Reasons I am Opposed to this Proposal

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am firmly against this proposal for a variety of reasons.

As a trans student who recently graduated, I am more than aware of the effects that student privacy can have on our day to day lives. From the very moment I came out as transgender,  my immediate family was openly against me. They never even stopped to consider showing support for who I am. They often reacted with hostility, sometimes with physical violence. if I ever tried to embrace my identity. I was forcibly isolated from my friends who supported me in who I was, making me feel alone. I couldn’t seek therapy or go online, lest I find a support system which validated my identity. My family didn’t want anything to do with me if I deviated from what their own personal view of me was. I was utterly alone. They claimed to do it all in the name of my own benefit.

At school, some of the very few people I could trust and rely on was my teachers. Through my teachers, I always had somebody I could confide in if I felt that my safety at home was in jeopardy, which it often was. They gave me access to resources for transgender students I’d never have learned of without them. In school, I felt safe to be who I was, without fear of being punished for it. The school administration gave me the emotional and social support I needed in life and I’m eternally thankful to them for it. They stepped up where my family failed. Many people claim “family knows best” or “all families love their children unconditionally” but this is not true. Many people who were never fit to be parents will benefit from this policy change, and many youth who already aren’t safe at home won’t be safe at school either.

At what point are students permitted the privacy to be who they are, without fear of the world tearing them down in the name of “societal normality”? We must realise that is it 2022, and times have changed. We cannot live life following the same “rules” which we followed 60 years ago.


2022 Revised Changes to the Transgender Policies in Education

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support these changes.

Thank you for updating these policies to restore protections for basic parental rights and ensuring that parents are no longer cut out of the process—especially when it concerns how gender and sexuality issues are handled with our kids at school.

As a newly retired teacher, I was instructed that I had to adhere to the student's request for a name change and wanting to be known as a boy instead of a girl, when I knew the parent did not know.  This was wrong in many areas.  If I had to do this again, I would respond differently even at the expense of my job.  Secrets are never a good way to handle issues.  Why not support the child and family.

As a former Health and PE teacher, I do not think the answer is to allow transgender students a free pass to opposite gender restrooms and changing in the opposite gender locker rooms.  Where is the social, emotional/mental protection of the the remaining 98% of the students.  I feel all students need to be protected.  When a student is calling themselves transgender and willing to stand separate from their birth gender and not be ashamed, I believe they should be respected and protected from all bullying and social abuse.  Utilizing a separately identified transgender male/female facility for changing and using the restroom is not social abuse.  I believe it validates their decision while still respecting their decision and the decision of the remaining students.


Thank you!

<!DOCTYPE html>

After reading this policy change as well as many comments from those opposed to it, I would like to take a moment to encourage Governor Younkin.   The arguments presented by those who oppose the revocation of the 2021 policy were unfortunately often political and emotional rather than thoughtful.  Of those who were thoughtful, some did not accurately reflect the decades of psychological research that undermine the current official stance of the AMA, APA, ACA, ect.   In reading an argument from authority, it is important to bear in mind that professional organizations were designed to create political clout; this is particularly so in today's climate.  Because of this, their stances are often as rooted in politics as they are in professional concerns.  While no parent is perfect, neither is any teacher or administrator in the schools and they have less personal investment in the children.  Simply put, public schools should not be a place for political activism or social experimentation.  All children should be protected from abuse, including the abusive actions of some public school faculty, staff, or administration who see themselves as having more rights than the parents.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy, one of the most well-researched and supported therapeutic interventions available, is built on the premise that an individual's beliefs/thoughts shape their emotions/behavior.  If children are told by authority figures that they are what they think they are, they will believe it and act upon it.  Having said this, it is important to acknowledge that some people genuinely struggle with gender dysphoria and deserve authentic care and compassion; however, in large part the current unrest has been generated by people who do not allow children to work through the traditional angst of childhood.

This is a difficult subject so let's choose to be kind to one another, recognizing that while there is much disagreement on this topic, it is important to not wish ill will or ascribe evil intent on those with opposing views.  Remember, disagreement is not hate; with this in mind, I applaud the Governor's effort to protect all children in Virginia's public schools.


Children will die because of this

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Young children will be at heightened risk of depression, self-harm, and suicide if this is enforced. This backs young people into a corner, where they are increasingly vulnerable to parental/familial abuse, being socially and institutionally ostracized, and left to navigate the process of growing alone or with only the guidance of peers who may be similarly suffering. This is a disaster in the making. Alternatively, we could support our children in their growth and self-exploration so they can feel loved and supported while they become who they are and want to be. </p>


Protection Against Discrimination

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Thank you for the opportunity to weigh in on the proposed changes. I am advocating for the safety of our transgender and nonbinary students who deserve to be in a school environment free from discrimination based on their gender identity, sexual orientation, expression, and sex characteristics. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools is as narrow and biased as the definition attached to "transgender student" provided within. Please consider collaborating with pediatricians who work with this patient population to prevent discrimination against transgender and nonbinary students in this document. All our students deserve dignity and respect, not just some.  </p>


Protect Emotionally Vulnerable Children and Parental Rights!

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Constance Ikeda
13501 Water Birch Ct
Fairfax, VA 22033

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Constance Ikeda
<br />13501 Water Birch Ct<br />Fairfax, VA 22033<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148225532" width="1" height="1" />


Strongly opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

There is scientific and pediatric physician based evidence to show this is a horrendous policy move that WILL put children in danger and increase the rate of teen suicide. Do not allow this policy to pass! Listen to our children! Listen to thw MAJORITY of parents, because we do oppose this! Do no give our children death sentences when you should be allowing them the freedom to grow and learn, you know, an education, which is what they are there for.


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Rob Presler
9789 Viewcrest Dr
Fairfax Station, VA 22039

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Rob Presler
<br />9789 Viewcrest Dr<br />Fairfax Station, VA 22039<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148225513" width="1" height="1" />


I stand with Governor Youngkin!  Please wake up and protect our children.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I stand with Governor Youngkin, and I hope you will too.  This is for the safety of our children.  The school is not for teaching a child about their gender, teach math, reading, and even gardening and balancing a checkbook.  But stop putting confusion in their minds about what bathrooms to use.  Sincerely, Renee Bostic


This is Ridiculous

<!DOCTYPE html>

Other people's gender identity is none of your ing business. Let kids use the bathroom they feel most comfortable in and keep your prejudice to yourself.


Strongly Oppose. You're going to have blood on your hands.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Every child has a right to privacy.

I'm gonna be straight here. What's going to happen if this is approved? Trans children will be forcibly outed to their parents. No matter how you feel about transgender people, keep in mind that by approving this, you're sentencing children to possibly being abused or killed, or harassed to suicide by their parents. Can you sleep at night knowing this? Can you sleep at night knowing you just sentenced a child to be beaten or murdered?

Data shows that 40% of transgender people attempt suicide, and the cause is usually a lack of support from their loved ones. So if your concern is trans kids' mental health, the best thing you can do is NOT tell their parents (they can do that in their own time and in their own way, as they know their parents best) and let them explore their identity in a safe place.

Isn't that what school is supposed to be? The first place we wander away from our parents in, and the first place we start to become ourselves in? The first place where Billy discovers his loves for trigonometry, and where Sally discovers her love for writing.

Is it not the first place we learn who we are in relation to others, as well? Who we like, who we dislike, who we're attracted to, what place we have in society?

Lastly, I guarantee that if school were to become an unsafe space for transgender kids, they would still find other avenues to explore their gender identity, you just won't know about it. They always have, we always have. Is that how you're looking to protect them?

If it can't be a child's safe place to discover themselves outside of their parent's well-meaning, but maybe overbearing, safety, then what is school?


Strongly support new guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you governor for creating common sense policy. Girls in our schools should not be suffering any longer.


If kids are suicidal get them mental health care; not a free pas to the little girl's bathroom.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stop this narrative that we have to let kids live in a society w/o rules or they will kill themselves. Go back to parenting 101. Society has rules. It's life. Set appropriate expectations for kids. No you can't go in the locker room with the girls that are showering because that's how you feel today. You cant play on the girl's sports teams. Change your name if you would like but don't expect me to play fantasy games with you.


STRONGLY IN SUPPORT OF THE NEW GUIDANCE!!!! PLEASE APPROVE ASAP

<!DOCTYPE html>

Praying everyday that this new policy comes to place ASAP!!! As an APS parent I was shocked when I learned that a Wakefield high school counselor forged parents signatures to consent  transgender students to receive 'support' Please read the below snipet from the Daily Wire:

"In a July 2022 episode of the same podcast, she described evading requirements for parental permission. “I recognize that parental consent is a big deal, but when I’m doing anything LGBT, I don’t worry about that. … Let’s be honest, it’s an electronic permission slip. You type in a parent’s name and I’m like ‘oh that parent signed consent.’ There’s no actual signature.”

“I do love my neuro- and gender-diverse kids, those are like my favorite,” she said."- Amy Cannava - Wakefield High School Counselor

Parents need to be fully informed of their minor student's business. Parents should also be educated about LGBTQ, trans issues, etc... But please, keep parents informed and encourage those minor children to also reach out to their parents.


Thank you Governor for Restoring Parental Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you, Governor Youngkin, for your bold action to restore parental rights!


Strongly Oppose - Breach of Privacy

<!DOCTYPE html>

At the end of the day this is nothing but a breach of privacy into the medical records of students. The obsession to know a child's genitals is, quite frankly, disgusting, and an overreach of power. Please focus on improving the lives of students through education and community support, as school is supposed to, rather than antagonizing minors for topics outside of your jurisdiction.


This policy will kill children

<!DOCTYPE html>

Studies show that not allowing children to live as their gender identity greatly increases their risks of suicide. Forcing teachers to inform parents will also result in children facing abuse at home from unsupportive families.

Furthermore, these "bathroom bills" are unnecessary - trans people attacking others in bathrooms is a made-up problem. It does not happen. Trans people are far more likely to BE attacked.

This is a ridiculous, unnecessary policy meant to scare people into thinking that transgender children are dangerous monsters.


This change could mean death for students

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>If this change is made to the law students whose families are abusive could face consequences to the point of death. Imagine if you will a student who cannot trust their Pentel figures. Who would throw them on the street or physically harm them if they heard that the student do not like to go by their given name or do not feel well with their pronouns/ gender expression. This policy could severely harm them in a situation where most children have no rights of their own or where they are entirely dependent on said abusive family members. </p>


This is harmful beyond repair

<!DOCTYPE html>

Hello all reading,

This legislation will lead to the deaths of many children. Both transgender and cis. By forcing students to go into assigned gender at birth washrooms you are increasing the likelihood of physical and sexual violence against trans girls. When trans girls stop coming out and living as their true identities it will leave them with a profound discomfort that will affect the entire school community. You are actively working to destroy any trust your students will have in the education system and in the adults in their lives. From what sources are you choosing to base this change on? do you have any evidence that trans girls enact gendered violence against their female classmates? There is a plethora of documented circumstances where forcing trans female students to use male washrooms result in bullying, harassment, suicide, and murder.

Examine where your mindset comes from - be it science, empirical data, religious beliefs, personal beliefs - and reflect. Does this mindset reflect the evidence provided from credible sources?


Parents are their student's support group

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I strongly support the new policy which includes parents in the development of their children in public schools.  First, children are the parents' responsibility in school, out of school, and after graduation.  If the public schools are so supportive of children "transitioning to another gender," then where is their support two years after graduation?  Five years after?  Non-existent!  The family is the best support system there is, so the parents need to be involved.  Second, I haven't seen any studies in human development that say it's a positive thing to develop two identities.  In fact, it's detrimental to mental health to do that, so the public schools should not encourage students to be one person at school and another person at home. </p>


Support the 2022 Proposed Change

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>It is time to return the focus on the fundamentals- what our kids need to succeed in life is to be able to know and apply the basics of reading, writing and math.  As parents we need to be involved, no one has more interest in our children or their future than we do.  </p>


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Hamelmal Yohannes
7639 Summerhill Ct
Lorton, VA 22079

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Hamelmal Yohannes
<br />7639 Summerhill Ct<br />Lorton, VA 22079<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148224689" width="1" height="1" />


Help Virginia students

<!DOCTYPE html>

I feel for the kids who have to go through this, and hope that changes will be made for their safety.


You’ve missed the point: we send our kids to school for an education not for coming out parties.

<!DOCTYPE html>

School is for math and science. We don’t send kids to school so that you can recruit new members into your club. Support parental rights!


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Kevin Ikeda
13501 Water Birch Ct
Fairfax, VA 22033

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Kevin Ikeda
<br />13501 Water Birch Ct<br />Fairfax, VA 22033<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148224269" width="1" height="1" />


If you pass this, you will get children killed.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Do you want the blood of children on your hands? Because you will kill trans children if you pass this. They will die by suicide, by parental abuse and neglect, by teacher abuse and neglect, by peer abuse. Studies and history have shown time and time again that these kinds of discriminatory policies kill. Is that what you want? To kill children?


I oppose Youngkin's policy change

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the policy change regarding trans/nonbinary youth. I keep seeing that the changes are to "protect and reinforce" parental rights, to prevent indoctrination of students by schools. I fail to see how a student requesting a teacher or school system address them by a different mane or pronoun is the system attempting to "indoctrinate". If you truly mean that you believe all children should be treated with respect, then addressing them as they see themselves is step one. Additionally, some trans/nonbinary and even gay students my not feel safe coming out at home. The policy requirement to "out" a student to a parent could put an already vulnerable student at risk. For theses reason I oppose the policy changes put forth by Gov. Youngkin.


You’ve missed the whole point

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>“Coming out” is an extremely personal moment for someone. If someone comes out to you, they are letting you know that they feel safe enough with you to handle their true self without discrimination or fear. It is not up to the schools to “out” anyone. This is a personal decision that schools have no right in interfering with. Parents need to take a hard look at themselves and ask “does my child feel safe with me enough to tell me life changing news?”  Because if you find that your child did not come out to you, maybe you should ask yourself “why?” “What in our relationship does not make my child feel safe with me?”  As a former teacher, I ran into a situation where my student felt safe to come out to me and then also informed me that if their mom knew, she would be severely punished and probably taken away from school and friends. This is not an unusual case. So now teachers have to choose between their jobs and the safety of their student? Make this make sense: </p>


In support of 2022 policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I fully support withdrawing the 2021 policy.  </p>


Restore Parents' Rights in Education!

Dear Virginia Department of Education Officials,

Policies for transgender students implemented in states and school districts across the United States have sought to exclude parents from vital conversations about their child's education and wellbeing.

Former Governor Ralph Northam's administration chipped away at the rights of Virginia parents with its 2021 model policies for transgender students. Those policies explicitly stated that school officials were not always required to tell parents about their child's decision to use a new name and pronouns at school.

I'm writing in support of the Youngkin administration's new model policies, "On the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents In Virginia's Public Schools," which enshrine the rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their child while respecting all students across the Commonwealth.

Thank you for your commitment to parents' rights in education. I urge you to implement the policies as written and restore the right and responsibility of parents to make the best decisions for their child.

Regards,
Jennifer Morse
5641 Spring Ln
Lake Charles, LA 70605

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Department of Education Officials,<br /><br />Policies for transgender students implemented in states and school districts across the United States have sought to exclude parents from vital conversations about their child's education and wellbeing. <br /><br />Former Governor Ralph Northam's administration chipped away at the rights of Virginia parents with its 2021 model policies for transgender students. Those policies explicitly stated that school officials were not always required to tell parents about their child's decision to use a new name and pronouns at school. <br /><br />I'm writing in support of the Youngkin administration's new model policies, "On the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents In Virginia's Public Schools," which enshrine the rights of parents to direct the upbringing of their child while respecting all students across the Commonwealth. <br /><br />Thank you for your commitment to parents' rights in education. I urge you to implement the policies as written and restore the right and responsibility of parents to make the best decisions for their child.<br /><br />Regards,
<br />Jennifer Morse
<br />5641 Spring Ln<br />Lake Charles, LA 70605<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657466/148223814" width="1" height="1" />


2022 Model policies for students and parents in Virginia’s Public Schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Gov Youngkin's proposed policy to ensure parents are involved and informed about potential actions by the school or within school grounds.  I agree with II.A.2 "Schools shall defer to parents to make the best decisions with respect to their children."  While students are living with parents (yes, there are exceptions), I agree with the policy's statement: "parents to exercise their fundamental rights granted by the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution to direct the care, upbringing and education of their children." (emphasis added)  I agree with withdrawing the 2021 Model Policies.

I also believe the parents know their children more fully than any other individual or institution including background, preferences, tendencies, struggles, and intellect.  Parent also love their children more than any teacher, principal, coach, or institution.  We must respect that experience and perspective when "life" decisions are made and this proposed policy requires that parental involvement.


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Michael ODonnell
12607 Lake Normandy Ln
Fairfax, VA 22030

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Michael ODonnell
<br />12607 Lake Normandy Ln<br />Fairfax, VA 22030<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148223362" width="1" height="1" />


Concerns Regarding Proposed Model Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

To the VDOE: As a resident of the State of VA, I am writing these comments in response to the 2022 Model Policies on The Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools (policy). The policy cherry picks references and definitions that align with its purported viewpoint on parental rights and religious beliefs. The policy is vague and one-dimensional. The premise of the policy is based on religious and parental beliefs, but it is obvious that these beliefs are narrow, and not representative of the diverse population of the State.

As a taxpayer, I am also very concerned on the amount of resources the State has spent on drafting this policy and subsequently responding to public comments and altering the policy. Surely the VDOE has more pressing issues that affect all students vice singling out a minority of students. For example, the State could be directing resources to reducing classroom student-to-teacher ratios.

Overall, the proposed policy is vague and lacks nuance. The state has cherrypicked definitions and legal examples and has used the terms "parent rights" and "religious beliefs" as accepted terminology. It is clear that the State has selected a narrow viewpoint on both of these topics to justify their position.

Below are specific comments to the policy:

11.D: One of the guiding principles of this policy is to protect students against discrimination based on their sex - the sex they are assigned NOT the sex the identify with. That is a very important distinction that this policy tries to obfuscate. This entire policy discriminates against students who do not align with their assigned sex.

IV: Terminology: Need a definition on gender. Sex and gender are distinct and different. Sex is biological while gender is the societal construct assigned to a sex. It is obvious this policy is only interested in presenting a narrow view that does not include all the relevant terminology on this topic.

IV. Terminology: How does the State define 'religious belief' or 'parental right'?

V.C: The policy claims to align with the First Amendment, yet this policy very obviously aligns with a very narrow ideological belief. How is that constitutional and upheld? Did the State consider the viewpoints of all religious beliefs in the State when drafting this policy or only those that aligned with a subset of Mr. Youngkin's voter base?

VI.A.1: First amendment rights protect against being forced to believe an ideological perspective, however, this entire policy reads as a protection of religious beliefs but it is obvious they are very specific religious beliefs.  As written, this policy protects the vague notion of religious beliefs - but it does not define what those religious beliefs are. Did the State consider religious beliefs that did not align with the political agenda of this policy?

-VI.6: I am a parent with a child in FCPS. Every time there is a proposed lesson, survey, or exam I receive a form from the school on FCPS (at a minimum) letterhead where I am asked to opt in/opt out of such lessons. Can the State provide evidence that these notifications are not being done? Can the State provide data on the opt-out rates?

-VI.20: The example provided, while it supports the State’s position, is lacking. The State must also show lawsuits and legal precedence protecting the rights of individuals to be called by their so-called name of choice. The State cannot reference only legal positions that align with the State’s political leanings.

General:

-IV: the related laws only mention religious beliefs and sex discrimination. The State cannot propose a policy on transgender students without even mentioning the word gender.

-Can the State provide evidence regarding the types of religious discrimination that calling someone by their chosen name causes?

-While the proposed policy again, aims to protect religious beliefs, what specific religious belief prohibits someone from using someone else’s chosen name? Please provide a reference to the specific scripture.

- How does the State define what constitutes a male versus a female name? Or a male versus a female nickname? What is the state’s position on gender-neutral names or nicknames (e.g., Alex)? What constitutes a name versus a nickname? The State cannot be recommending they start policing what names are acceptable or not.

-What rights do students have? Often, schools are the safest place for students – the only place for them to have a meal, or a comfortable roof over their head, and/or emotional support. By leaning so heavily on protecting parent rights, this policy protects the rights of parents who are not supportive of their children. Children, while they may be minors, have autonomy and rights. Transgender youths have extremely high suicidal and homelessness rates. The State’s proposed policy would support those statistics as it would force children in unsupportive families to remain “closeted”. This policy forces “outings” in the name of parental rights.

-How much money did the State spend on writing this policy in light of the minority percentage of students who are transgender? As a tax paying resident of the State, surely there are more pressing issues than drafting vague policies that align with a very narrow political belief cloaked in the disguise of parental rights or religious belief.

Thank you for the opportunity to comment. I hope that the State takes seriously the comments received and does not capitulate to politics on this issue.


Stop the discrimination of girls at school- Support this policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stop discriminating against girls at school. They have rights too. What rights have teams lost? The right to change the English language and to force adults to change it to? The right to enter little girl’s bathrooms?


Strongly approve

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents have the right to raise their children in a society free from the left’s perversion.


I support banning people with penises from entering little girl’s bathrooms.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you governor for helping to restore some normalcy to our society.


Support parental rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

I don’t want the teacher’s unions raising my child with their liberal agendas. I bring my child to school to learn from their teachers not to think like their teachers.


This Democrat supports this policy: protect girl’s rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

Give girls back their sports. Give them back their bathrooms and locker rooms.


strongly OPPOSE this change

Arlington Public Schools teacher & parent

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent of 2 students in Arlington Public Schools, and as an APS teacher, I STRONGLY oppose this policy change. While I would hope that any parent would be a fierce advocate for their child, regardless of what gender they identify as, I believe that outing a child against their will could put LGBTQ students in danger. Trans students in particular suffer disproportionately from depression, anxiety, and suicide. We need to support these children and make sure they can study in a safe and accepting environment. If public schools become places where they need to hide from suspicious teachers for fear of "outing", we are not providing equal access to public education. Overblown and unrealistic fears of boys in girls locker rooms and locker rooms (which is NOT happening, let's be honest) and panic about gender reassignment medical procedures against parents' will are used to stoke panic in parents and score political points. As educators and parents, our job is support and protect children. This policy is WRONG, is against all reputable pediatric medical and psychiatric guidelines, and I strongly OPPOSE it.


Hateful policies!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Strongly oppose! Shouldn’t we be promoting unity and not division? Oh, wait- you’re a Republican. These policies are nothing but discriminatory and are aimed at appeasing your base. “Parental rights” means rights only for the most extreme, noisy, conservative parents. Not all parents.


I oppose this harmful policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

These policies will harm vulnerable students and leave them open to bullying and parental abuse. Allowing students their freedom of expression harms no one, but denying it and telling parents will hurt them.


Sensible and Appropriate Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Several great improvements:

The new policy appropriately recognizes the important role of parents in raising, educating, and guiding children in a complex world.  The guidelines are clear and understandable.  The clarity of ensuring that parents are directly and clearly part of all discussions associated with their child is fundamentally right.

The policy is also a great step forward by focusing on how the school interacts with the student/parent while not using school policy to establish as settled the many issues surrounding transgenderism.

Also clear is policy's statement intolerant of bullying.


I oppose this policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy is an example of what we've come to expect from the Republican party.  Divisive, shortsighted and lacking inclusivity.  It fails to take into consideration a changing landscape in our country and how to approach complex issues.  </p>


Strongly Opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This proposed model policy on transgender students is a terrible mistake. If it takes effect in its current form, our state will be less inclusive and make schools more dangerous for transgender students. The governor claims this policy is about parental rights, but it denies rights to the supportive parents of transgender students. It denies autonomy to trans students and their parents and creates loopholes that allow any school employee to discriminate against students as a matter of personal choice. This is a huge step backward and will lead to increased bullying of trans students and the feeling that they are not welcome in Virginia schools. Transgender students have an alarmingly high rate of depression and suicide attempts and policies like this will only make that problem worse. </p>


Strongly support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Protect parental rights


VDOE Transgender Students

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This strongly support this new policy.Protect children and parental rights. </p>


I support Governor Youngkin’s protection of the parent-child relationship

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support the policy of keeping parents informed about their children’s transgender expression.  It is important for parents to be involved to help their children through the challenges like this.  </p>


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Patricia Johnson
14906 Cranoke St
Centreville, VA 20120

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Patricia Johnson
<br />14906 Cranoke St<br />Centreville, VA 20120<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222666" width="1" height="1" />


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Linda Siegel
6407 Recreation Ln
Falls Church, VA 22041

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Linda Siegel
<br />6407 Recreation Ln<br />Falls Church, VA 22041<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222598" width="1" height="1" />


2022 Model Policies Divisiveness

<!DOCTYPE html>

The Virginia Department of Education 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia Public Schools troubles me.  The title is a misnomer.  The Model Policies do not deem dignity and respect for all students and parents.  They cater to the belief system of one group of people.  These are not my beliefs.

While I agree that parents have the right to direct the care, upbringing, and education of their children (3), I do not agree with parents doing so at the expense of my and my children’s rights.  I want my family members to experience the richness of diversity.  I want my family members to have the opportunity to learn acceptance, respect, and cooperation with people that they will meet in the global community.  I want my family to know how to respectfully refer to others by their requested pronouns.  It is my hope that the public school models and facilitates that opportunity.  Doing such, the public school has the opportunity to help heal the divisiveness that is damaging our society at large.  The 2022 Model Policies as written contribute and enhance the divisiveness.

The Model Policies state: All students have the right to attend school in an environment free from discrimination, harassment, or bullying (1, 10), and …bullying and abusive work environments are prohibited. (10)  Further, the Code of Virginia § 22.1-276.01. Definitions states "Bullying" means any aggressive and unwanted behavior that is intended to harm, intimidate, or humiliate the victim; involves a real or perceived power imbalance between the aggressor or aggressors and victim; and is repeated over time or causes severe emotional trauma. "Bullying" includes cyber bullying. "Bullying" does not include ordinary teasing, horseplay, argument, or peer conflict.  Thus, it becomes clear that an imbalance of power occurs when school staff refuse to acknowledge a student’s requested name and pronouns.  Further, and especially if the student has the support of family, the staff’s refusal can be perceived as intimidating, humiliating, and emotionally harming – i.e., bullying.  The Model Policies support bullying of children who are nonbinary.  That makes the public school an unsafe environment.

The school’s responsibility is to educate.  Perhaps the Model Policies should address how to educate parents, students, staff, and community on how to develop acceptance and cooperation.  Nonbinary kids are not to be feared.  They are just kids who need a safe place where they are respected so they can ask questions.  They are just kids trying to figure things out.

I am NOT in favor of the proposed 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia Public Schools.


Vehemently oppose!

<!DOCTYPE html>

These are dangerous policies that promote hate. What about consulting with the mental health experts who oppose this policy? Oh, wait- Republicans could care less about science. Shameful!


I oppose this dangerous policy.

<!DOCTYPE html>

The fact that Youngkin has not consulted with trans people and the parents of trans kids about this is all I need to know. The far right is imposing their beliefs on the rest of us. This will hurt all kids. Trans kids, all of the LGBTQ+ rainbow, any child who feels marginalized and separate from their family. There is so place for them is what we're saying. What kind of weak adult can't acknowledge a child's expression of who they are? Shame on this administration for trying to take us back to the dark ages. We know better. We should do better. I hope every school opposes this horrible policy.


Strongly oppose!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Republicans are a party of hate and discrimination at this point. How dare you throw children under the bus to score political points with your extreme base. Worst governor ever!


Hateful policies!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Shame on you for discriminating against children to earn political points. I thought you were a good Christian. It seems to me a good Christian would be kind and not promote hate. Hypocrite! Kharma will eventually bite back.


Virginia is for haters with this policy!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Quit pandering to your bigoted base and govern for all of us. Worst governor ever!


So you want no tourists or new residents, then

<!DOCTYPE html>

Any ordinance that so very badly infringes on human rights and bodily agency as this one tells every outsider that your town, your city, your state, is actively horrid and not the least worth investing in. Why would anyone want to come to a place that supports the abuse of minorities, except more abusers?

If this passes, i hope very much you enjoy the world you make for yourself, one full of unsafe children and the predators that use your law to make them unsafe. it will also be a world where you have outed yourself and the district you represent as being worthless to everyone else.


Protect Emotionally Vulnerable Children and Parental Rights!

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Rebecca Jorns
7866 Colonial Village Row
Annandale, VA 22003

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Rebecca Jorns
<br />7866 Colonial Village Row<br />Annandale, VA 22003<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222468" width="1" height="1" />


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The new model policy is detrimental to the health and safety of our children. </p>


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Ryan Fleming
1217 Bond St
Herndon, VA 20170

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Ryan Fleming
<br />1217 Bond St<br />Herndon, VA 20170<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222251" width="1" height="1" />


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Annmarie Swope
11208 Longwood Grove Dr
Reston, VA 20194

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Annmarie Swope
<br />11208 Longwood Grove Dr<br />Reston, VA 20194<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222247" width="1" height="1" />


Transgender Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I strongly support the new 2022 transgender policy.  Parents should be able to raise their children, and that includes helping their children make decisions that will impact their future health and well being.  </p>


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Sherri Lang
7204 Reservation Dr
Springfield, VA 22153

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Sherri Lang
<br />7204 Reservation Dr<br />Springfield, VA 22153<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148222215" width="1" height="1" />


Transgender student policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

The State of Virginia is correct in asserting that parents have the right to determine the course of their children's education.  No one is completely certain about  what proportion of the student body is transgender, and simply because a student seems unhappy, or chooses to act or dress in a manner invoking the opposite sex, does not mean they are transgender.  Parents know their children best, and they should be able to direct their child's education, not the state.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Although I do not understand it it does mot mean I should dictate how our youth shpuld feel. I have recently come to realize that we parents do not always know what is best for our children's mental health. I strongly oppose this. </p>


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Joseph Gatt
105 Jefferson Run Rd
Great Falls, VA 22066

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Joseph Gatt
<br />105 Jefferson Run Rd<br />Great Falls, VA 22066<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148221968" width="1" height="1" />


Dear Virginia Dept of Education,

Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children.

The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.

The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians."

I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.

Sincerely,
Greg Hayken
12956 Oak Lawn Pl
Herndon, VA 20171

<!DOCTYPE html>

Dear Virginia Dept of Education,<br /><br />Schools should never secretly socially transition students and keep the child's new name, pronouns and gender identities from parents. I am pleased and relieved that the Virginia Department of Education's revised model policies support parental rights and ensure that school employees don't cut parents out of critical decisions for their children. <br /><br />The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) issued "model policies" in 2021 that encouraged every school district in Virginia to hide a child's new gender identity from parents who choose to affirm the child's biological sex. Under Governor Youngkin's leadership, the VDOE's revised policies make it clear that all children should be valued and parents' rights and beliefs should be respected. The 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for all Students and Parents in Virginia's Public Schools keep parents involved in major decisions in their children's lives.<br /><br />The 2021 VDOE "model policies" encouraged schools to create "a plan (that) may include addressing the student at school with their name and pronoun consistent with their gender identity while using the legal name and pronoun associated with the sex assigned at birth when communicating with parents or guardians." <br /><br />I strongly support the revised policies that end this practice. Virginia schools should not drive a wedge between parents and their emotionally vulnerable children. Virginia school districts, including those who have already communicated their plans to ignore the 2022 revised model policies, should put an end to secret Gender Support Plans now.<br /><br />Sincerely,
<br />Greg Hayken
<br />12956 Oak Lawn Pl<br />Herndon, VA 20171<br /><img src="http://admin.phone2action.com/email/open/leg/657523/148221914" width="1" height="1" />


Strongly Approve!


Parents are the First Teachers of their children

<!DOCTYPE html>

I wholeheartedly support Governor Younkin's policies regarding parental rights and children's safety rights in our public education system.  The publicly supported education system does not have the right to close parents out of the process of influencing and guiding our children.  The motto of ALL boards of education should be - "Parents are the first teachers of their children".

To carry that one step further, I encourage our Governor to support "school choice" by giving Virginians the right to spend their tax money on any school, public or private, they choose.

Thank you,

William Blatnik


I’m a fairfax mom of 3 daughters

<!DOCTYPE html>

5 days before I received and read the new model policies. I had received a form from the school telling me to sign and acknowledge receipt of the {now previous} policies. I feel grateful I only had to endure 5 days of sickness and seething contempt for the previous policies for which I was assured my signature only meant “receipt” but felt dirty nonetheless for signing it.

I feel bad for all parents who had to endure years of that trauma of acknowledging receipt of such faux do-goodery horrors against their own children by the most contemptible of peoples because the State was holding hostage the right to a public education for their child if they didn’t submit and debase themselves. The anguish felt by those parents who had to sign their name in receipt of such despicable policies must have been unspeakable, given what I know I went through for 5 days from my oldest of 3, who just entered kindergarten.

I have 3 girls, 6 and under. It is absolutely my mission to reward politicians that promote policies like these, and name and shame and malign politicians and the constituent’s that do not. I have 3 young girls, you can call me anything you want because you’re literally pedo-adjacent scum and not fit to give anyone a lecture, but you better keep lying creeping boys and pedo-enablers away from my precious actually female (always and forever, unlike males that fetishize females)  babies. I have many years ahead of me in the system and I’m not about to humor pedophiles and perverts and twits that invent reasons to lure children and stunt puberty (which pedos hate, by definition) and I have no patience for contemptible ninnies that ought to know better if they actually lived up to their own conceits.

Id absolutely make Youngkin the President of the United States if he put these child predating liars In their place cemented in law. Trump was soft of this T- crap, and if republicans want to beat Trump, this is the only legitimate way to do it.


oppose- and people are worried about boys going in girls bathrooms but not girls entering boys rooms

<!DOCTYPE html>

This bill is simply transphobic and there is no reason for it to be passed. Students will choose not to tell their parents about being wanting to be the opposite gender because they fear their parents not giving support. If this bill is passed, trans kids with transphobic parents will most likely commit suicide due to it. Every trans kid should not be prohibited to go to their gender identity bathroom if a couple of bad apples decided to make bad choices.  By that logic, every human should be removed because a couple of them decided to make bad choices. Do not pass this bill.


Strongly opposed to this policy! It will increase parental abuse and KILL CHILDREN.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a lifelong resident of Virginia, and I beg you not to undertake this policy. Fundamentally, this is a question of basic freedom of expression. In the same way that a kid can wear a bright pink shirt, they can ‘wear’ whatever name and clothes they want. Referring to someone by their preferred name (like calling “Nicholas” “Nick” instead) is easy and hurts no one. They are children, and there is no reason the administration should be enforcing harmful policies against them.

And it WILL hurt children. It may even kill then. In particular, mandating that schools tell parents about inappropriate gender behavior will encourage parents to ‘crack down’ on their children, in the same way that telling parents about a student’s poor behavior is expected to result in their being punished at home. Is this something that a child deserves to be punished for? This is not about “parental rights” — no parent has the right to hurt their child. A child is a full person with rights and freedoms, who will soon be an adult and may someday themselves be a parent. If the child is not telling their parent about this, there is a GOOD REASON. Familial violence against children over gender behavior is WELL DOCUMENTED. Is a child who wore a skirt, better off for being smacked in the face? Can you believe that that would “correct” their behavior and make them a “normal” and healthy person? It doesn’t work that way.

Think of the children — and protect them! Schools have run anti-bullying programs for years because they recognize that allowing children to be hurt because of perceived differences is HORRIBLE. Wearing a skirt doesn’t hurt a kid, but publicly humiliating them and exposing them to parents who will hurt them if they catch them with a skirt — that will scar them for LIFE. Please, please know that this influences the basic safety of children in our schools — do NOT DO THIS TO THEM.


Opposition to Guidance


Policy on Transgender Students

<!DOCTYPE html>

I believe that transgender students in K-12 schools in Virginia should be allowed to use the bathroom of their gender identity, and that the members of school administration should use the pronouns chosen by a student- they should also not be mandated to disclose knowledge of a student's gender identity to parents. As a member of the LGBTQ+ community, I believe that transgender students in the closet or in the process of transitioning should be able to be safe at school and avoid being forcibly outed to people they don't want to be outed to. Trying to make policies that force disclosure and denial of students' transgender identity will pose a severe risk of harm to all K-12 students questioning their gender or proceeding with the process of gender transition. Students deserve a right to make their own choices and be respected in those choices.


I Oppose DOE 22-23 Model Policy on Transgender Students

Racism is stupid. Sexism is stupid. Bigotry is stupid.Trans rights are human rights.??????????????

<!DOCTYPE html>

Racism is stupid.
Sexism is stupid.
Bigotry is stupid.
Trans rights are human rights.??????????????


New school policy for lgbtq students

<!DOCTYPE html>

Many parents do not accept that their child is not "normal ".  Many such children are rejected by their parents and far too many are kicked out of their homes. Some end up living on the streets without food or shelter. Some end up prostituting themselves or commiting suicide. In case you think I am exaggerating, just check with our state and federal law enforcement for the statistics.  To do what the state is proposing,  is to potentially destroy the lives of these children. As it is, even with parental acceptance, the social stigma that goes along with these issues, more often than not, will lead to a very difficult life. No one would choose to live a lifestyle that makes them an outcast. No one gets to choose the traits that they are  born with.

This proposal apparently makes the assumption that all  parents want what is best for their child. Certainly you are acutely aware of how many children are abused by their parents.


support parents being informed

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy is partnering with parents in all matters that pertain to their children. Parents need to be informed of student academic as well as social and emotional behavior at school. This is not a cruel policy nor one that is meant to shame or "out" young people that are discovering who they are. I support policies that include parents in decisions, communication and partnership with schools. </p>


Protect trans kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

This bill will kill trans kids.  Misgendering them will send them into depression, making them likely to commit suicide.  If transphobic parents hear about their children being trans, they will become extremely abusive, and will likely kill their children directly or otherwise.  This bill will not protect anyone, only send trans children into depression and death.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

LGBTQ+ kids have a higher rate of depression and suicide. These guidelines are only going to make that worse. Trans and non binary people have been around for thousands of years. This isn’t new. It’s not something someone chooses to be as part of a fad. These are real kids facing huge decisions. It’s disgusting that the governor has decided he knows better than medical and mental health experts. I can’t wait to vote him out of office. Leave trans and non-binary kids alone!


Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public School

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I strongly oppose this policy change. </p>


Address real issues, support trans students

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This will kill transgender youth and make them unsafe. This does nothing to help our schools or keep our students safe.  Stop playing your nonsense culture wars and focus on real issues </p>


Support Youngkin’s changes

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I am in favor of Youngkin’s revised Policy. </p>


New guidelines are government overreach—infringe upon right to life, liberty, & pursuit of happiness

<!DOCTYPE html>

I believe that these policies constitute government overreach and infringe upon the rights of students’ rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Nowhere in the United States Constitution does it say that harassment is free speech. What logical reason is there for there for a parent to need to know about the decision of their child in regards to something as simple as pronouns? It’s government overreach. Students in many other states are also allowed to pursue sporting activities that align with their identity. This should be the case in Virginia as well. States should be revising their policies to reflect the guidances of the American Psychological Association, American Medical Association, and American Academy of Pediatrics—that people who identify as a gender different than theirs assigned at birth *are* whatever gender they identify as.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Trans kids deserve better. Keep the old guidance. </p>


Oppose these and all policies limited the safety and freedom of transgender children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Transgender students are not dangerous to their peers. We need to support and protect them however we can. </p>


STRONGLY OPPOSE PANDERING AND ANTI-PARENTAL RIGHTS POLICY

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is designed to disempower trans kids and their parents, by setting up onerous requirements including costly legal consultation for newly required documents; as well as onerous requirements for parents of trans kids to formally request that their child's teachers, and the school in general, treat their children with respect and provide a supportive environment where all can thrive and learn.  LGBTQ+ youth have the highest suicide rates, but this policy clearly ignores the rights of parents to keep their children alive.  This policy masquerades as a reasonable and compassionate option, but in fact is an unreasonable and hostile attack on the rights of trans kids' parents, and the right of trans kids to be educated in a supportive environment.  It will increase bullying by making a spectacle out of parents begging the school to treat their children positively, and will empower hostile teachers to deny their requests.  Non-trans kids suffer only when prejudiced parents and craven politicians turn trans kids into criminals.  Yet another example of "parental rights" policies that are anything but.  Combined with tip lines and prohibited books, Virginia is creating a hostile environment for teachers and students alike.  Teacher attrition is leading to larger classroom sizes and decreased attention and learning opportunities for everyone.  Decreasing quality of education for all students is the clear result of this misguided, harmful, and politically craven attack masquerading as "parental rights".


Think of the Children

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please consider that children will be harmed by these proposed rules. If schools are forced to report transgender children they are put at risk of harm from their parents. Parents do not always have their children's best interest at heart, and children need the safety to explore their identities without risk. Transgender children do not stop being transgender because of rules and regulations. They just experience poor mental health, fear for their safety, and are at greater risk of unsafe attempts at gender affirming care. Children need safety to explore themselves and make their own choices. Parents do not own children, and they do not get to control every aspect of their lives.


Some are misunderstanding part of the policy... in regards to bathrooms

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>After reading several comments, it is clear some fellow Virginians are commenting without reading the policy -or-that the language is unclear enough to be interpreted two very different ways.  With regards to bathrooms, single user bathroom and other solutions are mentioned to accommodate genders. With a parent request this can happen.  Also, school policy already supports removing any student that abuses or harasses any other student. Lastly the policy is not really about bathrooms at all, that just is a footnote. </p>
<p> </p>


I oppose this harmful proposal

<!DOCTYPE html>

If enacted, this policy WILL lead to higher rates of depression, bullying, abuse, and suicide amongst youths. This is not protecting children, this actively causing them more harm. Protect trans children, trans rights are human rights!!