Protect Emotionally Vulnerable Children and Parental Rights!

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Bowman
PO Box 181
Blue Grass, VA 24413

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Kathleen Bowman
<br />PO Box 181<br />Blue Grass, VA 24413<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148772531" width="1" height="1" />


Absolutely support 2022 model policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you Govenor Youngkin-yes pass this!


STRONGLY SUPPORT GOV. YOUNGKIN 2022 Model Policy. - Protection of children and rights of parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a mother and a grandmother I STRONGLY support Gov. Youngkin's 2022 Model Policy. It is an absolutely right and common sense decision. Children, especially girls, need to be safe in the bathrooms and locker rooms. Also, parents should be the ones who decide what is best for their children. I completely agree with  and support Gov. Youngkin's  2022 Model Policy. He is making the right decision.


OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am submitting this comment in opposition to the proposed 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools (the “2022 Model Policies”). These policies are not only in direct violation of state and federal law, but they also deny the rights of students, parents, and school personnel to recognize the inherent dignity and worth of every child.

All children have the right to learn in a safe and supportive environment that respects their humanity and upholds their dignity. However, the 2022 Model Policies send a dangerous message that some students do not belong, and in fact, should not exist. This archaic view on how we should treat people who are "different" has no place in Virginia in the year 2022 and beyond.

Being transgender is not and should not be a religious or political issue. Discussing or educating others about the life experiences of a transgender person is not and should not be religious or political. Transgender people are human beings who deserve respect and safety, as does anyone of any other gender identity. In addition, children are not objects incapable of making decisions about how they would like to be treated. Children are human beings who deserve respect and safety. Therefore, transgender children, non-binary children, and children who are questioning their relationship to gender deserve respect and safety, whether or not their parents, teachers, or fellow classmates agree.

Transgender individuals across the country experience high rates of sexual and domestic violence victimization, death by suicide, and homicide. Studies have consistently shown that policies like those proposed result in more frequent and escalating harassment, discrimination, and physical violence toward trans and nonbinary students. These policies also lead to significantly higher rates of depression, suicidal ideation, and suicide attempts relative to cisgender students. The consistent misgendering of a student has a profoundly negative impact on their ability to learn in the classroom. Denying trans and nonbinary students from using facilities that match their gender identity increases the prevalence of sexual assault victimization.

The evidence is clear – students will experience higher rates of sexual assault, peer victimization, and suicide if policies like these are adopted in Virginia.

I stand with all of the gender expansive individuals in Virginia and those who are in their support networks who are having to navigate these traumatizing attacks against their wellbeing and overall existence. The 2022 Model Policies will significantly and irreparably harm Virginia’s students and families, and, as an anti-violence advocate, I firmly oppose their adoption.


Full Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Why would any government body (school) have the authority to hide life-altering personal mental health information from a child’s parents?


Strongly Oppose!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Strongly oppose these harmful policies!! These polices attack the LGBTQ+ community. The VDOE and Youngkin are wrong. This is not about parental rights. This is about human rights. Don’t adopt these horrible policies!!!!


OPPOSED - Please research how affirming trans youth helps protect their well-being

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please see the below statistic from The Trevor Project:

"42% of LGBTQ youth seriously considered attempting suicide in the past year, including more than half of transgender and nonbinary youth."

"Transgender and nonbinary youth who reported having pronouns respected by all of the people they lived with attempted suicide at half the rate of those who did not have their pronouns respected by anyone with whom they lived."

"Affirming transgender and nonbinary youth by respecting their pronouns and allowing them to change legal documents is associated with lower rates of attempting suicide."

"94% of LGBTQ youth reported that recent politics negatively impacted their mental health."

https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2021/


I strongly oppose these model policies - they will hurt trans and non-binary children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I strongly oppose the model policies. Erasing trans and non-binary children from the classroom will create a more hostile environment for these children. The self harm and suicide attempt rate for these youth is already devastatingly high, and these policies will only put the youth at an increased risk of self harm due to being marginalized. As a health care professional, our youth’s health should be our number one priority.  </p>


Accept transgender students for what they are

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I OPPOSE the guidance.  Any human being who declares himself or herself to be transgender and/or binary must have a compelling need to do so, given the difficulties this imposes on his/her/their life.  The world needs to accept and adjust.  Compassion and common decency demands it.  </p>


Gov. Youngkin's Proposed Changes to School Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I completely agree with and support all of the Governer's proposed changes regarding schools.


Entirely proper approach

<!DOCTYPE html>

People don't like "sovereignty" - each wants to do what he likes regardless of the consequences and outcomes for others.  We operate according to moral codes in order to ensure respectful treatment of everyone.  Under the U.S. Constitution, in which the U.S. and the states are parallel forms of government, the U.S. has certain powers and the states have others, as to which each is supreme within its own sphere.  The states are tasked with regulation of public health and welfare, education, public morals, and the police power, for example.  So it is entirely proper that the Commonwealth, as regards its duty to regulate education, health (including children's mental health), and public morals, enact legislation that requires agents of the Commonwealth such as school staff, to secure consent before taking action that the Commonwealth may be deleterious to the child's well being.  It is important to remember that persons under the age of majority are legally incapable of giving consent except where specified by statute, and only their parents or legal guardians can consent on their behalf.  And, since statutes of limitations for intentionally wrongful acts committed against a child are tolled until the age of majority, school officials could be facing civil liability more than a decade from now for damage suits brought by former students, even where those students were in full agreement with the actions taken, and they won't have the defenses of waiver or consent..


Strongly oppose this hurtful policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is a disturbing policy regression that Is rooted in transphobia will only bring harm and division to trans and nonbinary kids and to the community. This is not in the interest of the children of the Commonwealth and should be wholeheartedly rejected by any decent, compassionate government and community. Shameful example of politicizing an issue at the expense of the larger public good.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose this in the strongest possible manor.


The 9/16/22 draft model policy from Gov. Youngkin & Va. Dept of Education

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Please don't pass the draft model policy.  Keeping the existing model policy that was enacted in 2021 will not endanger anyone. Removing it will: It will put trans and non-binary students in harm's way. These kids are most at risk and need protection. </p>


Support Parental Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Support Parental  Rights </p>


Strongly support!

<!DOCTYPE html>

School policy

It is very important that all students, parents, teachers and school staff be treated with dignity and respect even though there may be disagreement on an issue. The new policy takes a more balanced approach in the treatment of transgenders without violating the rights and freedoms of other students, parents, teachers and school staff.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose these policies. Policies like these kill, traumatize, and marginalized trans students. It’s disappointing to see that while students are taking a stand against policies like these, adults are promoting them. This policy is nothing more than grade-school bullying enacted into law.

A person’s right to present as and identify as their gender should be inviolable. Teachers should respect their student’s gender identity, and schools should give them the support trans and gender non conforming students need. Furthermore, this policy assumes that parents have the right to overrule their child’s gender identity. They should not. Trans kids need to be given space to transition to their gender identity, even if the parents disagree. Kids are not the property of their parents; they are autonomous individuals who deserve respect. Going forward with this policy is state-sanctioned child abuse.

Oppose these policies are support trans youth.

Marie


Opposed - this policy is harmful to youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

This proposed policy disempowers youth and reduces their right to self expression. It's backwards thinking and harmful to a population that already experiences disproportionate mental health challenges in addition to bullying and discrimination.


HIWASSEE TRANSGENDER VOLLEYBALL PLAYER SEVERELY INJURES FEMALE HIGH SCHOOLER WITH SPIKE TO THE FACE

<!DOCTYPE html>

So sad that liberals would destroy girl sports to pass their agendas.


Support policy that prevents my daughter from having to see penis and balls in her locker room

<!DOCTYPE html>

Our poor children. Stop this nonsense. The woke mob would run over little kids to progress their agendas.


Opposing Trans rights repression

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This proposed trans policy is similar to the rights being stripped away by the Supreme Court around abortion rights.  Largely bigoted religious fears are being used to design policy.  This hurts trans kids and families and only serves advancing a hate agenda.  Respect privacy, respect trans human rights. </p>


You are the best governor ever. Thank you Governor Youngkin!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for protecting girls in their bathrooms.


Protect ALL Children - Oppose the "Model" Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the "model" policy proposed by Gov. Youngkin regarding trans and bi-sexual youth in schools.  These children, including my nephew, are already vulnerable to bullying and other forms of discrimination, and are significantly more likely to harm themselves than other children.  To create a policy that further ostricizes them and makes their difficult lives more difficult in school is completely unacceptable!


100% support the protection of women's/girls rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Stop discriminating against girls. </p>


Support Parental Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

 I support the Youngkin administration proposal overhauling those 2021 rules and replacing them with Model Policies that uphold parents’ God-given and constitutional right to guide their child’s development.


Support Parental Rights


Support parental rights


Protect Trans Kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

These proposed model policies are contrary to state law and will be extremely harmful to transgender and nonbinary kids. Protect trans and nonbinary kids. RESCIND these model policies--they endanger kids. KEEP TRANS AND NONBINARY KIDS SAFE.


Governor Youngkin for President!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for being the adult in the room. Our kids appreciate you.


I strongly oppose the proposed 2022 Model Policies on transgender youth!

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a medical student and lifelong resident of Virginia, I strongly oppose these proposed policies. Transgender and gender diverse youth already have tragically high rates of suicidality and abuse, and these proposed policies will only make this worse.

First, the fact that NO legislation limiting the rights of trans youth has successfully passed should tell you that this policy is absolutely WRONG for Virginia. Second, this entire policy is hypocritical and contradictory to itself, as outlined below. Third, seeing public comments in support of this policy by declaring that they want to bring God back into PUBLIC schools shows how unacceptable this is - what happened to freedom of religion???? Finally, trans and nonbinary youth already have heartbreaking rates of suicidality, and this policy will make it worse.

Purpose

The stated purpose is to create a school environment that is free from discrimination, harassment, and bullying, with protection and respect for all students. This policy does not achieve any of these goals.

The fundamental right of parents to direct the care of their children does not take precedence over a child’s safety.

The 2021 Model Policies is criticized to promote a specific viewpoint. By enforcing the scientifically false belief that gender is the same as sex, this proposed policy is also promoting a specific viewpoint.

The 2021 Model Policies is reported to have over 9,000 comments, and in the first day of the public comment period, this proposed policy has received over 16,000 comments, largely in opposition. If this policy claims to take public comments into consideration, it must consider the comments made directly regarding this policy

Guiding Principles

A1“Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs” - The referenced US Supreme Court cases of Troxel v Granville, Wisconsin v Yoder, and Pierce v Society of Sisters refer to matters of familial visitation and the right to withdraw from public school - not a parent’s right to deny their child’s identity and access to critical health services, such as gender counseling. In fact, minors in the state of Virginia have the right to consent to certain health services, including those for mental health, without parental permission.

A2“Schools shall defer to parents to make the best decisions with respect to their children” - It is well documented that trans youth have significantly higher rates of suicidality, especially if their family is unsupportive. Although parents have the right to advocate for their child, schools should not be mandated to prioritize a parent’s personal belief over the child’s well-being.

A3“Schools shall keep parents informed about their children’s well being” - Parents do not have the right to be fully informed about all matters without limitation regarding their child’s health. According to Code of Virginia § 54.1-2969, minors may consent without parental permission or knowledge to: testing and treatment of venereal disease; services required in case of birth control, pregnancy, or family planning with exception of sexual sterilization; treatment or rehabilitation for substance abuse; services needed for treatment or rehabilitation for mental illness or emotional disturbance.

D “Schools shall respect all students” - Discrimination on the basis of sex includes discrimination against trans students, as established in Bostock v Clayton County, Georgia and Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board

Statutory Authority and Requirements

This section references the legislation passed to protect trans youth. This new policy does not meet the standards required by that legislation, as it does not: comply with applicable nondiscrimination laws; maintain a safe and supportive learning environment free from discrimination and harassment for all students; protection of student privacy and the confidentiality of sensitive information

Terminology

Defining “sex” as “biological sex” to refer to sex assigned at birth is reductive and a severe simplification of scientific and medical knowledge. The Department of Education should not make policies regarding sex that completely disregard individuals who exist outside of the male vs female binary.

Defining “transgender student” as a student with a parental request is neither scientifically nor medically accepted. Children are not simply a vehicle of expression for their parents and have identity formation of their own, as early as age two. The separation of sex assigned at birth and gender has also been well established in science and medicine.

The terms “persistent and sincere belief” to identify a transgender student, implies that some transgender individuals are impersistent or insincere about their own identity.  This is derogatory wording and should not be included in an educational policy.

Development

B. The policy states that the role of parents is well established and beyond debate, which is outright incorrect. We are constantly debating parental rights in child protective services cases and in discussion of the rights of minors. Although the state cannot strictly define what “the well-being of a child” consists of, the state can and has defined dangers to a child. Misgendering a child is mistreatment and dangerous to a child.

C. This policy references the First Amendment to forbid requiring teachers and students to use correct pronouns. Yet, this policy requires teachers and students to use incorrect pronouns without parental permission, which by this logic, is also forbidden by the First Amendment. Additionally, the fact that gender is a personal experience is not an ideological belief, but is well established in science and medicine. Of note, gender is not a “choice” in that children can be forced to “change their minds.”

F This policy requires school boards to create policies that are aligned with the policy as well as state and federal laws. This is not possible because this policy contradicts state and federal laws. The 2021 Model Policy clearly outlined how its recommendations aligned with state and federal law.

Additional Related Laws

This section lists a variety of laws relevant to discrimination and the treatment of trans youth, many of which this policy violates despite including said laws in this section: the First Amendment of the US Constitution, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Code of VA § 2.2-3900, Article I, Section 11 of the Virginia Constitution, and Grimm v. Gloucester County School Board.

Resources

This section uses sources from the CDC, NCJRS, SAMHSA, and StopBullying.org to discuss the importance of parental involvement in their child’s education and well-being. All of these national organizations also emphasize the importance of fostering the well-being of trans youth via acceptance and belonging.

Appendix 1

This model policy is egregiously lacking compared to the 2021 policy. In fact, this proposed policy eliminates every effort in its predecessor to create a nurturing and supportive environment, apathetic to the psychological and physical consequences to our transgender and gender-diverse youth. This policy claims that, “All students have the right to attend school in an environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying,” yet persecutes children by denying them their identity. Any policy that directs teachers and staff to mistreat their students in this way is discriminatory at best and deadly at worst.

In mandating schools to inform unsupportive parents of their child’s identity, this policy obliterates the one affirming space a child may have and increases the risk of suicide and abuse by unnecessarily provoking parental hostility and rejection.

It bans any measure to affirm a child’s identity without written parental instruction by requiring school employees to use the student’s legal sex and name instead of affirming their pronouns and name. This extraordinarily harmful mandate has no legal basis. The referenced US Supreme Court cases of Troxel v Granville, Wisconsin v Yoder, and Pierce v Society of Sisters refer to matters of familial visitation and the right to withdraw from public school - not a parent’s right to deny their child’s identity and access to critical health services, such as gender counseling.

The proposed policy mandates students to participate in extracurricular activities  and use bathrooms according to their assigned sex, despite legal precendent considering this unlawful discrimination (excluding athletics). This policy even cites this legal precedent immediately after making this mandate, effectively nullifying itself.


Oppose


Oppose the 2022 policies on Transgender students! They model disrespect and cause harm.

<!DOCTYPE html>

The 2022 Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools will not meet the needs of all students!

As stated by the National Association for Educators: “Every student matters, and every student has the right to be safe, welcomed, and valued in our public schools. Educators know firsthand that school-based discrimination against transgender students harms them profoundly by stigmatizing them and denying them equitable educational opportunities.” Adoption of the 2022 policies will be school-based discrimination. In an environment that purposely denies students the right to be themselves, how can they be expected to be treated equitably, learn, or even feel safe?

According to data by the NIH, 86% of transgender youth reported suicidality. “School belonging, emotional neglect by family, and internalized self-stigma made a unique, statistically significant contribution”. Educators and Mental Health experts agree that when trans individuals feel accepted and are supported by their schools and family, then their emotional mental health stabilizes, suicidiation is lessened, and learning increases. When students do not feel supported, when they experience harassment and even violence, “these high levels of victimization result in these students missing more school, receiving lower grades and feeling isolated and not part of the school community”. And it is not just from other students: “a third of transgender students heard school staff make homophobic (32%) remarks, sexist (39%) remarks, and negative comments about someone’s gender expression (39%) sometimes, often, or frequently in the past year.” Students and staff need to be held accountable for being respectful, which includes honoring students’ chosen name: “It’s practical to support young people in using the name that they choose. It’s respectful and developmentally appropriate.”

The 2022 policies state that “The Department is mindful of constitutional protections that prohibit governmental entities from requiring individuals to adhere to or adopt a particular ideological belief.” Yet, these 2022 policies are forcing the belief that there is something wrong with trans students; that those who disagree with a student’s pronouns or identity are the ones who are right rather than the student themselves (i.e. forcing their ideological belief onto others). This belief models disrespect and harms the learning environment for all students, especially our already vulnerable trans students.

Oppose the 2022 policies.


STRONGLY Support Parental Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>We STRONGLY support parents' rights to make the decisions for their children!  The education system should be a support to the family unit.  We do not agree with our children being taught "trans" ideas or allowing it to be part of the education process.  In addition, the integrity and fairness in sports needs to be protected by safeguarding our children.  </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a parent to three children in VA public schools and a future school counselor. This policy is not only harmful, but it also completely ignores the human rights of our students. I believe that all students deserve to feel safe and supported in our schools. Treating every child walking through our doors with dignity is at the core of the mental health profession. When we recognize LGBTQIA+ students’ agency over their lives and educational experience, we have an opportunity to create inclusive and safe spaces where young people are listened to and considered in the decision-making process.


Support Revised Policies - The Custody, Care and Nurture of a Child Resides with Parents

Todd Gathje, Ph.D., The Family Foundation

<!DOCTYPE html>

On behalf of The Family Foundation, I express our support for the 2022 Revised Model Policies on The Privacy, Dignity, and Respect For All Students and Parents in Virgin’s Public Schools (“model policies”), to the extent that they respect the primacy of parents regarding decisions concerning their child’s education and upbringing, protect teachers and administrators from being compelled to speak in violation of their religious convictions or conscience, and seek to protect the bodily privacy and safety of all students.

Need for Repealing the 2021 Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students

The Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students, published by VDOE under the Northam Administration in 2021, violate the legal rights and responsibilities of parents, jeopardize the bodily privacy and safety of students, and pose a significant threat to teacher and student free speech. Among the many reasons to repeal the 2021 policies are that they:

Encourage schools to keep secrets from—and outright deceive—parents. They also encourage kids to lead a double life, putting them in the precarious position of hiding vital and potentially life-saving information from parents.

Open the door to the state punishing parents as “abusers” for simply expressing genuine, good-faith concerns about their young child prematurely embracing an opposite-sex identity.

Jeopardize the privacy and physical safety rights of students - especially female students—by allowing students to use opposite-sex bathrooms, locker rooms and changing facilities without any documentation.

Force school employees and students to use specially-declared pronouns or face punishment for discrimination and harassment without any religious protections.

Mandate instruction and promotion of a politicized form of “transgender” ideology that is completely unsubstantiated by scientific evidence.

Statement of Facts

The science is clear that there are two biological sexes - male and female – which cannot be altered using any form of modern technology. Notwithstanding certain abnormal genetic mutations, it is well documented that the normal complement of human chromosomes is 23 pairs—22 pairs of autosomes and one pair of sex chromosomes. Females have two X chromosomes, and males have one X and one Y chromosome. The sex-determining region on the Y chromosome is the SRY gene. If the SRY gene is present the embryo develops as a male, and without it an embryo develops as a female.

The Fourteenth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution provides that every citizen in the United States shall receive equal protection, which includes treating each student equally and free from discrimination.

Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, which forbids discrimination on the basis of sex by educational institutions, still permits the separation of students by sex in sleeping quarters, bathrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities.

Article I, Section 11 of the Virginia Constitution: States in part “the right to be free from any governmental discrimination upon the basis of religious conviction, race, color, sex, or national origin shall not be abridged, except that the mere separation of the sexes shall not be considered discrimination.”

The law in Virginia clearly affirms the primacy of parents’ authority in Va. Code § 1-240.1, which states that “A parent has a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the upbringing, education, and care of the parent’s child.”

Pursuant to Virginia regulation 8 VAC 20-620-10 regarding school guidance and counseling services, no student shall be required to participate in any counseling program to which the student's parents object.

The U.S. Supreme Court has on numerous occasions reaffirmed the rights of parents:

“The liberty interest …. of parents in the care, custody, and control of their children is perhaps the oldest of the fundamental liberty interests recognized by the Court.” (Troxel v. Granville, 2020)

“The child is not the mere creature of the state; those who nurture him and direct his destiny have the right, coupled with the high duty, to recognize and prepare him for additional obligations.” Pierce v. Society of Sisters, 268 U.S. 510, 535 (1925).

“It is cardinal with us that the custody, care and nurture of the child reside first in the parents, whose primary function and freedom include preparation for obligations the state can neither supply nor hinder.” Prince v. Massachusetts, 321 U.S. 158, 166 (1944).

“We have believed in this country that this process [teaching, guiding, and inspiring by precept . . . young people into mature, socially responsible citizens], in large part, is beyond the competence of impersonal political institutions. Indeed, affirmative sponsorship of particular ethical, religious, or political beliefs is something we expect the State not to attempt in a society constitutionally committed to the ideal of individual liberty and freedom of choice.” Bellotti v Baird, 443 US 622, 638 (1979).

“Simply because the decision of a parent is not agreeable to a child or because it involves risks does not automatically transfer the power to make that decision from the parents to some agency or officer of the state. The same characterizations can be made for a tonsillectomy, appendectomy, or other medical procedure. Most children, even in adolescence, simply are not able to make sound judgments concerning many decisions, including their need for medical care or treatment. Parents can and must make those judgments.” Parham v J. R., 442 US 584, 603 (1979).

Courts have also issued rulings protecting the free speech rights of educators.

The Sixth Circuit ruled that an Ohio university professor’s free speech rights were violated when they disciplined him for refusing to refer to a male student as a woman and use female pronouns. Meriwether v. Hartop, 992 F.3d 492 (6th Cir. 2021)

The Virginia State Supreme Court upheld a Loudoun County Circuit Court ruling that the Loudoun County public schools violated the free speech rights when they disciplined him for publicly expressing his opposition to a proposed gender-expansive policy and stating he could not be compelled to say speak messages that violated his conscience.  Loudoun County School Board v. Byron Tanner Cross.

Strengths of the Revised 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity and Respect for Students and Parents

The revised model policies make important declarations about family values and parental rights, including:

“Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs”

“Schools shall defer to parents to make the best decisions with respect to their children”

“Schools shall keep parents informed about their children’s well-being”

The revised model policies also make necessary changes that comply with state and federal law, respect the rights of parents to oversee their child’s health and education, and seek to protect the bodily privacy and safety of students.  Below are some of the critical improvements.

Eliminates the list of subjective “gender identities” and correctly states that “sex” means biological sex, an understanding that is supported through scientific analysis and centuries of cultural tradition (II. Definitions, p. 14).  The “gender identities” so popular today are not biological sexes – they are merely determined by the feelings of the person claiming the gender identity and therefore cannot be claimed as biological fact.

Prohibits any form of harassment and bullying towards any student – which should not be tolerated - without awarding extra privileges to only some students.  This policy change ensures that every student is treated equally under the law as guaranteed by the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. (III. Model Policies, Sections A. and B., p. 14-15)

In requiring schools to make available guidance and counseling resources, they reiterate that a parents must be given the opportunity to excuse their child from any counseling for which they object. (III. Model Policies, Sections A, p. 15)

Respects the primacy of parents regarding the education, health, and upbringing of their child by ensuring that parents:

approve any changes of a students’ name or sex in a student’s official record (III. Model Policies, Section C, pp. 15-16); and

are involved in decisions regarding the way their child is identified by school personnel and students, and the use of bathroom or changing facilities (III. Model Policies, Section D., p. 16-17).

Adds language that students participate only in the athletic program or activity that corresponds with their biological sex (III. Model Policies, Section H., p. 18). Currently, if a student athlete meets certain criteria – which amounts to a statement from a medical professional that the student is “undergoing” gender transition, they may be granted permission by the VHSL to participate on an athletic team of the opposite sex.  According to VHSL, since the policy was enacted in 2014, they’ve heard 28 appeals in which 25 were granted.  That means currently there are male athletes participating on girls’ athletic teams, robbing young girls from a spot on a team or playing time, or risking their overall safety.

VI.       Conclusion

The Department’s revised model policies adhere to fundamental principles, comply with current state and federal law, and follow court rulings reaffirming the fundamental rights of parents to direct the education and upbringing of their child.

Public schools must not be a place where the values and teachings of parents are undermined when their child goes to school. We cannot afford to allow schools and school personnel to use gender ideology to harm children and to create a wedge between parents and their children.

For the reasons stated above, The Family Foundation supports the revised 2022 Revised Model Policies on The Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virgin’s Public Schools.


Opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

If anyone running the law was actually concerned for the well being and safety of children then this would not even exist. Outing trans children to potentially transphobic guardians could get them killed (abuse, murder, suicide, etc). Misgendering and ignoring their identity would break them. Forcing them to stay silent about it will weigh on them for years, and possibly the rest of their lives. The identity and expression of someone else is no yours to dictate. You're going to kill children if you pass this.


Supporting Governor Youngkin's Proposed Guidelines on role of parents in Public Education

<!DOCTYPE html>

We strongly support the rights of parents to be involved in the education of their children. We believe, as parents, that we have the right and duty to keep our children safe to the best of our abilities both inside and outside of school, including on school field trips, at sports events, and in school bathrooms. Therefore we approve of guidelines that allow girls to be accommodated in girls-only bathrooms, in girls-only dorms, and to compete in girls-only sports. The recent debacle of two sexual assaults on school property in Loudon County only   strengthen that need.

We are grateful that Governor Youngkin and the Department of Education support guidelines that will keep children safe and we strongly support the adoption of the proposed guidelines.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

The governor is boasting that this new policy puts the focus back on parents and their rights when it comes to their child. Looking over this policy, I believe there is indeed a focus on parental rights, but not ALL parents. As a parent of a trans child, I feel extremely limited in what I can do to protect my child based on this policy. If fact, I feel hindered. This policy may protect the parental rights of parents of cis kids but it definitely does the opposite for someone like me.
For example, after I’ve gotten my child’s name changed and pronouns updated (after providing legal documentation) and the school has made the appropriate changes to their file, it really doesn’t matter. No teacher or student has to actually adhere to their name or pronouns. And so when my child is deadnamed and misgendered, what parental rights do I have? What can I do? Nothing. Because this policy allows the outright bullying of my student. And I can’t protect them from it.
this policy is so incredibly harmful to an already vulnerable group of kids. Please don’t make it harder for them. Trans kids aren’t the enemies. They’re just kids.


SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from their parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.


This is a terrible policy decision.

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is a terrible policy decision.


I OPPOSE this “guidance”

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This protects no children and actively harms some of the most vulnerable. I strongly oppose any efforts to ban children from receiving gender-affirming care and determining their own identities. </p>


Strongly support Parental Rights- Thank you to Governor Youngkin

<!DOCTYPE html>

Only parents should be able to guide their children in transgender and sexual orientation matters. Thank you.


Protect Children through Parental Rights and Responsibilities

<!DOCTYPE html>

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex at birth. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>We wholeheartedly support the Governor's revision and our rights as parents of our children! As a resident of Annandale, Virginia I strongly support Governor Youngkin's approach to this issue. </p>


Is there a middle ground?

<!DOCTYPE html>

While I generally support parents' rights, I think there are distinctions that can and should be considered by age group.   I think we can make the case that elementary school kids want and need their parents’ involvement and guidance, while most tweeners and teenager want and need the freedom to explore themselves and the world from many perspectives.  I would consider adding such distinctions in this document.

Bathrooms to me is a difficult issue.  Students who are truly Gender different than birth sex should be allowed where they are most comfortable, but I also understand the fear that there could be abuse of such policies so some level of vetting would be required.  I believe vetting could be worded and included in policy leveraging counselors that are available at all schools.

The most difficult part of this document for me to read is section V-C (pasted below).  Characterizing a person’s gender preference as an ideological belief seems misguided at best.   There is plenty of literature out there on gender preference as fact, not belief.  This section and any reference to it should be removed in my opinion.

“C. These 2022 Model Policies adhere to the First Amendment. The First Amendment forbids government actors to require individuals to adhere to or adopt any particular ideological beliefs. Practices such as compelling others to use preferred pronouns is premised on the ideological belief that gender is a matter of personal choice or subjective experience, not sex. Many Virginians reject this belief. Additionally, the First Amendment guarantees religious freedom and prohibits compelling others to affirm ideas that may be contrary to their personal religious beliefs.”

In closing, I believe any government guidance that moves from freedom towards oppression should be considered very carefully, children are the future of the country, and we need them to be supportive of our government.   Declaration of independence sums it up nicely…..unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.


Support Parents Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Gov. Younkin and parents rights to be the primary decision makers and educators of our children.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please please move forward not backward in our state regarding any and all forms of discrimination.  The data is clear. Support these kids

Rate of depression and suicide is absolutely unacceptable in these kids.  Horrible policy.  Focus on inclusion and tolerance, as well as the many very serious issues facing our schools, teachers and learning obstacles.


Strongly support Gov Youngkin and this measure. Parents decide these issues, not the state/teachers

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This is a logical policy shift that protects the parents rights while still maintaining first amendment protections. </p>


Strongly oppose!

<!DOCTYPE html>

The previous guidance document from Governor Northam’s term did not need to be revised. I strongly oppose the proposed changes. These changes do not protect trans and no -binary youth, and will cause additional harm to this vulnerable population.


Parents are not replaceable

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Neither the state, nor teachers should be reaching their hands into homes. Parents know their children best, and no matter how much a teachers cares, they cannot measure up to or replace a parent. Only parents can make appropriate decisions for their children's medical care. </p>


Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is a disgraceful policy that creates unnecessary burdens on every party while dehumanizing and distressing a group of people with no real goal. I strongly oppose.


SUPPORT!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please implement this new model policies for the protection of our children.


Trans Kids Exist And We Should Support Them

<!DOCTYPE html>

Pretending trans kids don't exist isn't going to harm anyone but the kids in question. And pretending to support "parental rights" when what you really mean is that you only support the rights of "some" parents (a.k.a. those that agree with you) is trash. Passing this is a mistake and I oppose it.


Support 100%

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>It is disturbing that it has come to the point where parents have to fight for the right to know and guide their own children.     The school is NOT the parent and never should be.   We are not a communist country where the state controls everything.   The home and family is sacred!  </p>


Completely SUPPORT!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Gov Youngkin and the new Model policies which protect parental rights and the students.


This guidance document is Dangerous

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Being transgender or non-binary is not a crime, nor a punishable offense. This policy that has been proposed will put a larger target on the backs of queer youth, and open the door for abuse from peers, teachers, and parents. It is dangerous to encourage teachers and administrators to openly misgender and deadname their students, just because some parents refuse to accept their own children for who they are. As an ally to the transgender and nonbinary community, it makes me both furious and disappointed that we have to fight these bigoted politicians that are determined to strip these marginalized groups of their human rights. No child should have to suffer through their days at school, wondering if the world will ever accept them. If this policy is enacted, schools will be a place where children face violence and persecution, instead of a safe haven that some children look forward to in order to escape the treatment they already face at home. When will we, as human beings, be able to accept our differences, instead of trying to oppress our own people? Stop trying to reverse time and accept these progressive changes. The children are our hope for the future, and they deserve respect. </p>


Opposed. Stop trying to hurt Trans and non binary children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Younkin you are a only putting children in harms way. Let them be who they need to be to thrive. </p>


Protect Trans Youth!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The policies proposed can wreck irreversible harm on so many children. While not trans, I know what it feels like to view school as a safe space and to view teachers as supporters when parents cannot be. Schools and teachers can help children feel heard and safe, especially when they do not feel this way at home. Knowing that they will be forcibly outed will likely lead many trans youth to stop approaching teachers for support and will result in severe mental harm and possible physical harm. This policy is transphobia masked as caring about parents' rights. Real parents won't create an environment where their child feels unsafe. </p>


Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Support 100% -- we have to stop teaching our children at such young ages that there is no such thing as being a boy or a girl...no more theys and thems...crazy.


My entire family opposes these proposed policies.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>As a therapist I've worked with several trans and non binary children and youth. These kids just want to be safe to live their lives, and we the adults should do everything we can to make this happen. I have three kids, two who are school aged. They face no danger from their trans and non binary classmates. If these policies are implemented then they are in daily danger of learning homophobia and how it is okay to not consider others. This is unacceptable. All Virginians deserve better. When we protect the most vulnerable groups we make it so that those groups who aren't inherently vulnerable are even safer. Do the right thing and rescind these policies. </p>


Support mental health care for suicidal kids- not a free pass to girl’s locker rooms and restrooms.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please protect our children from the woke mob that will steam roll over children to get move their agenda forward.


It is a grave mistake to pass this.

<!DOCTYPE html>

It is a grave mistake to pass this.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>These proposed model policies are contrary to state law and will be extremely harmful to transgender and nonbinary kids. Protect trans and nonbinary kids. RESCIND these model policies. </p>


SUPPORT!

<!DOCTYPE html>

TOTALLY support!...Well done Gov. Youngkin!....common sense legislation.


Restore parents' rights;protect children

<!DOCTYPE html>

I totally support the new 2022 proposed policies.  It is the parents' right to raise and train their children.  The state education bureacracy deserves NO role in this matter.  Grave harm results to children when the teachings of their families and religious faiths are countermanded by teachers or other education officials.  Don't harm the majority of students in an effort to cater to a small minority of questionable behaviors.  If the LGBTetc community suspects danger to one of their own, it should be reported to the authorities and steps taken to remove that student from danger.  But don't endanger the typical student by forcing them to accord with behavior their parents and faith teach is wrong.


Oppose - Please protect our trans youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This proposed policy is extremely harmful to the well-being and mental-health of Virginia's trans-youth. Not all parents are accepting of their trans kids. These youth deserve to be seen and identified for who they are. Preferred names and pronouns can be essential to identity. We need to support our trans youth wherever we can, based on their identity, not their parents' possible prejudices. </p>


OPPOSE! OPPOSE! OPPOSE!!!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Don’t tell us how much you love all babies, then tell us how much you hate gay people as these policies imply.

Stop trying to use coercion to steer us back to your hypocritical sense of “Christianity.”

You ran on lies and deception. Pray for your soul. You are the worst governor ever!


Strongly Support children and parents by supporting this model

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I believe that supporting parents rights, and supporting and loving transgender students are not mutually exclusive things.  As a parent, I want to know the things going on in my kid's life in school that affect them greatly.  I don't believe a school has higher moral authority to make decisions with my kids than their own parents.  Even if the school disagrees with a parent's philosophy.  However, I in no way support showing hatred or bigotry to students who are struggling with identity.  I think this model carries the balance well between the two ideas.  There is no reason to equate parental rights with bigotry.  </p>


“Parental rights,” my butt!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

How shortsighted of you! Not all of us are so dumb to fall for this.

While this might work if the parents are loving and supportive,  but what if they aren’t? Then what? You may end up with blood on your hands.

What basis do you have to overrule all of the major psychological associations that have designed standards of care for trans minors over the last several decades?


Strongly SUPPORT! Thank you Governor Youngkin!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents should be involved in their kid's lives. The schools are not raising the children, and should not be keeping secrets about their wellbeings from their parents.


Parents Know Their Children Best: Educators Must Support Parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

We, as parents, teach our children to respect others, period.  Even as they go out into the world of school and sports and other activities, this basic tenet does not change, and our role as parents continue.  Gov. Youngkin's proposed policies uphold this basic right to be our children's guide.  Why oppose these policies? Why support the Northam administration's  policies that undermine our rights?  Why give up your right to help your children? Think, and support your right to be a parent to your children!


Strongly oppose proposed Virginia DoE policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a father of three children attending Virginia public schools, I cannot oppose these proposed Virginia DoE policies strongly enough. These proposed policies are a solution to a perceived problem that will have profound negative impacts on my children and their classmates's ability to master subjects in preparation to contribute as educated, thoughtful, aware citizens.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose this in the strongest possible manor.


Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Support 2022 model policies


Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I'm transgender. I am now living a full, happy life with no regrets or doubts about who I am, but I struggled in a school system that was unsupportive at best and dangerous at worst when it came to respecting my human rights. You don't have to be trans to recognize why this policy is in bad faith and will further endanger students, not protect them. The VDOE needs to focus on real issues instead of attacking innocent students. Reject this policy. Thank you to all the allies who are standing up against hate. </p>


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stop forcing one set of beliefs on all. Protect transgender students. STRONGLY OPPOSE


100% approve 2022 model policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Pass 2022 common sense model policies </p>


<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents have the right to make decisions with respect to their children: Policies shall be drafted to safeguard parents’ rights with respect to their child, and to facilitate the exercise of those rights.

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


Gender Dysphoria is a serious matter - Parental Notification and Permission is critical

Concerned Mother of School Age Children in Virginia

<!DOCTYPE html>

I agree that parents should be notified by the school should their child request to be identified as the opposite sex and/or change their name.  Gender Dysphoria is a very serious matter, and it is critical parents are notified by the school in a timely way if their child wants to be called a different name or set of pronouns at school.  This is the very least that should be required of schools.

I also agree that our schools should then require that children have parental permission to change their name or identify with the opposite gender at school.  This type of psychosocial "transition"  can be incredibly harmful even though it is not a surgical or hormonal step.  Once a child requests their friends and teachers call them the opposite gender, it is nearly impossible to back away from once started should the child have a change of heart.  So having a parent's knowledge and permission is crucial before embarking on such a far reaching step.   See the study done by J. Restore and T.D. Steensma, "Gender Dysphoria in Childhood" (which shows over 85 percent gender dysphoria desistance rate.)  Basically, when we exercise patience and caution whilst treating any other overlapping mental health issues versus immediately affirming children with gender dysphoria, they often change their minds.  This seems like a wiser approach than the immediate embrace of affirmative therapy that is being championed right now.

I also agree that we should be concerned with how all the other children in school are affected by those children who are suffering from gender dysphoria.  No child should be forced to go along with something that goes against their intellect, conscience or religious beliefs like calling a child who is clearly one biological sex the opposite biological sex.  Nor should any child have to suffer a child of the opposite biological sex in their bathroom.

I think we can manage handling what should be a rare medical issue compassionately on a case by case basis without detracting from the intended purpose of school.   Schools should not be a place for special interest group activism.


SUPPORT!!  Thank you!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Public schooling should be about EDUCATING kids, not indoctrinating them in controversial subjects.  I've heard our Virginia school board say they're not that interested so much in "achievement" but that they're very focused on kids reaching "their dreams".  I doubt the individual who said that would want a physician treating them who wasn't held to high "achievement" standards throughout their education.  Some of us are actually trying to raise future leaders and contributors to the common good rather than victim-obsessed me-monsters.  I will absolutely pull my high-achieving children out of the public school system depending on how far the "equity" initiatives go, because I want them to have a QUALITY education AND because I don't want my own children to face fear and distraction at school simply because our religious views don't align with the juggernaut that is taking over their classrooms (namely special interest activist groups).  School boards across this nation are increasingly "othering" students who hold to certain biblical views and while I personally have been holding on, hoping for the moderation that I believed the public square would demand, I'm increasingly alarmed and believe we are on the cusp of a mass exodus of high performing students from these school systems.  In a few years, when test scores have even FURTHER tanked, maybe students like my kids will be missed.  Regardless, the experimentation on kids and groupthink that has taken over these boards by people who consider themselves "bastions" of moral superiority is outrageous.  One of our own school board members called people "the r word" during a meeting in which she claims to be fighting for the inclusion and empowerment of all.  It's a joke.  I applaud Gov. Youngkin's efforts to restore and protect PARENTAL RIGHTS!!! </p>


Strongly support

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Thank you for passing these common sense guidelines.  All children need protection, and parents are their best advocates.  This is one of those things that children in middle school and high school don't appreciate, until they are out on their own, and especially when they have their own children. </p>
<p> </p>


Parents envolvement in the schools.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly feel that parents should be involved in their school children’s education. This is very important and parents raised or are raising these children that they love and care for daily. I feel the teacher is there to teach them and give them an education which will be reinforced, or should be enforced in the home. I do not feel teachers should have a say so over the parents.


I support govenor youngkin 2022 model policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Please pass 2022 model policies </p>


Protect our children

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly support Gov. Youngkin’s proposal to correct all the evil and wrongful policies corrupting the hearts and minds of our innocent children. God help us!


Oppose


Proposed "Student Policy"

<!DOCTYPE html>

Gov. Youngkin's proposed policy is entirely unnecessary to "student safety," and, in fact, it makes many students targets of new isolation, bullying and harassment. It is a cheap shot at making schools and students actually safer, a cynical vote-getting ploy.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

strongly oppose. Protect trans kids


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent with two children in Virginia's public schools, I strongly oppose the proposed guidance. Every child deserves to feel safe and welcome at school - but the draft policy would deny that right to trans and nonbinary kids, encouraging rather than combating the stigma, exclusion, and mental health challenges they too often face.

I suggest following science and medicine on the need to support kids - not political agendas.  Instead of battling the issue of pronouns, please direct attention to the issue of lack of social services, mental health services, and gun safety - all much more pressing issues and central to creating a safe environment for kids


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

ALL youth are important and ALL belong. I strongly oppose anti-trans policies in schools. Of all places, schools are where our children should feel the safest and most supported.


OPPOSE Updated Student Policy

Governor Youngkin and the VA Department of Education,I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed student policies that would reverse gender-affirming practices in Virginia public schools.Public schools should be a place where students feel welcome, safe, and included. They should not be places where a student fears being ostracized due to their gender identity, outed to their parents, or being subjected to treatment that is harmful to their wellbeing. Families and students who desire an educational environment that conforms strictly with their personal beliefs have access to private schools for that purpose. Gender-affirming practices are demonstrated to reduce the risk to non-binary youth. By reverting these policies, you are actively placing students in harm’s way. This change is purely political and in no way considers the mounting body of scientific evidence around this issue. I urge you, and the counties of Virginia, to reject this change.Thank you,Laura Brumsey

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Governor Youngkin and the VA Department of Education,\n\nI am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed student policies that would reverse gender-affirming practices in Virginia public schools.\n\nPublic schools should be a place where students feel welcome, safe, and included. They should not be places where a student fears being ostracized due to their gender identity, outed to their parents, or being subjected to treatment that is harmful to their wellbeing. Families and students who desire an educational environment that conforms strictly with their personal beliefs have access to private schools for that purpose. \n\nGender-affirming practices are demonstrated to reduce the risk to non-binary youth. By reverting these policies, you are actively placing students in harm’s way. This change is purely political and in no way considers the mounting body of scientific evidence around this issue. \n\nI urge you, and the counties of Virginia, to reject this change.\n\nThank you,\n\nLaura Brumsey"}'>Governor Youngkin and the VA Department of Education,

I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed student policies that would reverse gender-affirming practices in Virginia public schools.

Public schools should be a place where students feel welcome, safe, and included. They should not be places where a student fears being ostracized due to their gender identity, outed to their parents, or being subjected to treatment that is harmful to their wellbeing. Families and students who desire an educational environment that conforms strictly with their personal beliefs have access to private schools for that purpose.

Gender-affirming practices are demonstrated to reduce the risk to non-binary youth. By reverting these policies, you are actively placing students in harm’s way. This change is purely political and in no way considers the mounting body of scientific evidence around this issue.

I urge you, and the counties of Virginia, to reject this change.

Thank you,

Laura Brumsey


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Oppose
Protect their rights.


OPPOSE


This is a terrible policy decision.

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is a terrible policy decision.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans rights are human rights! Protect the privacy of the trans community, no matter their age!


I very much oppose the 2022 proposed policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am hoping and praying that the Virginia School Board can protect our trans students by rejecting the 2022 policy. Parents of trans children who cannot accept their children as trans are endangering them, and the 2022 policies will cause more mental anguish and suicidal behavior than our already over-burdened schools and health facilities and families can support. Please take the wise course and stop this bullying of trans kids by the current Virginia governor. Thanks


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose this legislation which unnecessarily targets youth in our schools. All children and youth deserve respect and space to explore and development their unique identities that they will take into the world. We should focus on providing support for schools and teachers so they can be equipped to support these youth without sacrificing the quality of education in our schools.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans Affirming school policies are absolutely life saving. As an educator I’ve seen this first hand. It’s 100% essential that we oppose anti-trans policies in schools. Our students deserve the respect and a safe space to be themselves.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

This move will cause immeasurable harm & abuse to children who are in unsafe home environments & only seeks to isolate & “other” children for simply being who they are, taking away any support or safety nets they have. Govt efforts need to be put towards more productive matters that benefit our students instead of causing harm.


Please increase the protections for transgender children. Continue to allow parents to make medical

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Please make sure that parents, not you,make medical decisions for their children. </p>


Oppose

Students feeling safe at school has time and time again been a factor in academic and social success. When we create school environments that are actively discriminatory and harmful to students who are already vulnerable due to social stigma and ostracizing from peers, we are fundamentally creating inequitable and unsafe spaces that will detrimentally affect the emotional well-being of trans and gender non-conforming students. It does not harm anyone to use a student's pronouns or call them by their name but it does harm our students when they are forced to hear names over and over that spark dysphoria and emotional distress simply to appease a loud and intolerant minority and gain political clout. Using a student's pronouns and name does not cause psychological trauma, even if your religious beliefs tell you it is wrong, but there are numerous studies about the trauma inflicted by being referred to by deadnames and misgendered. Do we prioritize the values of a time long past that was inherently discriminatory or do we embrace the diverse possibilities of the future? Clearly, our governor has dictated that the past should become the present, an erroneous decision if there ever was one and one that is done to gain the favor of the ultra-conservative wing that has overrun the Republican party in a coup d'etat. For all the cries of data-based decision making in education, why not consult the data now? It would tell you that this model policy is not just wrong, but evil and dangerous.Forcing students to be outed to parents who are not supportive places them both in a dangerous situation at school and at home. Unlike our illustrious governor's view that we need to encourage those students to trust their parents, as he told a reporter after the model policy was released, those of us who are queer know that there is an inherent danger in telling even those close to us about our identity. That same danger is amplified for student who are trans or gender non-conforming when they are unable to find safe spaces where they can be themselves without fear of punishment.As a higher education educator, I am thankfully not forced to abide by these archaic and dangerous policy changes that will ultimately have disastrous and heartbreaking consequences but my heart breaks for the students who no longer see school as a space where they are valued for who they are, not who society expects them to be because of a letter on their birth certificate. Our trans and gender non-conforming students should be able to be their true selves in our classrooms and hallways so they can flourish and thrive, just like their classmates. I vehemently oppose this so called "model policy" and encourage its immediate rescission for the safety of our students.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Students feeling safe at school has time and time again been a factor in academic and social success. When we create school environments that are actively discriminatory and harmful to students who are already vulnerable due to social stigma and ostracizing from peers, we are fundamentally creating inequitable and unsafe spaces that will detrimentally affect the emotional well-being of trans and gender non-conforming students. It does not harm anyone to use a student's pronouns or call them by their name but it does harm our students when they are forced to hear names over and over that spark dysphoria and emotional distress simply to appease a loud and intolerant minority and gain political clout. Using a student's pronouns and name does not cause psychological trauma, even if your religious beliefs tell you it is wrong, but there are numerous studies about the trauma inflicted by being referred to by deadnames and misgendered. Do we prioritize the values of a time long past that was inherently discriminatory or do we embrace the diverse possibilities of the future? Clearly, our governor has dictated that the past should become the present, an erroneous decision if there ever was one and one that is done to gain the favor of the ultra-conservative wing that has overrun the Republican party in a coup d'etat. For all the cries of data-based decision making in education, why not consult the data now? It would tell you that this model policy is not just wrong, but evil and dangerous.\n\nForcing students to be outed to parents who are not supportive places them both in a dangerous situation at school and at home. Unlike our illustrious governor's view that we need to encourage those students to trust their parents, as he told a reporter after the model policy was released, those of us who are queer know that there is an inherent danger in telling even those close to us about our identity. That same danger is amplified for student who are trans or gender non-conforming when they are unable to find safe spaces where they can be themselves without fear of punishment.\n\nAs a higher education educator, I am thankfully not forced to abide by these archaic and dangerous policy changes that will ultimately have disastrous and heartbreaking consequences but my heart breaks for the students who no longer see school as a space where they are valued for who they are, not who society expects them to be because of a letter on their birth certificate. Our trans and gender non-conforming students should be able to be their true selves in our classrooms and hallways so they can flourish and thrive, just like their classmates. I vehemently oppose this so called \"model policy\" and encourage its immediate rescission for the safety of our students."}">Students feeling safe at school has time and time again been a factor in academic and social success. When we create school environments that are actively discriminatory and harmful to students who are already vulnerable due to social stigma and ostracizing from peers, we are fundamentally creating inequitable and unsafe spaces that will detrimentally affect the emotional well-being of trans and gender non-conforming students. It does not harm anyone to use a student's pronouns or call them by their name but it does harm our students when they are forced to hear names over and over that spark dysphoria and emotional distress simply to appease a loud and intolerant minority and gain political clout. Using a student's pronouns and name does not cause psychological trauma, even if your religious beliefs tell you it is wrong, but there are numerous studies about the trauma inflicted by being referred to by deadnames and misgendered. Do we prioritize the values of a time long past that was inherently discriminatory or do we embrace the diverse possibilities of the future? Clearly, our governor has dictated that the past should become the present, an erroneous decision if there ever was one and one that is done to gain the favor of the ultra-conservative wing that has overrun the Republican party in a coup d'etat. For all the cries of data-based decision making in education, why not consult the data now? It would tell you that this model policy is not just wrong, but evil and dangerous.

Forcing students to be outed to parents who are not supportive places them both in a dangerous situation at school and at home. Unlike our illustrious governor's view that we need to encourage those students to trust their parents, as he told a reporter after the model policy was released, those of us who are queer know that there is an inherent danger in telling even those close to us about our identity. That same danger is amplified for student who are trans or gender non-conforming when they are unable to find safe spaces where they can be themselves without fear of punishment.

As a higher education educator, I am thankfully not forced to abide by these archaic and dangerous policy changes that will ultimately have disastrous and heartbreaking consequences but my heart breaks for the students who no longer see school as a space where they are valued for who they are, not who society expects them to be because of a letter on their birth certificate. Our trans and gender non-conforming students should be able to be their true selves in our classrooms and hallways so they can flourish and thrive, just like their classmates. I vehemently oppose this so called "model policy" and encourage its immediate rescission for the safety of our students.


I strongly oppose the proposed guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent with two children in Virginia's public schools, I strongly oppose the proposed guidance. Every child deserves to feel safe and welcome at school - but the draft policy would deny that right to trans and nonbinary kids, encouraging rather than combating the stigma, exclusion, and mental health challenges they too often face.

A 2021 peer-reviewed study by The Trevor Project’s researchers found that transgender and nonbinary youth who reported gender identity acceptance from teachers and peers had significantly lower odds of attempting suicide in the past year. In fact, having at least one accepting adult can reduce the risk of a suicide attempt among LGBTQ young people by 40 percent. But the VA DOE's proposed policy would prevent teachers from creating a safe space for trans and nonbinary students at school; a child could even be "outed" to their parents by teachers without the student's consent, in addition to facing frequent misgendering and the inability to access bathrooms and other spaces matching their gender identity.

This proposed guidance is cruel and discriminatory. The preferences of some parents should not be permitted to dictate a policy that harms children. I urge the DOE to abandon this proposal and work to promote school environments that are inclusive, respectful, and conducive to learning for every student.

Thank you for your consideration.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a friend of a transgender young adult, I strongly oppose the Governor’s student policy, which targets a vulnerable population of students and would cause significant harm to transgender students.


Oppose


Strongly Oppose - Why no letter for students who are non-trans?

<!DOCTYPE html>

What right does a parent have to decide who for their child who they are as a person? Do we need parents to write letters to schools acknowledging whether their child can identify as Christian, atheist, or power bottom servant to the ultimate Lord Furry? Of course NOT; and those are all aspects of a person's life that are purely choices. Why don't non-transgender students have to get written letters from their parents to identify as such?

A transgender or non-binary child does not choose this part of who they are. IT IS WHO THEY ARE... PERIOD. No parent has any enumerated right to deny their child this fundamental right to be who they are. The same party that claims a cluster of cells attached to a uterine wall has all the same "God given" rights as a grown adult would now have us believe those "God given" rights are actually on a "pick-and-choose" basis as dictated by a parent.

In the end, Virginia is for Lovers, and this policy is a direct threat to what this state stands for.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose this policy change


Support the proposed policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support the proposed policies. Children do not belong to the school or the state and they do not have the judgment to make these decisions. </p>


All children and people deserve respect

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I have gay, lesbian, trans, queer and non binary adult friends who finally feel safe enough in this world , at least some of the time, to be themselves. Children have faced incredible stress through the pandemic especially. School should be a safe and welcoming place for all people, and students should never attend in fear, especially over something related to gender identity. I strongly OPPOSE the guidance put forth by youngkin.  Please let kids be kids and let school be a haven for all kids. Trans affirming care and guidance is a human right"}'>I have gay, lesbian, trans, queer and non binary adult friends who finally feel safe enough in this world , at least some of the time, to be themselves. Children have faced incredible stress through the pandemic especially. School should be a safe and welcoming place for all people, and students should never attend in fear, especially over something related to gender identity. I strongly OPPOSE the guidance put forth by youngkin. Please let kids be kids and let school be a haven for all kids. Trans affirming care and guidance is a human right


Transgender rights in the education system

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Governor Youngkin has launched a direct attack on LGBT+ youth with the goal of making their lives a living nightmare. Making it a requirement for educational staff to out transgender students to their families is a clear violation of privacy and could very quickly lead to harm towards the student if they are living with an intolerant family. Along with this it would require staff to refer to students by incorrect names and pronouns which will only lead to higher rates of depression and suicide in Transgender students. All of this to create a hostile environment to students just trying to learn like everyone else. As a Transgender graduate, my time in public school was hard enough just trying to get by, but the support of my teachers using my preferred name and pronouns significantly improved my attitude towards school. I see no reason why we should allow this man, who knows nothing of the troubles against Transgender youth, to implement such outrageous and clearly discriminatory policies."}'>Governor Youngkin has launched a direct attack on LGBT+ youth with the goal of making their lives a living nightmare. Making it a requirement for educational staff to out transgender students to their families is a clear violation of privacy and could very quickly lead to harm towards the student if they are living with an intolerant family. Along with this it would require staff to refer to students by incorrect names and pronouns which will only lead to higher rates of depression and suicide in Transgender students. All of this to create a hostile environment to students just trying to learn like everyone else. As a Transgender graduate, my time in public school was hard enough just trying to get by, but the support of my teachers using my preferred name and pronouns significantly improved my attitude towards school. I see no reason why we should allow this man, who knows nothing of the troubles against Transgender youth, to implement such outrageous and clearly discriminatory policies.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I write this comment in opposition to the proposed guidance document as a member of the healthcare community. My views are my own and not associated with any group or organization. I echo the concerns and suggestions as submitted by Dr. Powell (VA-AAP) in her public comment, and would further add that the proposed document does little to improve on the existing policy all while purporting to be interested in preventing the bullying of "all" students. The implication of this document is that somehow the majority (non-trans students) are being discriminated against or bullied into being nice to their fellow students. I would also point out that while the previous document clearly acknowledged the contributing parties, and had a comprehensive list of definitions, the proposed document does not take into account any reputable stakeholders and offers a paltry list of terms that still manages to get "sex" wrong - what is the sex of a child born with XXY chromosomes? What is the sex of a child born with both traditionally described male and female anatomy? Where does an intersex child use the restroom? You do not have the expertise nor the clinical, biological, or reproductive understanding to make any kind of claim on this matter, and while I appreciate that there is an open comment period, I know you will ignore this and all other input from physicians and scientists who oppose because it does not suit your narrative. Please do take "anonymous" and "angry mom" more seriously than the people who deal the consequences of ill-informed decisions in the real world.

Not for nothing, but editing matters in the real world as well:

"(“?T?his Court has held that the parents’ right to autonomy in child rearing is a fundamental right protected by the Fourteenth Amendment of the United State Constitution and that state interference with that right must be justified by a compelling state interest’” (quoting Williams v. Williams, 24 Va. App. 778, 780 (1997)." - lacks multiple layers of closing parentheses, needs to utilize brackets to indicate parenthetical phrasing within open parenthesis.

"(public school teachers may not give assignments for the purpose of compelling students to assert specific ideological beliefs." - lacks a closing parenthesis.

This document is not ready for prime time and is being prepared by individuals who are pushing a conservative agenda. Strongly oppose.


Strongly Support - Thank you Governer Youngkin!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>No one is "born in the wrong body", especially not children. We, as a society, need to stop playing pretend and enabling people who are severely mentally ill. If you believe the lies of the gender ideology cult, you are the equivalent of a flat earther. Wake up. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the guidance. It’s just intentionally cruel and hurtful.


Oppose

Dear VDOE Representative,My child - a teen - is trans. Being the parent of a trans child is not something that I was in any way prepared for; i.e., there was a steep learning curve. It has been a journey that has challenged my understanding, my assumptions, and my beliefs. It has been a journey of discovery, both of who my child is and who I am, as a parent, as a Christian, and as a fellow human being. Below are some of the lessons that I've learned:- Each person's journey to identifying as transgender - including the age, the timing, the circumstances, the emotional response, etc. - is different. Any policy that applies a uniform approach, treating this community of people and their experiences as monolithic, will be harmful. - Many young people reside in households in which they would be at risk of harm were they to openly identify themselves as transgender. The harm can range from constant disapproval and/or pressure to conform with traditional gender norms (which is highly detrimental psychologically and emotionally) to outright abuse to being kicked out of homes (homelessness). Any policy that prioritizes a parent's right to know over a child's well-being is a harmful policy. The proposed policy, as written, absolutely will be damaging - up to and including life threatening, because of the increased suicide risk - to young people.- Even in the most supportive environments, transgender young people are on the margins. They constantly must work around and within societal norms that weren't made for them. Consequently, even in the best-case scenario, the experience can be stressful. And given that they never know when they might be faced with someone who is prejudiced and potentially violent, it can be frightening. And this is with policies that are wholly supportive of them. Add into the mix policies that out them to their families, regardless of the harm that might be caused; that enable teachers to impose the wrong gender identity, again regardless of the harm that this causes; and that throw even more obstacles into their already challenging path, and this becomes a perfect storm of hurt and harm.- Teens are very much capable of understanding who they are. The activities, responsibilities, and roles that they undertake are impressive, as demonstrated on so many college applications. My older child was in Boy Scouts and, all through his teen years, he was in leadership roles, planned activities, mentored younger Scouts, and planned and completed an Eagle project. No one questioned or doubted his ability to do these things as a teen. Likewise, my younger teen is equally able to think analytically, understand complex ideas, and make sound decisions. This includes identifying as transgender. Any policy that fails to recognize and respect the capabilities of teens is infantilizing and harmful while also being inconsistent with other school-related policies and activities that are aligned with their age and stage of development (i.e., rapidly moving toward adulthood).- Parents who can be trusted with their child's gender identity will hear of it, at some point, from their child. If parents have not been told by their child then (a) the child is not yet ready to have that conversation, and they should be given the space to decide when they're ready, or (b) the parents can't be trusted with this information. There is no good reason for schools to provide this information to parents, and there are many good reasons why schools should NOT provide this information to parents. To insist that parents be notified is to willingly, intentionally, and knowingly cause harm to students.For these reasons and more, I am WHOLLY AGAINST the proposed policies.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Dear VDOE Representative,\n\nMy child - a teen - is trans. Being the parent of a trans child is not something that I was in any way prepared for; i.e., there was a steep learning curve. It has been a journey that has challenged my understanding, my assumptions, and my beliefs. It has been a journey of discovery, both of who my child is and who I am, as a parent, as a Christian, and as a fellow human being. Below are some of the lessons that I've learned:\n- Each person's journey to identifying as transgender - including the age, the timing, the circumstances, the emotional response, etc. - is different. Any policy that applies a uniform approach, treating this community of people and their experiences as monolithic, will be harmful. \n- Many young people reside in households in which they would be at risk of harm were they to openly identify themselves as transgender. The harm can range from constant disapproval and/or pressure to conform with traditional gender norms (which is highly detrimental psychologically and emotionally) to outright abuse to being kicked out of homes (homelessness). Any policy that prioritizes a parent's right to know over a child's well-being is a harmful policy. The proposed policy, as written, absolutely will be damaging - up to and including life threatening, because of the increased suicide risk - to young people.\n- Even in the most supportive environments, transgender young people are on the margins. They constantly must work around and within societal norms that weren't made for them. Consequently, even in the best-case scenario, the experience can be stressful. And given that they never know when they might be faced with someone who is prejudiced and potentially violent, it can be frightening. And this is with policies that are wholly supportive of them. Add into the mix policies that out them to their families, regardless of the harm that might be caused; that enable teachers to impose the wrong gender identity, again regardless of the harm that this causes; and that throw even more obstacles into their already challenging path, and this becomes a perfect storm of hurt and harm.\n- Teens are very much capable of understanding who they are. The activities, responsibilities, and roles that they undertake are impressive, as demonstrated on so many college applications. My older child was in Boy Scouts and, all through his teen years, he was in leadership roles, planned activities, mentored younger Scouts, and planned and completed an Eagle project. No one questioned or doubted his ability to do these things as a teen. Likewise, my younger teen is equally able to think analytically, understand complex ideas, and make sound decisions. This includes identifying as transgender. Any policy that fails to recognize and respect the capabilities of teens is infantilizing and harmful while also being inconsistent with other school-related policies and activities that are aligned with their age and stage of development (i.e., rapidly moving toward adulthood).\n- Parents who can be trusted with their child's gender identity will hear of it, at some point, from their child. If parents have not been told by their child then (a) the child is not yet ready to have that conversation, and they should be given the space to decide when they're ready, or (b) the parents can't be trusted with this information. There is no good reason for schools to provide this information to parents, and there are many good reasons why schools should NOT provide this information to parents. To insist that parents be notified is to willingly, intentionally, and knowingly cause harm to students.\n\nFor these reasons and more, I am WHOLLY AGAINST the proposed policies."}">Dear VDOE Representative,

My child - a teen - is trans. Being the parent of a trans child is not something that I was in any way prepared for; i.e., there was a steep learning curve. It has been a journey that has challenged my understanding, my assumptions, and my beliefs. It has been a journey of discovery, both of who my child is and who I am, as a parent, as a Christian, and as a fellow human being. Below are some of the lessons that I've learned:
- Each person's journey to identifying as transgender - including the age, the timing, the circumstances, the emotional response, etc. - is different. Any policy that applies a uniform approach, treating this community of people and their experiences as monolithic, will be harmful.
- Many young people reside in households in which they would be at risk of harm were they to openly identify themselves as transgender. The harm can range from constant disapproval and/or pressure to conform with traditional gender norms (which is highly detrimental psychologically and emotionally) to outright abuse to being kicked out of homes (homelessness). Any policy that prioritizes a parent's right to know over a child's well-being is a harmful policy. The proposed policy, as written, absolutely will be damaging - up to and including life threatening, because of the increased suicide risk - to young people.
- Even in the most supportive environments, transgender young people are on the margins. They constantly must work around and within societal norms that weren't made for them. Consequently, even in the best-case scenario, the experience can be stressful. And given that they never know when they might be faced with someone who is prejudiced and potentially violent, it can be frightening. And this is with policies that are wholly supportive of them. Add into the mix policies that out them to their families, regardless of the harm that might be caused; that enable teachers to impose the wrong gender identity, again regardless of the harm that this causes; and that throw even more obstacles into their already challenging path, and this becomes a perfect storm of hurt and harm.
- Teens are very much capable of understanding who they are. The activities, responsibilities, and roles that they undertake are impressive, as demonstrated on so many college applications. My older child was in Boy Scouts and, all through his teen years, he was in leadership roles, planned activities, mentored younger Scouts, and planned and completed an Eagle project. No one questioned or doubted his ability to do these things as a teen. Likewise, my younger teen is equally able to think analytically, understand complex ideas, and make sound decisions. This includes identifying as transgender. Any policy that fails to recognize and respect the capabilities of teens is infantilizing and harmful while also being inconsistent with other school-related policies and activities that are aligned with their age and stage of development (i.e., rapidly moving toward adulthood).
- Parents who can be trusted with their child's gender identity will hear of it, at some point, from their child. If parents have not been told by their child then (a) the child is not yet ready to have that conversation, and they should be given the space to decide when they're ready, or (b) the parents can't be trusted with this information. There is no good reason for schools to provide this information to parents, and there are many good reasons why schools should NOT provide this information to parents. To insist that parents be notified is to willingly, intentionally, and knowingly cause harm to students.

For these reasons and more, I am WHOLLY AGAINST the proposed policies.


STRONGLY SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you so much!  I am grateful to have the rights of parents be supported and upheld by the state and school districts.  My family has been so concerned and uncomfortable with the policy of kids of different sexes being allowed to use the same bathrooms and gym locker rooms.  My children said they would try just to not go to the bathroom all day.  That isn't healthy but they were so afraid of being in there with someone of a different sex that they don't want to use them at all.  This is detrimental to their health and against our values.

I'm also so grateful that the forced use of chosen pronouns is being stopped.  I was appalled that it is written in the Students Rights & Responsibilities booklet for this year that if they used the wrong pronoun, even accidentally, that a student could be suspended!  The school district has gone beyond just supporting all students to teaching them that what gender you are is a matter of choice and opinion.  I don't believe this and don't want it forced on my children.

I am glad there is very strong wording in the policy that no bullying or harassing will be tolerated as school should be a place where all are welcomed and have a good learning environment.  It isn't right for a student who is transgender to be bullied and it's also not right for a child who isn't to be bullied.  I teach my children to love everyone even if we don't agree with what they believe.  I'm hopeful this new policy will allow that to happen for all students.

Thank you,

Kara I. Ludlow