article cited a 2019 study showing that “36% of transgenderor gender-nonbinary students with restricted bathroom or locker room access reported being sexually assaulted in the last 12 months.” In 2016, 60% of trans people reported avoided using public restrooms for fear of confrontation, saying they had been harassed or assaulted. As a trans person, I can confirm that all I ever want is exactly what everyone else wants—to go in, use the restroom, and leave as quickly as possible. This proposed policy is nothing more than fearmongering; a 2018 empirical study by UCLA school of law found that the passage of non-discrimination laws was “not related to the number or frequency of criminal incidents” in public restrooms, locker rooms, etc. and that “reports of privacy and safety violations in public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms are exceedingly rare.” Furthermore, many trans students may be unrecognizably transgender (i.e. nobody would assume they were transgender just by looking at them), and the proposed policy would put those individuals in a situation where they are forced to out themselves in order to comply.

These are just some of the numerous problems with the new proposed policy. Please, please understand that supporting transgender students is not about taking away parental rights—it’s about recognizing that students of all identities make choices for themselves as part of learning and growing into happy, well-functioning members of society. The new proposed policy would impose significant distress because it is based on misinformation and fear rather than fact and concern for the wellbeing of all students. I strongly oppose this policy.
My passion for this issue has nothing to do with the "woke agenda" I've seen posted so many times in these comments. On the contrary - I find it to be quite simple and not radical at all to want to ensure that schools do everything they can to help reduce suicide and depression and to foster an environment of tolerance, kindness, and love. It shouldn't be a politicized opinion to want to keep the children in our lives safe. But this proposed policy would only fuel the violence (both self-inflicted and inflicted by others) to a vulnerable population that needs our love and support more than anything.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a proud lesbian woman, and my relationship with this issue goes beyond my personal (very close) relationships with transgender individuals whom I love. As a Virginian and a compassionate human, I care deeply about the safety of ALL Virginia residents, especially the youth.

I firmly oppose this policy for several reasons;

1. A 2022 NIH study reported that “82% of transgender individuals have considered killing
themselves and 40% have attempted suicide, with suicidality highest among transgender
youth.”  The same study found that school belonging, family support, and peer support were significant protective factors against suicide attempts/suicidality.

School is supposed to be a place to learn inside and outside of the classroom, and part of that is discovering one’s sense of self—whether that be political alignment, athletic talent, true friendship, heartbreak, religious beliefs, or gender identity. The fact is that trans students would not be given an equal educational experience because of the distress caused by the new proposed policy; and, based on research like the study I cited above, the new proposed policy would likely drive more trans students toward self-harm, drug/alcohol abuse, and suicide. Here are a few key reasons why:

Forced disclosure to families can be extremely upsetting and dangerous when trans
youth come from unsupportive homes. Under this new policy, rather than focusing on
their education, trans students from unsupportive homes would either: 1) be forced to
stay in the closet (causing immense psychological, social, and emotional distress) or 2) have to risk destabilizing their home environment or even being kicked out, among
other things, after disclosing their trans identity.

If a family is unsupportive, trans students will be subjected to disrespectful,
dehumanizing treatment on a daily basis because the proposed policy requires familial
permission for a student to use their chosen name and pronouns. All people, including
trans people, deserve to be spoken to with respect and dignity. A trans person using
new pronouns is no different than using “Dr.” to convey respect, “Mom” to convey
affection, and pronouncing a challenging name properly to show you care.

While initially great on its face, the proposed dress code could lead to discrimination.
The policy does not enshrine a student’s right to dress in a way that aligns with their
gender identity and includes language that would allow teachers and administrators to
discriminate against trans and gender non-conforming students if they deem going
against gender norms a “distraction.” If you are a cis man, please imagine how you
would feel if someone told you one day that you had to wear a dress to work. If you are
a cis woman, please imagine how you would feel if someone told you that you had to
wear a men’s suit and tie to work. If you feel uncomfortable, just think about how it
would feel to be forced to actually do that every single day.

The bathroom and locker room policy violates federal law (See, e.g., Grimm v.
Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586 (4th Cir. 2020)) would endanger the safety of
trans students. A Harvard article cited a 2019 study showing that “36% of transgender
or gender-nonbinary students with restricted bathroom or locker room access reported being sexually assaulted in the last 12 months.” In 2016, 60% of trans people reported avoided using public restrooms for fear of confrontation, saying they had been harassed or assaulted. As a trans person, I can confirm that all I ever want is exactly what everyone else wants—to go in, use the restroom, and leave as quickly as possible. This proposed policy is nothing more than fearmongering; a 2018 empirical study by UCLA school of law found that the passage of non-discrimination laws was “not related to the number or frequency of criminal incidents” in public restrooms, locker rooms, etc. and that “reports of privacy and safety violations in public restrooms, locker rooms, and changing rooms are exceedingly rare.” Furthermore, many trans students may be unrecognizably transgender (i.e. nobody would assume they were transgender just by looking at them), and the proposed policy would put those individuals in a situation where they are forced to out themselves in order to comply.

These are just some of the numerous problems with the new proposed policy. Please, please understand that supporting transgender students is not about taking away parental rights—it’s about recognizing that students of all identities make choices for themselves as part of learning and growing into happy, well-functioning members of society. The new proposed policy would impose significant distress because it is based on misinformation and fear rather than fact and concern for the wellbeing of all students. I strongly oppose this policy.

My passion for this issue has nothing to do with the "woke agenda" I've seen posted so many times in these comments. On the contrary - I find it to be quite simple and not radical at all to want to ensure that schools do everything they can to help reduce suicide and depression and to foster an environment of tolerance, kindness, and love. It shouldn't be a politicized opinion to want to keep the children in our lives safe. But this proposed policy would only fuel the violence (both self-inflicted and inflicted by others) to a vulnerable population that needs our love and support more than anything.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose Youngkin's policy, which puts our trans children at risk.


You’re going to get kids killed doing this

<!DOCTYPE html>

It has been shown that allowing students to use restrooms and locker rooms consistent with their gender identity is just one of a host of school policies that have been shown to improve the educational experiences of transgender, gender nonconforming, and cisgender students. In schools with policies that explicitly prohibit anti-LGBTQ bullying, students have better relationships with staff and as a result feel safer in the school. When transgender students are respected, they are able to engage fully and equitably with the educational experience, and when that happens, transgender students, like all students, are able to thrive


Oppose the Model Policies-Protect Trans Students!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am writing as a concerned citizen about the recently proposed Model Policies would which severely roll back transgender rights in Virginia. It would deny transgender youth the ability to use the facilities they identify with, create an arduous process to be acknowledged with proper pronouns, force teachers to expose one's gender identity to their parents (which can be very unsafe for many youth), and no longer require school employees to not discriminate against trans youth. Transgender youth have already extremely high rates of suicide, self-harm, and mental health crises, and this will only make that worse. Please revoke support for the Model Policies and refuse to implement these policies.


I reject any form of harassment, or discrimination against trans and nonbinary youth.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Last month, Governor Youngkin and the Virginia Department of Education proposed a deeply disturbing policy that endangers LGBTQI+ students.

Governor Youngkin's draft model policy is draconian, controlling, and rooted in transphobia. Trans and nonbinary students under this policy will be in danger of suffering:

Misgendering on a daily basis

Bullying and a learning environment with no accountability systems in place to address harassment

The inability to access sex-separated spaces matching their gender identity, which includes being prevented from using bathrooms or participating on sports teams matching their gender identity

Being outed to their parents by teachers without the student’s consent

LGBTQI+ students are already at a higher risk of suicide because of the isolation and stigmatization they face as a result of policies like the Virginia Department of Education’s that deny their identities and leave them unprotected. Virginia’s policy would only further ostracize already-marginalized students and leave them vulnerable to violence and ridicule in a world where their existence is not just denied, but increasingly labeled as dangerous-and even criminal-by extremists. Our students need us to support them, not discriminate against them.

I OPPOSE this guidance.


STRONGLY OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

This bill, if passed, WILL KILL CHILDREN. These children are NOT pawns on a political chessboard and their lives are not to be viewed and treated as such. Schools will be a safe space for all children when their identities are valued, seen, and loved.


This is a Reasonable Transgender Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin's Transgender policy.  It is well thought out, is reasonable, and it protects our children by empowering their parents.


In favor of new pro-parent policies in public schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thanks for protecting our kids and their rights.


Protect trans youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I stand with trans students and families. It is abhorrent to impose bigoted policies on children for political gain. Let chikdren live their lives and grow into the humans they are meant to be without fear for their safety and well-being. </p>


Governor Youngkin for President! Thank you for protecting our kids from ultra woke left.

<!DOCTYPE html>

The voters have spoken. Parents want the power back from the woke mob school boards. Please protect our children and give parents back their rights.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans young people are vulnerable and need our care and support. Please follow the research that shows that these young people need policies like the ones currently in place. Not all families are safe for trans young people.


Most strongly oppose this harmful policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

The policy against transgender children is state sponsored bullying that will cause harm.  Recommend that the state instead focus instead on supporting all students and creating an inclusive environment where all can excel despite their differences.


I agree with the new policy.

<!DOCTYPE html>

It is the parents decision not the school.    The schools should focus on education


I strongly oppose this hurtful and insensitive policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>School should be a safe and accepting place for all kids. This policy harms some of our most vulnerable population - for some of them school is the only place they can safely be themselves.  This policy seeks to pretend they don’t exist and  fosters an environment where they could be forcibly outed to their parents, as well as be bullied and misgendered by peers and teachers. Could someone please remind Gov Youngkin that these are kids who are at risk of depression and suicide? Virginia has come a long way , please don’t turn back the clock. </p>
<p> </p>


EQLOCO Files Formal Objection to Governor Youngkin's VDOE Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

In accordance with the laws of the Commonwealth of Virginia, Equality Loudoun has formally filed an objection to the “2022 Model Policies” proposed by the Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) in accordance with the Code of Virginia § 2.2-4002.1. Pursuant to subsection C, if a written comment is received during a public comment period asserting that the guidance document is contrary to state law or regulation, or that the document should not be exempted from the provisions of this chapter, the effective date of the guidance document by the agency shall be delayed for an additional 30-day period. Under this provision, we are calling on the Virginia Department of Education to immediately halt the implementation of this policy for 30 days, issue a review, and file a formal written response to our objection, citing the following:

VDOE is not using the proper procedure to adopt the 2022 Model Policies.  Because all Virginia school boards must set policies that are consistent with them, they set legally binding requirements and are not a guidance document but rather a regulation.  Therefore, the expedited process that VDOE is using for guidance documents under Virginia Code § 2.2-4002.1 is not appropriate.  Instead, VDOE must follow the more robust notice and comment requirements of the Virginia Administrative Process Act for regulations.

In addition, the 2022 Model Policies do not follow the requirements of Virginia Code § 22.1-23.3.  That statute empowers VDOE to adopt “model policies concerning the treatment of transgender students in public elementary and secondary schools that address common issues regarding transgender students in accordance with evidence-based best practices.”  However, some of the provisions in the 2022 Model Policies (such as the nondiscrimination and anti-bullying provisions) do not specifically address transgender students at all, and VDOE provides no evidence to show that any of the provisions in the 2022 Model Policies are best practices for the treatment for transgender students.  Moreover, VDOE does not refute or even address the substantial evidence cited by VDOE in support of the 2021 Model Policies.

Equality Loudoun objects to the Virginia Department of Education proposed “2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students in Virginia’s Public Schools” (“2022 Model Policies”).  We believe that, as VDOE found in adopting the “2021 Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Public Elementary and Secondary Schools” (“2021 Model Policies”), that transgender students may experience rejection as well as criticism that affects their emotional health and academic achievement because of societal prejudice and lack of awareness or understanding.

This, VDOE found, could lead to adverse mental health outcomes, harassment, lower academic performance, suicidal ideation, and homelessness.  The 2022 Model Policies roll back many of the protections for transgender students VDOE adopted in 2021.  We believe this is misguided and dangerous, given unique risks that transgender children face.

For these reasons, Equality Loudoun believes that the proposed 2022 Model Policies should be withdrawn, and at a minimum, VDOE is required to delay their implementation as required by Virginia Code § 2.2-4002.1.C. Equality Loudoun has issued its formal objection in the VDOE Public Comment Portal, via direct email to the Virginia Department of Education, and in a certified letter postmarked prior to the closure of the public comment period.

We await a response from the administration as well as the proper issuance of such guidance in accordance with best practices, medical guidelines, and the laws of the great Commonwealth of Virginia.


I strongly agree and support the proposed Model Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support this newly proposed Policies.


Protect our trans youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The governor needs to remember he was elected to be governor and focus on our state and stop traveling to campaign for other MAGA Republicans and hope to run for president. He is going to actively hurt a very vulnerable part of the population with these terrible policies. We have laws to protect human rights. Trans rights are human rights. We’ve fought court cases about bathrooms (Grimm). Medical professionals support the right to transition. Yet the governor somehow he thinks he knows better. We will remember this at the ballot box. Stand up for other’s rights. One day you may need them to stand with you. </p>


Oppose policies based on ignorance, fear and prejudice

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is political in nature. It has no sound medical nor behavioral basis. It represents ignorance not Virginia, and not America.  I realize that those who support the governor’s guidance think they are protecting something (as if their children or grandchildren will catch “transgender’ism” if they are exposed to it). But gender orientation is not an illness or disease that will spread if accommodated.  Rather it is an enduring part of the makeup of humanity that is as ancient as any other aspect of society.  This proposed guidance will cause very real damage to not just transgender Virginian children but also to the whole society around them.  In fact, it will cause the greatest damage in the very parts of our community that are most ardent supporters of the guidance because those are the least open minded, and most likely to create intolerance that leads to suicide.

I have faith and confidence in my children. - and I support them.  However, I’m concerned for the children of those who mistakenly support this guidance.  They are encouraging their own future tragedies.


Persecuting Trans Kids is a shameful political stuntTrans rights!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

When transgender students are denied access to facilities that align with their gender identity, they often avoid participating in sports, gym and refrain from using the bathroom altogether. Bathroom avoidance is a common problem for transgender students and is linked to medical problems and diminished educational outcomes. For instance, in a 2013 study conducted by the Williams Institute, 54 percent of transgender respondents reported some sort of health problem related to bathroom avoidance, including dehydration, urinary tract infections, kidney infections and other kidney problems.


Vehemently oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>These proposed model policies are contrary to state law and will be extremely harmful to transgender and nonbinary kids. Protect trans and nonbinary kids. RESCIND these model policies. </p>


VDOE's newly proposed Polices protect the rights of students and parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly agree and support the newly proposed Policies.


Trans kids are awesome and deserve the same respect we all want

<!DOCTYPE html>

The consequences of not affirming a child’s gender identity can be severe, and it can interfere with their ability to develop and maintain healthy interpersonal relationships. In the school context, that distress will also hinder a transgender student’s focus in class and ability to learn. The longer a transgender youth is not affirmed, the more significant and long-lasting the negative consequences can become, including loss of interest in school, heightened risk for alcohol and drug use, poor mental health and suicide. -Gender Spectrum et al., 2015, Schools in Transition—A Guide for Supporting Transgender Students in K-12 Schools 8 (2015)


STRONGLY SUPPORT GOV YOUNKINS TRANSGENDER POLICY

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy protects our children.  We can no longer teach or live the ways of the devil.  We must get back to the basics.  I suppose Governor Youngkin's Transgender policy.  </p>


Children belong to their parents, not the state!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you, Governor Youngkin, for giving parents their voices back when it comes to public education and matters that affect their children. Politicians must remember that being enrolled in public education, doesn't mean they own our children! Minors aren't allowed to buy cigarettes, purchase alcohol, drive a motor vehicle, or vote for public office, yet some politicians think those same minors are capable of making life-altering decisions without the consent much less even informing their parents of the intent to do so. Thank you for being a voice of reason in this mind-boggling situation. I pray your reform passes!


Oppose- This policy puts our most vulnerable kids at risk.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The model policy is assuming the transgender youth have parents who are supportive and non-abusive. If this model is enacted, you are putting transgender youth at greater risk for abuse and violence at the hands of their own families and others. Transgender youth are already at higher risk for suicide, mental health disorders, and homelessness due to lack of family support and abuse. This policy impacts the mental health stability of many transgender students, who will be faced with the uncertainty of having to potentially face unsupportive families and the consequences of being out, not only to their families, but also to peers, if a teacher chooses to use their dead name. This policy increased the risk of bullying and harassment of transgender youth. As a parent of a transgender youth, I am worried about my child's safety (emotionally, mentally and physically) with this model policy.  If enacted, the constant fear of being outed by school professionals would impact their ability to completely access academic curriculum, therefore impacting their right to a safe learning environment, which is a basic right. This policy does not protect our most vulnerable students, instead it puts them in greater risk. </p>


STRONGLY SUPPORT GOV YOUNKINS TRNASGENDER POLICY

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy protects our children.  We can no longer teach or live the ways of the devil.  We must get back to the basics.  I suppose Governor Younkin's Transgender policy.  </p>


It is a grave mistake to pass this.

<!DOCTYPE html>

It is a grave mistake to pass this.


Fully understand and support the proposed Policies.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Great start, Gov Youngkin! Please save VA from extreme Leftists.


Say NO to these policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

These policies will be extremely detrimental to the mental health of students, whose very lives will be put at stake if these policies are enacted. This could lead to students being beaten/killed by unsupportive family members or by bullies at school, or it might drive them to suicide. Students dying beecause they are unable to express themselves is the ppposite of being "Pro-Life", as is so often claimed by the people trying to pass these policies. Being Pro-Life means caring about people being able to live, and allowing them to have safe and happy lives, which these policies directly oppose.


Help youth SURVIVE by OPPOSING these policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the policies that are being proposed and ask VDOE to vote against them. These policy changes would be discriminatory and ignore data gathered from the state that these changes can lead to youth homelessness, lack of opportunities, lower mental health, and worse. They create further inequality in a state that is already struggling too much.

Youth should not be ‘outed’ in the same way doctors follow HIPAA policies. Our focus needs to be care and support instead of treating youth as objects or ‘lesser than’ people that need to be managed.


I Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans children deserve dignity, respect, and safety.


Let trans kids be innocent.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans children are already so misunderstood. We have all lost so many loved ones bc of a cruel world that is unforgiving to things traditional people don’t understand. Trust me so many trans kids are told about how ciswomen are “afraid to see the penis” or “being attacked by the tranny”, but the reality is trans people don’t want you to see their genitals! In fact usually trans people have to make sure no one could possibly see that for the fear of being hate crimed or even worse, murdered for being trans. Someone who shows their genitalia to others in the bathrooms is just called sexual harassment it is a separate issue from being transgender but is mentioned so often in this forum by transphobic or maybe just scared and uninformed citizens. But everyday these poor trans kids have their innocence taken away bc they have to sit and hear these awful atrocities people are afraid of A CHILD committing. You should fear the gym teachers in the locker room. Their has been so much worse of an issue with TEACHERS AND COACHES assaulting CHILDREN in locker rooms NOT trans people. I understand parents fears just realize what the true threat is to your children. That threat isn’t trans people! it’s pedophiles that ur afraid of!!!! Let trans kids keep their rights. Let America and more importantly VIRGINIA be a safe place for ALL. And reject our hateful past and create a safe place for all of us to call home. I’m proud to be from here and I don’t want that to change.


Governors Transgender School Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I am opposed to the governors stand. We no more choose our sexual orientations or gender identity than we choose our skin colors </p>


Support new policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support Governor Youngkin’s revised 2022 revised model policies on The Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools.  </p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>


Gov Youngkin’s new 2022 Policy to protect children in public schools and support Parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

I SUPPORT 100% Gov Youngkin’s excellent policies to Stand with parents in deciding what is best for their children. Minors change their minds frequently, as we all know from hour to hour, at times, and certainly from year to year. There was a case with a LC Friend’s daughter who had a double mastectomy at age 15, and by 17 wanted to be her original sex “herself”’again. However she will never be the same again, due to Loudoun County policies of secrecy and what is really turning out to be child abuse to the extreme. She can never Breast feed her baby, if she has one becausece it is no longer an option. Thst is a great sorrow to her now, after reading of the special bonding that facilitates. She never even considered that before. Minors need to grow up, before making life changing, lifelong scarring, decisions. Doing this behind parents backs is legal insanity, and extremely presumptuous. This mother found out about the operation( double mastectomy) on her 15yr old DURING THE PROCEDURE, when one breast was already OFF! Would you want that to happen to your daughter, and to you?? That is the truth of what is happening. It scars many. They found a willing monetary Doner so arranged it all without parents knowledge. Remember  she “transed” back by only 17! This all could have been prevented by WAITING UNTIL AT LEAST 18. She is scarred for life by Our tax payer funded public school’s of secretive sexual disfiguring , trans counseling and trans drug experimentation policies, which are very unacceptable, and a form of CHILD ABUSE, as well as PARENT ABUSE. Meanwhile students need a parent’s signature to take an aspirin or Tylenol!! THANK YOU Gov Youngkin for standing with the parents who care and love their children the most, and by NOT saying yes to everything.                        JCTC5


I Support the Governor's New Revisions

<!DOCTYPE html>

The original policy was too radical, and these new revisions make much more sense.  Parents AND taxpayers to have a right to determine what is being taught in the schools, and no one should be forced to do things that are against their beliefs.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin’s revised 2022 revised model policies on The Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools.  I strongly support the new policies’ removal of  language that encouraged school officials to follow procedures to essentially deceive parents when their children are making potentially life-altering decisions regarding their gender identity in a school setting.

I also support the updated language that acknowledges students and teachers can’t be forced into compelled speech that violates their constitutional rights, including First Amendment and religious freedom protections. These policy updates restore protections for basic constitutional, religious, and parental rights.


For the SAFETY of our children, we STRONGLY SUPPORT the 2022 Model Policies.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you Gov Youngkin for this new proposed legislation.


Caring parents oppose revised model policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please do not replace the original model policies developed in 2021 for the treatment of transgender students.   The Youngkin administration’s proposed replacement risks violation of both Virginia and federal law, and should not be adopted.  The Code of Virginia § 22.1-23.3 requires that policies be “in accordance with evidence-based best practices” and should comply with non-discrimination laws and protect students from bullying and harassment.  The proposed replacement does the opposite.  Practices in the proposed replacement policies would subject students to bullying and harassment.  The idea that teachers may hold religious beliefs that require them to publicly bully students is ridiculous.  I know of no religion that celebrates cruelty and torment.  If a teacher knew something about a student’s history that was traumatic, such as abuse by a family member that might have caused that student to want to use a name that differs from that of the abuser, should a teacher call them a name that reminds them of that pain just because that was a name that was on their birth certificate?  That is not a religious belief—that is the belief of a cruel tormentor who has no business working with children.  This is no different than reminding trans youth of a painful past, and in many cases exposing them to risks of bullying or violence from their peers.

Evidence shows that misgendering and deadnaming transgender youth results in direct harm to youth.  The proposed policies to do not allow teachers to address non-binary or gender-fluid students in a respectful way, but insist on using binary pronouns which are not appropriate for all students.   Our students are real people, with the real diversity that occurs across humanity, and deserve to be treated with respect and care.

Several of these practices espoused in the revised policies, such as failing to use the affirmed name and pronouns, or forcing students to use bathrooms that don’t match their gender identity, have been shown to result in increased assaults in school (Murchison et al. 2019), increased suicidal ideation or suicide attempts by students (Russell et al. 2018, Tankersley et al. 2021), and increased probability of incarceration of students (Rosentel et al. 2021).  I would hope that our VDOE recognizes that these are unacceptable outcomes and they should reject practices that lead to increases in bullying, assaults, suicide attempts, and incarceration.

It is a myth that trans students create risks for other students in schools. There are many examples of student athletes perpetrating sexual assault and harassment, but we don’t ban student athletes from using bathrooms or locker rooms nor do we prohibit them from using nicknames.  Schools should address problem behaviors, not categorize whole groups of students as problems.

Please reject the proposed model policies.  We do not need to waste taxpayers dollars in the lawsuits that will follow, or risk the health and safety of our youth, just to accommodate someone’s political desire for attention.  As a parent, I felt the 2021 policies were very pro-parent.  The proposed revisions are not pro-parent, but pro-bully.  Parents are being made to fear for their children through misinformation.  Most parents want all of our children to be safe in schools, and want our children to learn how to work others who differ from them, not learn to fear differences.   Please support Virginia families by rejecting the 2022 proposed policies.

 Murchison, G.R., Agénor, M., Reisner, S.L. and Watson, R.J., 2019. School restroom and locker room restrictions and sexual assault risk among transgender youth. Pediatrics, 143(6). e20182902

Rosentel, K., López-Martínez, I., Crosby, R.A., Salazar, L.F. and Hill, B.J., 2021. Black transgender women and the school-to-prison pipeline: Exploring the relationship between anti-trans experiences in school and adverse criminal-legal system outcomes. Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 18(3), pp.481-494.

Russell, S.T., Pollitt, A.M., Li, G. and Grossman, A.H., 2018. Chosen name use is linked to reduced depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, and suicidal behavior among transgender youth. Journal of Adolescent Health, 63(4), pp.503-505

Tankersley, A.P., Grafsky, E.L., Dike, J. and Jones, R.T., 2021. Risk and resilience factors for mental health among transgender and gender nonconforming (TGNC) youth: a systematic review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 24(2), pp.183-206.


I oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I find the proposed legislation to be harmful to young trans children and will not result in good relationships between children and their parents.


Promote kindness and respect, say "no" to the proposed changes

Our schools should be a safe haven where children are recognized as individuals who deserve love and kindness. The draft policy misses the mark.

The 2022 wording is filled with contradictions that will make the policy impossible to implement. For example, the policy claims to stand against bullying practices and later explicitly permits practices that are known to harm and belittle transgender youth – putting young people in harm’s way. It’s disheartening to review. It instructs schools to use best practices and then describes practices that have been shown to induce depression and suicidality.

It's heartbreaking to think the Youngkin Administration would disseminate a draft such as this for public comment and divide our community under the guise of doing something to support parents. Do you know what supports parents? Preventing suicide and depression among students in the state of Virginia! That's the best way to support parents. We want a safe and engaging learning space for ALL children, including transgender and non-binary children who deserve our love, support, and respect. Our schools should be places that set a good example of accepting people as individuals and helping students thrive and work together to build a loving community.Re: "Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools" (Please reject this policy revision)

<!DOCTYPE html>

Our schools should be a safe haven where children are recognized as individuals who deserve love and kindness. The draft policy misses the mark.

The 2022 wording is filled with contradictions that will make the policy impossible to implement. For example, the policy claims to stand against bullying practices and later explicitly permits practices that are known to harm and belittle transgender youth – putting young people in harm’s way. It’s disheartening to review. It instructs schools to use best practices and then describes practices that have been shown to induce depression and suicidality.

It's heartbreaking to think the Youngkin Administration would disseminate a draft such as this for public comment and divide our community under the guise of doing something to support parents. Do you know what supports parents? Preventing suicide and depression among students in the state of Virginia! That's the best way to support parents. We want a safe and engaging learning space for ALL children, including transgender and non-binary children who deserve our love, support, and respect. Our schools should be places that set a good example of accepting people as individuals and helping students thrive and work together to build a loving community.

Re: "Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools" (Please reject this policy revision)


Restore Parental Rights and keep our children safe!

<!DOCTYPE html>

For the safety of our children, I strongly support this new model policies.


DISAPPROVAL OF PROPOSED 2022 MODEL POLICIES

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am completely ashamed and disgusted by the transphobic rhetoric strewn across the 2022 Model Policies for Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Parents and Students of Virginia's Public School. I attended public schools throughout my childhood within Virginian counties and I have heard terrible stories about my transgender peers of their mistreatment by transphobic folks who believe their constitutional rights are being infringed upon because transgender people want their pronouns and basic rights to be acknowledged and respected. Now, as a nursing student at the University of Virginia, I continue to pursue my education as an advocate for inclusivity and diversity among all my peers and encourage others to do the same. The 2022 Model Policies for Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Parents and Students of Virginia's Public School is a clearly ironic complication of clauses that treat transgender students, parents, and teachers will no privacy, dignity, or respect. If a transgender student wishes to be called upon using their preferred pronouns within what is supposed to be a safe and inclusive location, their school, so be it. If anything, the model policies should be enforcing everyone to treat each other with kindness and respect, especially transgender folks. I vehemently oppose the new 2022 Model Policies and I hope my public comment has inspired a change in the direction the model policies should be moving towards.


Fully support the Governor and to prioritize the authority parents rights and religious freedom.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly support the new policies’ removal of  language that encouraged school officials to follow procedures to deceive parents when their children are making potentially life-altering decisions regarding their gender identity in a school setting.

I also support the updated language that acknowledges students and teachers can’t be forced into compelled speech that violates their constitutional rights, including First Amendment and religious freedom protections. Thank you for updating these policies to restore protections for basic constitutional, religious, and parental rights.


I Agree With The Governor

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent I do not want schools or the government making these kid of decisions for my children


Oppose 2022 Guidance Docs re: Transgender students

<!DOCTYPE html>

Singling out one very specific group (in this case trans kids and their families) is discrimination. Parents can teach their children whatever (religious) beliefs at home; school should be a safe, nurturing environment for children to learn how to exist in a world full of differences. Parents have always been encouraged to participate in the school system; educators have the professional expertise to educate and help students, not necessarily all parents are able to do this even when they mean well. When school is a safe space, children will be free to be themselves and learn critical thinking, thus developing into adults who help make the world better for everyone. We must not be ruled by the fear of what we do not know, we must continue our own education even as parents. Please drop this matter and use our state resources to help pay teachers more, recruit excellent candidates and fund public school programs that will help improve educational standards.


Support new pro-parent policies proposed by VDOE

<!DOCTYPE html>

Let's restore parental rights and keep our children safe.


I Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

My name is Cayla Celis, and I believe that the Model 2022 policies are wrong.

The Model 2022 policies are wrong because by requiring that a student's gender identity be affirmed and given permission by the student’s parents, the student may risk not being supported by their parents and be subsequently denied resources on their identity. In worst case scenarios, students may even risk their own safety by being forced to be out to their parents.

This, if enacted, will affect my friend’s ability to get counseling regarding gender identity, and if she wanted to get counseling, she would risk being out to family members who do not respect people going through the same issues as her.

For these reasons, I ask you to repeal the 2022 Model Policies and reinstate the 2021 Model Policies.


Parents must be involved

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly support the new guidance.  A good friend just attended a large-ish high school meeting with his son as his son is to be a new driver very soon.  He reports that the meeting was very well handled, and that PARENTS are told they are in charge.  Students are to listen to their parents, are to heed their direction, and parents have control AND responsibility.  Parents are to shepherd their students into becoming good safe drivers.  The entire meeting foot-stomped the important and critical role of parents.  If the school policy has this rightful parental emphasis on something as mundane as driving, how can school policy not also deeply involve parents in medical and psychological and emotional and SPIRITUAL issues such as questions of sex and gender.  Given that 80-90 percent of gender dysphoria cases are outgrown over time, it is ludicrous not to give parents every opportunity to allow their children to work thru these times without the imposition of drugs and surgeries with irreversible negative impacts.  For teachers to push kids into transition is completely wrong and deserves rebuke.  The strong evidence that much of the gender fluidity happening today is more of a social contagion than anything else also strongly argues for giving parents leeway to work through this difficult period with their child.  If strong parental involvement is the expected norm for student drivers, it had better be the norm for more intensely personal family issues, even if the relationships experience some rocky times.  School personnel will not be there for life for the student, but parents will.  Parents have the ultimate responsibility, and it is time for the schools to work within this constraint again.  I strongly support the new guidance.  Thank you.


Supporting Gov Youngkin

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support Gov Youngkins pro-parent policies. The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities. Therese policies also  protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students. </p>


New proposed legislation isn't anti-trans but protecting ALL children, I strongly support it!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thanks for the new proposed Model Policies for the treatment of transgender Students.


Dignity and Respect for All: Thank you!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for developing these model policies, which we fully support.


Oppose any policy designed to stare at children's genitals

<!DOCTYPE html>

It's government overreach


Fully support the 2022 Model

<!DOCTYPE html>

I fully support doing away with the 2021 model - it's completely unconstitutional as well as having no place in education. I'm not even going to type out all the reasons why - it's not necessary. Boys have a penis, girls have a vagina. Anything else is a trend. It's not discrimination saying that. If someone wants to live differently than the way they were born, then they can do so outside of the walls of the school. Policies shouldn't change for the rest of the students because a selected few have mental illness issues.


Strongly Oppose  Discriminatory 2022 Model Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a full-time student in Virginia and am writing in regarding the 2022 Model Policies. To be clear, I vehemently oppose the 2022 Policies on legal and moral grounds. These policies strip and dispossess students of their bodily dignity. By displacing gender identity from the child to the parent, they strip young people of their right to self-identity and treats this right as a "belief" that can be dictated by others.

From my own perspective, I am especially concerned about these policies because they will have real impacts on the safety of my peers. Transgender students fall victim to suicide at extraordinarily high rates - this is sure to exacerbate this issue, and the state is therefore willfully exacerbating the crisis.

I implore the state to reverse the change to the 2022 Model Policies immediately.


Against the policy proposals of Youngkin regarding transgender, nonbinary & LGBTQ students

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support protecting the vulnerable transgender, non-binary & LGBTQ students in schools by Not passing the policies proposed by Gov. Youngkin.  All students deserve to feel understood, safe, & accepted by school personnel and other students.


Fully support Gov. Younkin's Policy

As it has been reported in many places, e. g. the Sep. 2022 issue of the AARP Bulletin, in recent years there has been an unprecedented increase in the numbers of young people identifying as transgender, non-binary, or related identities. The magnitude of this increase is totally inconsistent with the likelihood of it being a result of the natural evolution of human sexuality and it's almost totally driven by an imitation impulse among impressionable minors with the aid of some agenda-driven adults, that is further fueled by the pervasive talk and glamorization of purely ideological gender identity notions without basis on the science of human biology.
Although the trend is most likely a fad that will go away in the future, the damage that has caused and continues to cause will be hard to repair, to wit:the relegation of outstanding girl athletes off winner podiums in competitions where biological males are allowed to compete as girls; the trauma caused to young people forced to share restrooms with persons claiming a different gender than their biological sex, as if bodily functions were not a biological fact, but a mere cultural construct, like all of gender ideology is; the resulting confusion among some preteens and teens about what they really are versus what the current fashion says they might be; and so on.
The policy proposed by Gov. Youngkin represents a minimal step in trying to correct the harm that's being caused by the confusion about human nature and human behavior resulting from past policies that have tried to enshrine a totally false notion of who and what people are, even trying to keep parents off their natural role as guides and protectors of their offspring, as if the United States were a totalitarian State where the State has control over the lives and minds of the people.
In the very few instances in which students who are actually affected with gender dysphoria might be involved, there surely are multiple ways of protecting their persons and taking care of their needs, other than the blanket policies currently in effect.

<!DOCTYPE html>

As it has been reported in many places, e. g. the Sep. 2022 issue of the AARP Bulletin, in recent years there has been an unprecedented increase in the numbers of young people identifying as transgender, non-binary, or related identities. The magnitude of this increase is totally inconsistent with the likelihood of it being a result of the natural evolution of human sexuality and it's almost totally driven by an imitation impulse among impressionable minors with the aid of some agenda-driven adults, that is further fueled by the pervasive talk and glamorization of purely ideological gender identity notions without basis on the science of human biology.

Although the trend is most likely a fad that will go away in the future, the damage that has caused and continues to cause will be hard to repair, to wit:
the relegation of outstanding girl athletes off winner podiums in competitions where biological males are allowed to compete as girls; the trauma caused to young people forced to share restrooms with persons claiming a different gender than their biological sex, as if bodily functions were not a biological fact, but a mere cultural construct, like all of gender ideology is; the resulting confusion among some preteens and teens about what they really are versus what the current fashion says they might be; and so on.

The policy proposed by Gov. Youngkin represents a minimal step in trying to correct the harm that's being caused by the confusion about human nature and human behavior resulting from past policies that have tried to enshrine a totally false notion of who and what people are, even trying to keep parents off their natural role as guides and protectors of their offspring, as if the United States were a totalitarian State where the State has control over the lives and minds of the people.

In the very few instances in which students who are actually affected with gender dysphoria might be involved, there surely are multiple ways of protecting their persons and taking care of their needs, other than the blanket policies currently in effect.


Strongly Oppose the 2022 proposed model policy on the treatment of transgender and non-binary youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a resident of Virginia with family and friends who are transgender. I strongly oppose the proposed 2022 Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.

These policies will harm students. Requiring teachers and school staff to "out" students to their parents can put students in real danger especially if they do not live in a supportive and affirming home. Suicidal ideation and attempts are already high in the trans and gender non-conforming population. School should be the last place that children in these groups feel unsafe and unsupported.

Teachers already affirm cisgender students by using the "nicknames" they prefer. Prohibiting teachers and school staff from affirming trans students by addressing them by their affirming names, excludes those students from the dignity and respect already being shown to other students. Are not all students deserving of the respect and dignity of being addressed by the name that affirms them, without requiring parental/guardian involvement?

Prohibiting students from using bathrooms that align with their gender is inhumane. These model policies target trans students for exclusion and discriminate against them.

These policies completely fail to meet the statutory requirements of 22.1-22.3 of the Code of Virginia and are NOT in accordance with evidence-based best practices.

They fail to ensure that all students will experience a safe and supportive learning environment free from discrimination and harassment.

I oppose these proposed policies and they should be withdrawn as soon as possible.


This is a terrible policy decision.

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is a terrible policy decision.


Support For These Policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

We must support this initiative in favor of the family and our children's diligent and coherent education.


I support our trans and gender expansive students and community

<!DOCTYPE html>

Protect the civil rights of every student. Show every child that our world is loving and inclusive, a safe place to become who they dream to be. Prevent discrimination. Promote equality!


I strongly oppose these meddlesome restrictions

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I oppose these restrictions that limit the rights of young Americans. Why should the governor or anyone else tell another person what name he should be called? You are meddling in the rights of other Americans just because you don't agree with them, and that is wrong. If even ONE child decides he feels safe and comfortable enough at school to go by another name and be accepted for who he is, rather than end his life through suicide, all the discomfort of those who feel uncomfortable around people who are different from them will be worth it. Too many elected officials want to limit the rights of others while proclaiming their right to have what they want. Do not limit the freedoms of other Americans under the pretense of saying you know what's best for them. </p>


I support this policy.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for restoring rights to parents to care for their children.  These topics are not such that they should be handled by school admin.  They are situations that require the loving care of parents who truly know their children.  I totally support this policy put forth by Youngkin.

Our children are not political agendas.  They are unique individuals that are precious and need to be cared for by their parents.


Comment on 2022 Model Policies, with further argument and proposal linked.

<!DOCTYPE html>

     During the years of schooling, whether public or private, primary or secondary, children start to discover who they are. Part of everyone’s identity is made up by their gender, no matter how big or small of an impact it makes on their identity, and many gain a strong sense of their gender identity during these years. This realization can bring a great deal of hardship to those with gender identities differing from societal norms for that person’s sex assigned at birth, also known as being transgender, or not cisgender. But these difficult times can be greatly alleviated with a safe space to socially transition into an identity that more accurately reflects who they are. So if a student doesn’t have a safe space at home, no matter the reason, many children will turn to their school lives for a chance at a safe space to be who they are. For the health and safety of students, schools should ensure children have this safe and inclusive environment, rather than ensuring an extension of a discriminatory home environment, just as child protective services and other child-related government agencies do for any other case of a child being raised in a harmful household.

     Put shortly: the problem isn't school's hiding a child's identity from parents; the problem is children not trusting their parents enough to tell them who they are.

     Link to further argument, proposal, and preliminary research:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1b532CQc2Zt8oEj2xgPyJRxn3M1Z3SOZooOYBHUNlQRY/edit?usp=sharing

Terms and Definitions:

Sex - the physical set of reproductive organs that an individual has, categorized into male, female, and intersex.

Sex assigned at birth - the set of reproductive organs that were present during an individual’s birth.

Intersex - an adjective describing a state where an individual has more that one complete or incomplete sets of male and female reproductive organs

Gender - the identity that an individual has concerning the social construct around an individual’s sex, including gender identities that do not subscribe to the idea of a man and woman binary gender system.

Transgender - an adjective describing the state of when one’s perceived or actual gender is not in what is typically seen as “agreeing” with the sex assigned at birth for the individual, whether known to the public, to family of the individual, to the school system, or to the individual themselves.

Non-binary - an umbrella term falling under the larger umbrella of transgender, where one does not strictly identify as a man/boy or woman/girl. This includes bigender, agender, genderfluid, genderqueer, and other identities not conforming with a definitive gender binary.

Cisgender - an adjective describing the state of when one’s perceived or actual gender is typically seen as “agreeing” with the sex assigned at birth for the individual, whether known to the public, to family of the individual, to the school system, or to the individual themselves.

     The above definitions are for use in this comment only. They are not to be used as total descriptions or definitions for all uses, but instead are to be used to develop a more consistent understanding of different terms relating to this field across multiple groups or views. These definitions may require additional explanation or detail for some cases, and are not final.


Support for this change

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support the updated language that acknowledges students and teachers can’t be forced into compelled speech that violates their constitutional rights, including First Amendment and religious freedom protections.

Please finalize these updated 2022 model policies as written without removing any of the key protections to restore parental involvement in the process and protect children’s privacy and safety rights.


Support Governor Youngkin's model policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents providing legal documentation regarding their child's gender makes sense. Isn't everything else in a child's school life also based on parent approval and documentation? I wouldn't call that discrimination, I would call that logical. Thank you, Governor, for providing a model to help school leaders act consistently.


Mental Health

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy of enacted will kill students. Trans students are already statistically more likely to commit suicide due to societal and parental pressures to fit in with the norm. Forcing school staff and teachers to call a student by their dead name will already reinforce the idea in their heads that they are the problem- which undoubtedly will result in an increase in mental health issues.  The government at a bare minimum should make policies that don’t maliciously attack a minor group- especially just to score points when running for president.  Presidential ambitions are not a good reason to kill trans kids. Politics is not a game, it actually affects real people.  </p>


I oppose these homophobic policies.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Let kids be who they are, it keeps them safe. </p>


Equality for transgender & non-binary youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I am writing here today to oppose the proposed policies regarding the transgender and non-binary youth. These are people who should be treated like any other being and deserve a safe space to be in. </p>


Thank you Gov Youngkin !

<!DOCTYPE html>

The newly proposed guidance is spot on.


I support the restoration of parental, religious, and constitutional rights.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly support the new policies’ removal of  language that encouraged school officials to follow procedures to essentially deceive parents when their children are making potentially life-altering decisions regarding their gender identity in a school setting.

I also support the updated language that acknowledges students and teachers can’t be forced into compelled speech that violates their constitutional rights, including First Amendment and religious freedom protections. Thank you for updating these policies to restore protections for basic constitutional, religious, and parental rights.


In full opposition of these policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Trans rights are human rights, even for children. I cannot wait for you to be voted out of office. </p>


Support for Gov Youngkin’s policies for parental rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly support the new common sense policies by Governor Youngkin.

Parents should be supported in raising their children not undermined.                  Parents rights must be protected by the government not overruled. Parents have the most concern for their children and their future. They should always be consulted on any decisions related to their children. Parents should be informed about all aspects in regard to the child's well-being, including gender identity choices.

It’s important to support parents rights  but also to protect children from poor decisions. Children cannot make reasonable decisions about changing their gender at such early ages. If they want to change their gender as adults, they will have the opportunity then.Hopefully as adults they will seek counseling to understand the ramifications to such a change.

God didn’t make a mistake about a child’s gender.  Human errors may have impacted a child gender and/or mental health regarding gender, but God makes it clear in our genes as to which gender we really are. Animals are not confused about their gender.  They don’t look to change their gender and their genes also testify of their exact gender.

 Gender identification pronouns should not be forced upon teachers, students or parents.  People should not have to keep track of other people’s gender confusion. All people should be respectful to one another and not  harass or bully someone for their gender or gender confusion.  This is true for any differences people have; we all need to respect and value one another.  We can do that with love, not requiring gender pronouns.


Thank You for Supporting Parents and Kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for removing the prior administration's destructive policy against children and their parents.  It is well established that gender dysphoria is a social contagion that most kids grow out of.  I've read the testimonies of many adults who were railroaded into having their bodies mutilated as children in the name of "affirming care" and how they now wish just one adult would have spoken up to protect them.

This "affirming care" is a most horrible form of child abuse. Parents have a primary, natural right to care for and protect their children. The government has no natural authority to place a wedge between parents and children or to facilitate medical child abuse.

I absolutely support policies to prevent school teachers and administrators from lying to parents about their child's emotional health, particularly when such life altering decisions are on the line. It makes no sense that a child cannot choose to drink alcohol but would be allowed to decide in favor of sterilization. Truly, only a eugenicist could support such decisions.

I am also glad that the new policy respects teachers' natural right to free speech and does not force them to engage in hateful and destructive behavior by using pronouns opposite of a child's sex.  Affirming a psychological disorder is deeply unethical and is hateful in so far as it removes all hope of health and wholeness.

I support leaving schools free to make local decisions regarding bathrooms and locker rooms rather than mandating a one size fits all approach. Healthier decisions are made in freedom with parental input.

Please finalize the 2022 model policies without removing any of their protections for children, parents, and school staff.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a Virginia resident and urge the Board of Education to reject the 2022 model policy regarding the treatment of transgender students.

-- The policy is premised upon the idea of 'parental rights,' but it rolls back protections for trans kids that were fought for BY PARENTS.

-- If this new policy were really about parental rights, it would allow parents to request that the school accommodate and support their child regardless of gender.

-- If this new policy were really about parental rights, it would allow parents to support their child's identity without the undue burden of filing paperwork over nicknames and pronouns.

-- And most importantly, if this policy were really about supporting students, it would be based on the extensive research on gender identity and how to reduce depression, suicide and discrimination. Instead, the policy ignores research.

This policy is invasive and unnecessary and I urge the board to reject it.


<!DOCTYPE html>

VA needs this new legislation to keep our children SAFE.


Vehemently opposed to anti-trans model policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is absolutely horrible. It aims to harm children. For what purpose? And, how are my parental rights supported by this policy given that I want my children to be respected fully for who they are. If they identify as trans or have friends who do, those children should have their identities respected in school. As a parent, I want to see that, so how are my parental rights supported here? And, why would government even have any say in a child's identity?  We have a mental health crisis among young people, this will only exacerbate the mental health challenges of trans children. Especially those living with parents who would reject their identities. Why force them to have their identities denied at school as well? This is simply cruel and has no legitimate government purpose.


Gov Youngkin is spot-on in saving our families and children from language that deceives parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

Re Governor Youngkin's Model Policies 2022, I am in full support of his removal of language that encouraged school officials to follow procedures to essentially deceive parents when their children are making potentially life-altering decisions regarding their gender identity in a school setting. It lacks common sense to allow young children make these types of decisions when they are not fully emotionally, intellectually, physically, or spiritually ready to make these kinds of life-changing decisions--much less hide them from the parents. We thank Gov Youngkin's efforts to protect our children and our families! In addition, children should use the facilities which correspond to their biological sex, with the exception that schools should look for common-sense changes for the transgender students who request access to private facilities corresponding to their gender identity. Finally, schools should require approval from parents before any of the parent's children's names and/or pronouns are changed. Thank you for this opportunity to comment!


I OPPOSE these restrictive guidelines.

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a Virginia parent I believe this is more about discrimination than parental rights.


Support policy that prevents my daughter from having to see penis and balls in her locker room

<!DOCTYPE html>

Governor, the woke mob is running our schools. The woke mob would roll over anyone to pass their agenda. Please don’t allow them to further harm our children. Allow our kids to experience the joy of youth.


Trans supporting parents have rights, too

<!DOCTYPE html>

These guidelines actually allow teachers to override the wishes of parents who support their trans children by  claiming 1st amendment rights over the use of correct pronouns. Governor, did you even consult the psychiatric community before drafting this?


<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a parent and a resident of Virginia. I strongly oppose the proposed 2022 Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools.

These policies will harm students. Requiring teachers and school staff to "out" students to their parents can put students in real danger especially if they do not live in a supportive and affirming home.  Suicidal ideation and attempts are already high in the trans and gender non-conforming population.  School should be the last place that children in these groups feel unsafe and unsupported.

Teachers already affirm cisgender students by using the "nicknames" they prefer.  Prohibiting teachers and school staff from affirming trans students by addressing them by their affirming names, excludes those students from the dignity and respect already being shown to other students.  Are not all students deserving of the respect and dignity of being addressed by the name that affirms them, without requiring parental/guardian involvement?

Prohibiting students from using bathrooms that align with their gender is inhumane.  These model policies target trans students for exclusion and discriminate against them.

These policies completely fail to meet the statutory requirements of 22.1-22.3 of the Code of Virginia and are NOT in accordance with evidence-based best practices.

They fail to ensure that all students will experience a safe and supportive learning environment free from discrimination and harassment.

I oppose these proposed policies and they should be withdrawn as soon as possible.


Completely SUPPORT!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

We need this new proposed policies to protect our kids.


Strongly oppose the 2022 guidance policy

Kara McClurken, parent and community member

<!DOCTYPE html>

I know and love transgender and non-binary young people--they are my neighbors, my family, and friends of my children.  This guidance will harm our most vulnerable students and exacerbate the mental health issues already experienced by these students. Study after study has proven that transgender and non-binary children who have the recognition and support of their community are much less likely to suffer mental health issues/attempt suicide.  Transgender and nonbinary youth who reported having pronouns respected by all or most people in their lives attempted suicide at half the rate of those who did not have their pronouns respected.

For some children, school may be their only safe place.  Instead of helping to keep school a safe place, this policy will do the opposite for our trans and non-binary children.  Misgendering will happen on a daily basis.  Bullying and harassment will be able to occur without accountability.  It will even prevent students from having a say in what name they go by—something that will affect not just trans and non-binary students, but any student who prefers to go by something other than their legal name.  It will write into our guidelines discrimination and harassment and will make school an even more difficult place for our most vulnerable students.  This policy, if it moves forward, will hurt people I care very deeply about and may even put their lives in danger.

All our students should have a safe and supportive learning environment from discrimination and harassment.  This policy will destroy that safe and supportive learning environment for our transgender and nonbinary students.  It will destroy that safe and supportive learning environment for their cisgender friends as well who care deeply about them—for when a friend is harassed, they will feel it as well.   This policy, if passed, will send a message to our kids that the schools and our communities do not care about them and will not keep them safe.

The VDOE should reject this draft policy.


Fully Against

<!DOCTYPE html>

The proposed policies only serve to alienate the trans and non-binary population in Virginia and they aid absolutely nobody.

I am a non-binary graduate of a Virginia high school that will be impacted by these policies. In high school, I ran cross-country, joined the science club, and I was in the homecoming parade. I was a complete nerd who got an A in every class I took, so I promise I understand biology. I did not come out in high school because the idea of non-binary people where I come from is met with dismissal and sometimes mockery. It was not something even considered real, so I can say many of these schools are already far enough behind when it comes to helping every kid feel accepted. My identity is something I cannot change, and I know the same is true of kids across this state trying to figure out who they are.

It's ironic that these policies are framed around "protecting kids and parents" when in reality it takes real agency away from kids trying to pursue the life they need to thrive. Trans kids are not predators who are a danger in bathrooms. That is a statistical fact. Female athletes are not at risk of losing everything to trans girls because trans girls lose all the time just like everyone else. Sports policies need to accommodate differences, not just shut people out. Parents under the influence of the bigotry and transphobia they've been manipulated into feeling by the news don't deserve the right to stop kids from making their own choices in school. These schools are not grooming anyone when kids change their name or pronouns. Nobody wants more trans or non-binary kids because they're going to exist anyway. That is, they are going to exist if we allow them to flourish because the epidemic of teen suicide includes the trans kids who don't see an end to their isolation and dysphoria.

These policies only hurt any progress we've made towards more loving communities. They are malicious and outright dangerous. Schools should support the children growing up there, not bigotry,


Let parents decide what's best for their children!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin's efforts to keep government from assuming the role of parent:

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from their parents. Under the new policies,     school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


Disagree strongly

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>These guidelines will be harmful to students. Some parents are not supportive - some kids are not safe expressing who they are. Furthermore, referring to a trans student by the pronouns they were assigned at birth, rather than the gender they really are, is disrespectful and invalidates their sense of self, making their gender dysphoria worse. </p>


100% Support this!

<!DOCTYPE html>

This comment of full support for returning parents rights is directed to the town hall board:Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools


Yes to parental rights!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parental rights are of paramount importance to not only our freedom, but more importantly the well being of our children. I support Gov Youngkin restoring these rights to parents!


Don't treat my grand-daughter-in-law like she's sick

<!DOCTYPE html>

My grand-daughter-in-law is a transsexual (M2F). Before she decided to be female all the time she was glum and not very pleasant to be around. Once she decided to go ahead and be a female, she had her driver's license changed (DE is good about that), changed ger name, and began to dress like her chosen gender, She has become happier and much more social, and a joy to be around. Transsexual is NOT something someone chooses to be, it is something someone IS. Forcing them to be what they don't want to be and treating them like they are sick is just cruel!


New proposed Policies protect the First Amendment rights of students.

<!DOCTYPE html>

All students have their rights to stay safe.