I strongly oppose the 2022 proposed policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am a parent of children in the public school system in Virginia. I also have one child who is non binary. Thankfully, their school has been supportive of using their correct pronouns (they/them) and name change, and this has been instrumental in helping my child feel confident and able to be themself as they focus on what they are there to do in school--learn and make/be with friends! However, there is also fear that these rights will be withdrawn, or some teachers will not support my child. Statistics support the fact that those who are not supported in their homes, schools, and community are at greater risk for all kinds of things --suicidality, fewer opportunities for career growth, greater risk of mental health disorders--all which impact our community and state as a whole. Please support our trans and non binary youth by opposing the proposed policy. Our community will be stronger because of it."}'>I am a parent of children in the public school system in Virginia. I also have one child who is non binary. Thankfully, their school has been supportive of using their correct pronouns (they/them) and name change, and this has been instrumental in helping my child feel confident and able to be themself as they focus on what they are there to do in school--learn and make/be with friends! However, there is also fear that these rights will be withdrawn, or some teachers will not support my child. Statistics support the fact that those who are not supported in their homes, schools, and community are at greater risk for all kinds of things --suicidality, fewer opportunities for career growth, greater risk of mental health disorders--all which impact our community and state as a whole. Please support our trans and non binary youth by opposing the proposed policy. Our community will be stronger because of it.


Oppose - Much Too Rigid

I oppose. This policy is MUCH TOO RIGID, putting ALL the decision-making capability in the hands of the parents. The school and the parents should be PARTNERS working for the BEST OUTCOME FOR THE CHILD, not just for the parent. If an impasse is reached, there should be a provision for an impartial mediator/guardian ad litem to be appointed who represents the CHILD, not the parents or the school if the sides are unable to come to a solution that is best for the CHILD.
Opposition to Sec II Part A - Parents have the right to instill in and nurture values, but do *not* have the right to make decisions that ultimately harm the child.
Opposition to Sec II Part B - Parents are *not always* in the best position to determine (a) what names, nicknames, and/or pronouns, if any, shall be used for their child by teachers and school staff while their child is at school, (b) whether their child engages in anycounseling or social transition at school that encourages a gender that differs fromtheir child’s sex, or (c) whether their child expresses a gender that differs with theirchild’s sex while at school. Their preferences should be taken into account but NOT codified to be ALWAYS correct.
It is extremely naive (at best) and dangerous (at worst) to assume and codify that every single parent is the only adult in the child's life capable determining the best interest and outcome for the child. This ownership of parents over their children can lead to significant emotional and physical harm, with no pathway for an outcome that is counter to what the parent's desire, even if it means detriment and damage to the child's welfare.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose. This policy is MUCH TOO RIGID, putting ALL the decision-making capability in the hands of the parents. The school and the parents should be PARTNERS working for the BEST OUTCOME FOR THE CHILD, not just for the parent. If an impasse is reached, there should be a provision for an impartial mediator/guardian ad litem to be appointed who represents the CHILD, not the parents or the school if the sides are unable to come to a solution that is best for the CHILD.

Opposition to Sec II Part A - Parents have the right to instill in and nurture values, but do *not* have the right to make decisions that ultimately harm the child.

Opposition to Sec II Part B - Parents are *not always* in the best position to determine (a) what names, nicknames, and/or pronouns, if any, shall be used for their child by teachers and school staff while their child is at school, (b) whether their child engages in any
counseling or social transition at school that encourages a gender that differs from
their child’s sex, or (c) whether their child expresses a gender that differs with their
child’s sex while at school. Their preferences should be taken into account but NOT codified to be ALWAYS correct.

It is extremely naive (at best) and dangerous (at worst) to assume and codify that every single parent is the only adult in the child's life capable determining the best interest and outcome for the child. This ownership of parents over their children can lead to significant emotional and physical harm, with no pathway for an outcome that is counter to what the parent's desire, even if it means detriment and damage to the child's welfare.


Quit trying to Institutionalize our kids and separate Parents from them

<!DOCTYPE html>

I say BRAVO to Governor Youngkin for finally putting some type of common-sense barriers on the activists that have invaded our school and who we are paying to separate parents from their kids.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose this. Stop pandering to the ignorant and bigoted minority. You should be promoting acceptance, understanding and inclusiveness not hindering it.


Oppose


Support Parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

We support parental rights and First Amendment rights. Thank you Mr Youngkin.


protect trans youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am sickened to think that Virginia is going to hurt our trans youth as opposed to protecting them. They just want to be seen for who they are and treated fairly in school. Our governor needs to educate himself concerning transgender youth. Not allowing them to live authentically is going to cost lives. The suicide rate for trans youth is higher than that of cis gender youth and by stripping them of basic rights in public schools, you are going to drive some to suicide. Have you stopped to consider how you would feel if this was your own child? It shouldn’t have to happen to you or to someone in your life for it to matter."}'>I am sickened to think that Virginia is going to hurt our trans youth as opposed to protecting them. They just want to be seen for who they are and treated fairly in school. Our governor needs to educate himself concerning transgender youth. Not allowing them to live authentically is going to cost lives. The suicide rate for trans youth is higher than that of cis gender youth and by stripping them of basic rights in public schools, you are going to drive some to suicide. Have you stopped to consider how you would feel if this was your own child? It shouldn’t have to happen to you or to someone in your life for it to matter.


STRONGLY SUPPORT  Governor's Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent and grandparent of public school children in Virginia (Henrico County - Gayton, Pocahontas, and Godwin).    I am appalled and angry by what is happening in Virginia schools that are cutting parents out of their responsibility for raising their own children.  Our children are too important to us as their parents to give over control of our children's  most important decisions regarding our children's sexuality.  Our children are legally minors and are under the parents' supervision.  I do not pay my taxes to have principals and school boards to raise my children, especially in areas of human sexuality and gender.  I will not cede this ground to anyone else.    It is he parents' responsibility to protect them and raise them.  They don't belong to the teachers nor to the local school boards.  We parents and families are the ones who have to live with the chaos and clean up the mess made by the schools in the name of some liberal political ideology.

Virginia Code Section 1-240.1 specifies that "a parent has a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the upbringing, education, and care of the parent's child."

Transgender politics have become sickening and an abomination to me and to every responsible parent in our nation.   To make these life altering decisions regarding a child's body, mind, and psychological well being in the name of a homosexual and transgender political ideology, as our school boards and education bureaucrats seem to be doing,  is immoral and evil.

The Governor's Model Policies are finally a step in the direction of sanity in providing guidance to our teachers, administrators, and school boards.   Much more needs to be done to give back to parent's and family's the authority to raise their children with love and care,  This is the parent's sacred duty.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I do not support using the government to trample on the rights of any individual. Please stop singling out LGBTQ kids just to pander to right-wing extremists.


Protect Trans Kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is shameful. Schools should be a safe place for children and this policy will absolutely harm transgender students.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am a 31 year old trans man and I think what the governor plans to do is simply outright wrong! What gives anyone the right to deprive someone from living their truth.


This targets trans children under the guise of supporting parental rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

Section II: Guiding Principles, sub-section A, 3, compels schools to put students to parents. It is the responsibility of the parents to ensure that their child feels loved and respected enough to trust them with important personal information, like their gender identity. If the parents have failed their children in this regard, the child will be put in psychological and possibly physical danger if their parents are informed about their gender identity or sexuality. The well being of children must come before the need of adults to exert control over others.

in section V: Development, sub-section C, it is stated that the First Amendment protects individuals from being compelled to use the proffered pronouns of another individual. The willful and malicious misgendering of a person is a form or bullying and harassment. Schools often curtail freedom of speech in order to protect students by banning all forms of bullying. Section VI: Additional Related Laws, sub-sections 11, 13, and 14, state that bullying and abusive work environments are prohibited, schools should prohibit bullying, and schools should provide character education. Treating one’s classmates with basic dignity and respect should be included in character education. This cannot be done if students and even teachers are allowed to purposefully invalidate the identity of a student by intentionally using differing pronouns from the child’s stated preference.


Strongly opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

Strongly opposed. We must protect the rights and mental health of our children. Children and teens in the LGBTQ community have some of the highest suicide rates and homelessness rates in the country. Stop subjecting them to more cruelty.


Do you really care about Transgender Kids?

<!DOCTYPE html>

The school not sharing important emotional information with parents should be a basis for civil action against the school. Has anyone looked at the studies on gender dysphoria and transitioning? Highlights of Peer Review Study on Transgender Kids Everyone in the school administration is concerned with parents pressuring kids not to be transgender, has anyone even considered the onslaught of social, media and now school pressure to transition? If you didn't go through an awkward stage in your teens of, feeling uncomfortable with your sexuality or having your hormones drive decisions, then you are in the minority. Children that go through adolescence are going through a difficult time regardless of what they think is happening and or why. Everyone who cares for them needs to be working together to make sure they do not make rash decisions that they may regret and cannot undo. Why is everyone so eager to transition a child, why can't we care enough to kids are mature enough to ensure they are doing the right thing for themselves by ensuring their brain is developed enough for true critical decision making. The law should be 18 or older before transitioning and making a life altering decision. Most sane adult transgender people would agree.


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>As a parent and someone with many years of experience in the mental health field I oppose this measure and feel it will be detrimental to the well-being of LGBTQ+ children. What this boils down to is forcing children to either hide their identity or be outed. Making self-expression of identity taboo and forcibly outing LGBTQ+ individuals is extremely damaging to their mental health. There is no real reason to make this an issue in need of regulatory reform. Calling someone a name they prefer is not difficult or unreasonable. We do it all the time with abbreviated names, nicknames, etc. No different. If someone asked to be called Kate instead of Katherine would an educator really need to inform their parent to be sure this was something they approved of? It never has been in my experience. It is similarly not  hard to refer to someone with a preferred pronoun. It causes no objective harm to anyone to respect this personal choice of a student. Educators that feel these requests infringe on their belief systems should take a good strong look at themselves and why this is such an impossible ask. I want teachers to be kind to my children and provide an education. That's it. This responsibility to inform parents is a fabricated mechanism that will marginalize and already marginalized population. I am appalled that with all of the issues with safety and education that our current administration chooses to focus on this. Unacceptable. </p>


Trans Kids are Amazing

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I am the proud parent of a trans young adult and I strongly oppose these hateful changes to policy in schools. Prior to Governor Northam's policies, when in a non-supportive school environment, my child was sullen, unable to concentrate on school work, and was hospitalized twice with suicidal ideation.  After coming out and moving to a supportive school which followed healthy and pro-child, pro-family guidelines with my whole-hearted support, my child was able to be themselves, use the name they chose, dress comfortably, and not bother anybody when they used a bathroom that conformed with their appearance and identity.  They came out of their shell, did much better in class, and just blossomed into a remarkable, creative, and caring person who goes out of their way to help other kids who are struggling.  The proposed policies embolden adults and other kids to bully kids in school and are the opposite of a caring learning environment.  Requiring teachers, counselors, and staff to out vulnerable kids is despicable."}">I am the proud parent of a trans young adult and I strongly oppose these hateful changes to policy in schools. Prior to Governor Northam's policies, when in a non-supportive school environment, my child was sullen, unable to concentrate on school work, and was hospitalized twice with suicidal ideation. After coming out and moving to a supportive school which followed healthy and pro-child, pro-family guidelines with my whole-hearted support, my child was able to be themselves, use the name they chose, dress comfortably, and not bother anybody when they used a bathroom that conformed with their appearance and identity. They came out of their shell, did much better in class, and just blossomed into a remarkable, creative, and caring person who goes out of their way to help other kids who are struggling. The proposed policies embolden adults and other kids to bully kids in school and are the opposite of a caring learning environment. Requiring teachers, counselors, and staff to out vulnerable kids is despicable.


Choose kindness

I OPPOSE Virginia's Department of Education 2022 guidance, as well as Governor Youngkin's attempts to force school systems to comply.1. Schools should be safe havens for our children, but the 2022 Recommendations would make school decidedly less safe for a minority population that is already discriminated against, maligned, and endangered everywhere they go. Not only will these recommendations fail to protect these vulnerable children, they make it socially acceptable to treat them badly. You are sending the message that it is okay to bully kids just because they are different. Read that again: you are promoting bullying.2. Youngkin and other politicians have claimed that this is in support of ALL parents. As the parent of a transgender child, I do not feel my needs are being supported by this guidance. And we DID legally change our child's name when she came out -- if insurance companies and other entities are legally bound to respect that (and they are), then teachers do not have the prerogative to call our child by a different name. 3. Please look at the science: transgender kids suffer irreparable emotional damage by being dead-named and having the wrong pronouns used. Representative Good said that schools are coaching kids to become transgender, which is delusional, but he is right that schools have influence: my daughter had supportive parents and friends who supported her, and she STILL attempted suicide because the administration at her high school pretty much complied with the 2022 guidance: they dead-named her, tolerated her repeated bullying, and forced her to use an outdoor activity bathroom which put her at serious bodily risk from predators. We had to uproot and move to a more supportive school system to save her life, and now you would try to take that away from us.4. School systems have traditionally had the autonomy to make their own decisions about treatment of transgender children in schools. As a result, there were school systems in the Commonwealth who chose to reject the 2021 DOE recommendations that provided protections for transgender children. I wasn't happy about that, but you can't have it both ways -- you can't give them autonomy to choose conservative ideals over "liberal" recommendations, then deny them the autonomy to choose liberal ideals.I think we need to take a hard look at the type of people we are becoming. When did it become socially and politically acceptable to target children who aren't harming anyone, just because of who they are? Please look at the science, listen to all points of view, and be kind. Always be kind.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I OPPOSE Virginia's Department of Education 2022 guidance, as well as Governor Youngkin's attempts to force school systems to comply.\n\n1. Schools should be safe havens for our children, but the 2022 Recommendations would make school decidedly less safe for a minority population that is already discriminated against, maligned, and endangered everywhere they go. Not only will these recommendations fail to protect these vulnerable children, they make it socially acceptable to treat them badly. You are sending the message that it is okay to bully kids just because they are different. Read that again: you are promoting bullying.\n\n2. Youngkin and other politicians have claimed that this is in support of ALL parents. As the parent of a transgender child, I do not feel my needs are being supported by this guidance. And we DID legally change our child's name when she came out -- if insurance companies and other entities are legally bound to respect that (and they are), then teachers do not have the prerogative to call our child by a different name. \n\n3. Please look at the science: transgender kids suffer irreparable emotional damage by being dead-named and having the wrong pronouns used. Representative Good said that schools are coaching kids to become transgender, which is delusional, but he is right that schools have influence: my daughter had supportive parents and friends who supported her, and she STILL attempted suicide because the administration at her high school pretty much complied with the 2022 guidance: they dead-named her, tolerated her repeated bullying, and forced her to use an outdoor activity bathroom which put her at serious bodily risk from predators. We had to uproot and move to a more supportive school system to save her life, and now you would try to take that away from us.\n\n4. School systems have traditionally had the autonomy to make their own decisions about treatment of transgender children in schools. As a result, there were school systems in the Commonwealth who chose to reject the 2021 DOE recommendations that provided protections for transgender children. I wasn't happy about that, but you can't have it both ways -- you can't give them autonomy to choose conservative ideals over \"liberal\" recommendations, then deny them the autonomy to choose liberal ideals.\n\nI think we need to take a hard look at the type of people we are becoming. When did it become socially and politically acceptable to target children who aren't harming anyone, just because of who they are?  Please look at the science, listen to all points of view, and be kind. Always be kind."}">I OPPOSE Virginia's Department of Education 2022 guidance, as well as Governor Youngkin's attempts to force school systems to comply.

1. Schools should be safe havens for our children, but the 2022 Recommendations would make school decidedly less safe for a minority population that is already discriminated against, maligned, and endangered everywhere they go. Not only will these recommendations fail to protect these vulnerable children, they make it socially acceptable to treat them badly. You are sending the message that it is okay to bully kids just because they are different. Read that again: you are promoting bullying.

2. Youngkin and other politicians have claimed that this is in support of ALL parents. As the parent of a transgender child, I do not feel my needs are being supported by this guidance. And we DID legally change our child's name when she came out -- if insurance companies and other entities are legally bound to respect that (and they are), then teachers do not have the prerogative to call our child by a different name.

3. Please look at the science: transgender kids suffer irreparable emotional damage by being dead-named and having the wrong pronouns used. Representative Good said that schools are coaching kids to become transgender, which is delusional, but he is right that schools have influence: my daughter had supportive parents and friends who supported her, and she STILL attempted suicide because the administration at her high school pretty much complied with the 2022 guidance: they dead-named her, tolerated her repeated bullying, and forced her to use an outdoor activity bathroom which put her at serious bodily risk from predators. We had to uproot and move to a more supportive school system to save her life, and now you would try to take that away from us.

4. School systems have traditionally had the autonomy to make their own decisions about treatment of transgender children in schools. As a result, there were school systems in the Commonwealth who chose to reject the 2021 DOE recommendations that provided protections for transgender children. I wasn't happy about that, but you can't have it both ways -- you can't give them autonomy to choose conservative ideals over "liberal" recommendations, then deny them the autonomy to choose liberal ideals.

I think we need to take a hard look at the type of people we are becoming. When did it become socially and politically acceptable to target children who aren't harming anyone, just because of who they are? Please look at the science, listen to all points of view, and be kind. Always be kind.


Protect Trans and all LGBTQ students

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I strongly oppose Governor Youngkin's proposed policy for trans students.  As a former school principal and central office administrator, I dealt with students who were harassed and bullied because they were different. The safety and mental health of LGBTQ students will be further at risk if this policy is adopted. Parental support is important and crucial to the student feeling protected; however, an automatic or required notification of parents of trans students who are not out, could put them in danger.  School counselors and administrators must be very careful and sensitive in communicating this information to parents while foremost supporting the safety of the student. Some parents will need ongoing support and information as they provide a safe and supportive home environment for their trans students.  \nThis proposed policy of Governor Youngkin's turns the clock back in Virginia and will lead to violation of the civil rights of venerable students and even threats to their safety.  "}">I strongly oppose Governor Youngkin's proposed policy for trans students. As a former school principal and central office administrator, I dealt with students who were harassed and bullied because they were different. The safety and mental health of LGBTQ students will be further at risk if this policy is adopted. Parental support is important and crucial to the student feeling protected; however, an automatic or required notification of parents of trans students who are not out, could put them in danger. School counselors and administrators must be very careful and sensitive in communicating this information to parents while foremost supporting the safety of the student. Some parents will need ongoing support and information as they provide a safe and supportive home environment for their trans students.
This proposed policy of Governor Youngkin's turns the clock back in Virginia and will lead to violation of the civil rights of venerable students and even threats to their safety.


OPPOSED

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am strongly opposed to this change and it's masked attempt to devalue and discriminate against people.


Strongly oppose the changes

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the proposed changes. And I am disgusted and humiliated that my state is even suggesting these policies.  Shame on our governor and leaders for proposing these ideas and using trans children - an already marginalized group (with the highest suicide ideation and suicide attempts) who are just gaining stability and respect - as a political football for cheap political gains with the base. As a psychologist, I know the damage that this piece of legislation will have on Virginia children.  There will be more suicides and the governor and our state leaders will have their blood on their hands. I urge you in the strongest possible terms not to change the policy.

Thank you for your time and attention.


Violates My Religious Faith

My Unitarian Universalist faith affirms as its first principle the inherent worth and dignity of every person. The proposed policy on transgender students in Virginia schools violates that practical moral principle and I am therefore compelled to oppose it. Every transgender student is a natural person with the inalienable dignity of individual agency and a right to privacy which is denied them in this proposed policy. Each of these transgender person’s worth is inherent to their person, not residing in the mind of, or by force of, another person, even a parent. Transgender students deserve the informed guidance and compassionate counsel of trusted adults, denied them under this policy, as they navigate their personal authentic experience. We all hope that the trusted adult in a child's life is a parent but the plain reality for time immemorial has been that children often turn to an aunt or uncle, a religious educator at church, or a teacher at school who will maintain confidentiality. Implementing this regressive policy will not change that dynamic of childhood development.The fifth principle of my Unitarian Universalist faith affirms the right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large, which I also believe to be violated by the irregular process by which this proposed policy has been brought. Some provisions of the proposed policy are already plainly federally unconstitutional under Grimm v. Gloucester.As a matter of conscience, I will continue on the side of love in defense of the inherent worth and dignity of all people and in firm opposition to this proposed policy which I believe does harm to transgender students.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"My Unitarian Universalist faith affirms as its first principle the inherent worth and dignity of every person. The proposed policy on transgender students in Virginia schools violates that practical moral principle and I am therefore compelled to oppose it. Every transgender student is a natural person with the inalienable dignity of individual agency and a right to privacy which is denied them in this proposed policy. Each of these transgender person’s worth is inherent to their person, not residing in the mind of, or by force of, another person, even a parent. \n\nTransgender students deserve the informed guidance and compassionate counsel of trusted adults, denied them under this policy, as they navigate their personal authentic experience. We all hope that the trusted adult in a child's life is a parent but the plain reality for time immemorial has been that children often turn to an aunt or uncle, a religious educator at church,  or a teacher at school who will maintain confidentiality. Implementing this regressive policy will not change that dynamic of childhood development.\n\nThe fifth principle of my Unitarian Universalist faith affirms the right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large, which I also believe to be violated by the irregular process by which this proposed policy has been brought. Some provisions of the proposed policy are already plainly federally unconstitutional under Grimm v. Gloucester.\n\nAs a matter of conscience, I will continue on the side of love in defense of the inherent worth and dignity of all people and in firm opposition to this proposed policy which I believe does harm to transgender students.\n"}">My Unitarian Universalist faith affirms as its first principle the inherent worth and dignity of every person. The proposed policy on transgender students in Virginia schools violates that practical moral principle and I am therefore compelled to oppose it. Every transgender student is a natural person with the inalienable dignity of individual agency and a right to privacy which is denied them in this proposed policy. Each of these transgender person’s worth is inherent to their person, not residing in the mind of, or by force of, another person, even a parent.

Transgender students deserve the informed guidance and compassionate counsel of trusted adults, denied them under this policy, as they navigate their personal authentic experience. We all hope that the trusted adult in a child's life is a parent but the plain reality for time immemorial has been that children often turn to an aunt or uncle, a religious educator at church, or a teacher at school who will maintain confidentiality. Implementing this regressive policy will not change that dynamic of childhood development.

The fifth principle of my Unitarian Universalist faith affirms the right of conscience and the use of the democratic process within our congregations and in society at large, which I also believe to be violated by the irregular process by which this proposed policy has been brought. Some provisions of the proposed policy are already plainly federally unconstitutional under Grimm v. Gloucester.

As a matter of conscience, I will continue on the side of love in defense of the inherent worth and dignity of all people and in firm opposition to this proposed policy which I believe does harm to transgender students.


The fear and shame will keep going and teachers won't be able to do anything about it.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I came out as trans when I was 12, I knew something felt different ever since I was 9 though which was around the time I hit puberty. It's terrifying being a young trans individual trying to discover himself in a world that seems like it just wishes you weren't around. School was especially hard but teachers respecting who I am made it so much easier. Kids would bully me for existing, but knowing my teachers cared about me, used whatever pronouns made me feel like me, making sure I felt safe in the bathroom that made me most comfortable, all of that was what made me alive and who I am today. I once had half a classroom making fun of trans people, calling them stupid and gross, I was so scared and stressed. I'm so lucky to have had that amazing substitute teacher let me step out of the classroom and actively talk to that class about the horrible thing they were doing and how it affected their classmates. What he did allowed for those students to learn what they were doing was hurting someone and most of them came to me to make sure I was okay and apologize. I thought I was going to be alone again, scared and feeling like there was something wrong with me, but thanks to that teacher being able to talk about the subject I made friends and was able to feel safer in my classroom. If he wasn't able to do that I would've had to sit there and let myself be harmed, he respected me and stood up for me. He made me feel like a person that mattered. All teachers should be able to do that without fear of being fired or worse. If this passes, the classroom won't be a safe place anymore, teachers won't be able to help their students, trans youth will be left afraid like I was, except they won't have a happy ending like I did. That fear and shame will keep going and teachers won't be able to do anything about it."}">I came out as trans when I was 12, I knew something felt different ever since I was 9 though which was around the time I hit puberty. It's terrifying being a young trans individual trying to discover himself in a world that seems like it just wishes you weren't around. School was especially hard but teachers respecting who I am made it so much easier. Kids would bully me for existing, but knowing my teachers cared about me, used whatever pronouns made me feel like me, making sure I felt safe in the bathroom that made me most comfortable, all of that was what made me alive and who I am today. I once had half a classroom making fun of trans people, calling them stupid and gross, I was so scared and stressed. I'm so lucky to have had that amazing substitute teacher let me step out of the classroom and actively talk to that class about the horrible thing they were doing and how it affected their classmates. What he did allowed for those students to learn what they were doing was hurting someone and most of them came to me to make sure I was okay and apologize. I thought I was going to be alone again, scared and feeling like there was something wrong with me, but thanks to that teacher being able to talk about the subject I made friends and was able to feel safer in my classroom. If he wasn't able to do that I would've had to sit there and let myself be harmed, he respected me and stood up for me. He made me feel like a person that mattered. All teachers should be able to do that without fear of being fired or worse. If this passes, the classroom won't be a safe place anymore, teachers won't be able to help their students, trans youth will be left afraid like I was, except they won't have a happy ending like I did. That fear and shame will keep going and teachers won't be able to do anything about it.


I oppose bigotry!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am a retired inpatient psychiatric nurse. I have cared for numerous young people after a suicide attempt because of their torment from not being accepted as they are. It is always heartbreaking to hear their stories of being bullied or being rejected by their family resulting in such desperation as to lead them to attempt suicide - some succeed. \nI strongly oppose this new proposed guidance for schools. Things were beginning to get better for young people who understand themselves to be \"different\". Please do  NOT allow this guidance to become policy. It will harm many young people who deserve respect and protection."}'>I am a retired inpatient psychiatric nurse. I have cared for numerous young people after a suicide attempt because of their torment from not being accepted as they are. It is always heartbreaking to hear their stories of being bullied or being rejected by their family resulting in such desperation as to lead them to attempt suicide - some succeed.
I strongly oppose this new proposed guidance for schools. Things were beginning to get better for young people who understand themselves to be "different". Please do NOT allow this guidance to become policy. It will harm many young people who deserve respect and protection.


Trans youth deserve safe schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"The VDOE's 2022 model policy is directly harmful to transgender youth and Virginia schools should not act according to this policy. I am a social worker who has worked directly with transgender youth — many trans youth I have worked with have strained (or nonexistent) relationships with their parents and schools, which this policy would make worse. Decades of research have shown that gender-affirming environments in schools can protect trans youth, who are at a higher risk for psychosocial problems, like mental illness and substance use. Psychological literature about gender dysphoria shows that neither parents nor teachers should attempt to control a child's gender expression. This proposed model policy is plainly discriminatory against transgender students in Virginia. Schools across the Commonwealth should not implement this type of blatant discrimination."}">The VDOE's 2022 model policy is directly harmful to transgender youth and Virginia schools should not act according to this policy. I am a social worker who has worked directly with transgender youth — many trans youth I have worked with have strained (or nonexistent) relationships with their parents and schools, which this policy would make worse. Decades of research have shown that gender-affirming environments in schools can protect trans youth, who are at a higher risk for psychosocial problems, like mental illness and substance use. Psychological literature about gender dysphoria shows that neither parents nor teachers should attempt to control a child's gender expression. This proposed model policy is plainly discriminatory against transgender students in Virginia. Schools across the Commonwealth should not implement this type of blatant discrimination.


Virginia is for Everyone!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I am absolutely disgusted by the actions of the Youngkin administration. From pure incompetence to incredible malice they have shown us nothing but the worst. I am completely against this transphobic, homophobic, bigoted policy and will actively work to make Virginia a welcoming place to all. </p>


I OPPOSE the guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I OPPOSE the guidance. School is meant to be a safe place for our children to grow and learn, yet everyone in charge seems hellbent on destroying the lives of our youth. Children can't focus on education or curricular while being sexually harassed by adults who break down restroom stall doors to check their body parts; or outing them to their parents, whose love is conditional, and open them up to all forms of abuse, homelessness, and/or death; or forcing them to be ostracized by everyone and drive them to self-harm and/or suicide. This guidance does nothing but kill and abuse trans children. This will happen to children who they'll 'suspect' to be trans, even if they aren't. Children who don't fit an adult's idea of \"cis woman\" or \"cis male\" will be hurt. This is not acceptable! If you really care about our children, why is your focus not on ending gun violence, ceasing the spread of misinformation, sort the housing crisis, and granting minority children protection? Enough is enough."}">I OPPOSE the guidance. School is meant to be a safe place for our children to grow and learn, yet everyone in charge seems hellbent on destroying the lives of our youth. Children can't focus on education or curricular while being sexually harassed by adults who break down restroom stall doors to check their body parts; or outing them to their parents, whose love is conditional, and open them up to all forms of abuse, homelessness, and/or death; or forcing them to be ostracized by everyone and drive them to self-harm and/or suicide. This guidance does nothing but kill and abuse trans children. This will happen to children who they'll 'suspect' to be trans, even if they aren't. Children who don't fit an adult's idea of "cis woman" or "cis male" will be hurt. This is not acceptable! If you really care about our children, why is your focus not on ending gun violence, ceasing the spread of misinformation, sort the housing crisis, and granting minority children protection? Enough is enough.


Shutup and let us trans the kids you bigot!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Gay people in 2008: "We don't have an agenda, we just want the same rights as everyone else."

LGBTQIAA*!%&@^ in 2022: If you don't let us tell little boys that they're secretly girls and keep it from their parents you're a nazi hitler bigot transphobic racist fascist!!


<!DOCTYPE html>

Governor Youngkin’s bill tries to erase trans and nonbinary youth from the classroom. This may create a hostile & potentially dangerous school environment. As a Virginia teacher and parent, I strongly oppose this bill.


Students Deserve Better Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

I'm a member of the trans community and I am so disheartened by the proposed rules that limit trans peoples roles in classrooms, bathrooms, and gym class. This community is already dealing with so much we should be offering more support not more obstacles.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the draft policy and want the VDOE to reject it. Trans affirming school policy is important to me as a family member of non-binary adults.


EXTREME OPPOSITION

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am an aunt of a trans child. After turning 7 years old, my neice told her parents that her pronouns are now she/her. She changed her name and everything. She went from William to Willow. My sister (my neice's mother) majored in Psychology at W&M. She knows that most trans kids know that they are trans by the time they are 6 years old, so she was surprised when her son decided she was actually her daughter at 7. But nonetheless, my sister and our entire family have fully supported this change in identity. A child should be able to be whoever they want to be. No matter how old they are. Adults do not always know best. Let these trans kids be who they want to be. Respect them for who they are. DO NOT LET THESE POLICIES PASS. This country is supposed to be the land of the free. I want my neice to be free to be herself.


Opposed


I support trans students

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support trans students and we should do all we can as a community to make them feel included and accepted!


oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

STRONGLY OPPOSE! TRANS RIGHTS!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Restricting the *personal* rights of individual trans and nonbinary kids in Virginia's schools is damaging and dangerous. The more trans and nonbinary kids are othered, restricted, and unsupported to be their true and full selves on their own terms, the more we risk losing them to suicide and substance abuse, let alone self-harm and damaging their mental health. I've been proud to live in Virginia since I moved here 8 years ago, but proposals such as this one completely destroy that pride. I am vehemently, fundamentally opposed to this proposal."}">Restricting the *personal* rights of individual trans and nonbinary kids in Virginia's schools is damaging and dangerous. The more trans and nonbinary kids are othered, restricted, and unsupported to be their true and full selves on their own terms, the more we risk losing them to suicide and substance abuse, let alone self-harm and damaging their mental health. I've been proud to live in Virginia since I moved here 8 years ago, but proposals such as this one completely destroy that pride. I am vehemently, fundamentally opposed to this proposal.


STRONGLY OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>This policy is not based in research, fact, or science. All this policy will do, in the long run, is decrease the support for our transgender youth population and consequently, children will die by suicide. If this administration is okay with putting kids in such dangerous circumstances, one must truly question the morality of these individuals. This policy is reactionary, fearful, and poorly written. If this administration is going to use an evangelical agenda to exercise power, they might as well do it more subtly. </p>


Oppose.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Let kids be kids, kids have rights just as well as their parents. If I hadn’t developed my own beliefs and I was forced to do what my parents bid, I would have run away from home and my mental and physical health would have been way worse off. Stop forcing Christian beliefs on everyone a lot of the world doesn’t agree.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Trans people deserve the right to be who they are. Why should anyone else tell them how they should identify or behave? They aren’t hurting anyone by being themselves. When people are authentically themselves they are happier which makes our communities better places. The latest policies don’t keep trans children safe yet children’s safety is what’s being touted as the benefit for the new policies. My niece is trans and she is perfectly perfect the way she is."}'>Trans people deserve the right to be who they are. Why should anyone else tell them how they should identify or behave? They aren’t hurting anyone by being themselves. When people are authentically themselves they are happier which makes our communities better places. The latest policies don’t keep trans children safe yet children’s safety is what’s being touted as the benefit for the new policies. My niece is trans and she is perfectly perfect the way she is.


Strongly Oppose! Would Cause Deep and Lasting Harm to Students, Families, and Communities

<!DOCTYPE html>

The proposed policies are very harmful, particularly to trans students and their families, but to everyone else in the community.

I am a lawyer who has helped draft many briefs explaining to the courts the psychological and even physical harm that policies like these cause. The vast bulk of scientific research shows this again and again. Vulnerable children whose identity as trans or nonbinary is rejected and effectively erased at school suffer higher rates of depression and suicide (the ultimate physical harm). Their sense of safety and security is destroyed, they are subject to more vicious bullying, they cannot focus on learning, and the list goes on and on.

In addition to my familiarity with research in this area, I work closely with social workers across the country who see first-hand the effects these policies have on the students who are targeted, as well as the harm to the learning environment overall. I have friends and colleagues who are trans and non-binary - delightful and productive people who have had to fight hard at every step to achieve their place in society. Who knows how much more they could contribute and how much happier their lives could be, if they had not been held back by transphobic policies and attitudes. Who knows what today's students will accomplish tomorrow, if we don't hold them back.

We owe the next generation so much more - we need our schools and our government to move forward, not backward.

Please reject policies that are not supported by research or experience - policies that are objectively shown to cause irreparable harm to our children.


Oppose


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Youngkin has no right to treat his citizens like this. If you do not believe in equality for the people who are supposed to trust you, you have absolutely no right to say what we can and cannot do to be happy and ourselves.


Protect our Children

<!DOCTYPE html>

The insanity has reached its peak. We the people...the tax payers have been held hostage with far leftist insanity and psuedo scientific "theories" which hold zero evidence of reality based thinking. Hiding things from our parents and influencing long term decision making on youngsters who often don't consider their future well being in exchange for immediage "pay back" at a dissapointed parent or misunderstanding world.  Please stop the madness with all of this hormone therapy, non parental notofication, and education of mentally ill topics at the hands of a few at the detrement of the many.


In Support of Trans Youth and Opposition of Youngkin Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am a behavioral health provider in Northern Va and parent of two students enrolled in FCPS schools. I vehemently oppose this policy and ask the VDOE to reject it. Please see the 2021 Fairfax Youth Survey results for compelling and disturbing data on the rates of depression, stress and suicidal ideation among our trans, gay/lesbian and bisexual youth. 60% of trans youth reported thoughts of suicide during the survey period, compared to 16.5% overall among all 8-12 grade students; and trans students were almost 4 times as likely to report attempting suicide as the overall population of high school students surveyed. Approving this policy will ENSURE that vulnerable students continue to experience increased levels of isolation, marginalization and discrimination, and feel unwelcome and unwanted by our public education system. Approving this policy would be a blight on the reputation of the county and the county should be prepared to accept responsibility for the devastating mental health consequences that will be a direct result of the implementation of such a medieval, monstrous policy."}'>I am a behavioral health provider in Northern Va and parent of two students enrolled in FCPS schools. I vehemently oppose this policy and ask the VDOE to reject it. Please see the 2021 Fairfax Youth Survey results for compelling and disturbing data on the rates of depression, stress and suicidal ideation among our trans, gay/lesbian and bisexual youth. 60% of trans youth reported thoughts of suicide during the survey period, compared to 16.5% overall among all 8-12 grade students; and trans students were almost 4 times as likely to report attempting suicide as the overall population of high school students surveyed. Approving this policy will ENSURE that vulnerable students continue to experience increased levels of isolation, marginalization and discrimination, and feel unwelcome and unwanted by our public education system. Approving this policy would be a blight on the reputation of the county and the county should be prepared to accept responsibility for the devastating mental health consequences that will be a direct result of the implementation of such a medieval, monstrous policy.


We support, accept, and love our kids. ALL kids.

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent of a wonderfully complex trans kid, I strongly oppose Gov. Youngkin's guidance. Full stop -- we support and love our kids in their wondrous variety.


Opposition to the 2022 Model Policies

Washington Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights & Urban Affairs

<!DOCTYPE html>

The Washington Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs opposes the 2022 Model Policies and urges the Virginia Department of Education to reject them.   The Committee’s full comments are available at  https://www.washlaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/Wash-Lawyer-Cmte-Comments-on-2022-VA-Model-Policies.pdf.

In sum, the proposed Virginia Department of Education’s “2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools” (“Model Policies”), if enacted, will create a hostile education environment for transgender and gender non-conforming students in violation of federal and state law.  This hostile environment will cause severe harm to an already vulnerable group of students: in 2022 Trevor Project revealed that “nearly 1 in 5 transgender and non-binary youth reported having seriously considered suicide, more than three-quarters of transgender experience symptoms of anxiety and 37 percent have been harmed due to gender identity.” The Trevor Project, National Survey on LGBTQ Youth Mental Health (2022), https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/.

The Model Policies treat transgender students differently by preventing transgender students from being recognized by their gender and preferred names and separating students based on biological sex, rather than gender, for a host of school-related activities. The Model Policy will also force schools to out transgender students to their parents and family members, creating distrust between students and trusted adults at school, and potentially severing family relationships and placing young people at risk. Policies such as these, which are classifications based on sex and that target a vulnerable population, are at odds with the Equal Protection Clause of the Constitution and Title IX.  As the Fourth Circuit has unequivocally stated, it is part of a consensus of courts holding that “equal protection and Title IX can protect transgender students from . . . policies that prohibit them from affirming their gender.” Grimm v. Gloucester Cty. Sch. Bd., 972 F.3d 586, 593 (4th Cir. 2020).  If adopted, the Model Policies will require Virginia public schools to discriminate against transgender students, leading to costly litigation and risking federal funding for Virginia’s schools.

Virginia’s Model Policies should create an inclusive environment for transgender students across Virginia and recognize the specific challenges transgender students may face navigating their school environment.  Indeed, these policies walk back the very protections that the Virginia Department of Education promulgated in 2021, based on widely recognized evidence based best practices, which upheld the rights of transgender students to participate in school programming, access same-gender facilities, and be recognized by their correct names and pronouns.

The Model Policies will create an unconstitutional hostile education environment for transgender and non-binary students in Virginia public schools and transgender students will face an increased amount of discrimination – schools will deny them educational opportunities, subject them to increased harassment, bullying, and even violence, and violate their privacy as they navigate their gender identity.  The Washington Lawyers’ Committee opposes the exclusionary 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity, and Respect for All Students and Parents in Virginia’s Public Schools, which provide for neither privacy, dignity, nor respect for transgender students.


Strongly Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the proposed model policy.

I am a pastor in Arlington, VA who has been honored to work in churches and church programs with trans youth and young adults who are amazing reflections of the love of God.

The possibility that these beloved children of God, these community members full of passion for justice and for neighbor, could be subject to discrimination by these proposed VDOE policies is unacceptable.

The proposed model policies are rooted in transphobia, seeking to further harm trans and nonbinary kids, while prohibiting teachers and school staff supporting their students by using their names and pronouns.

It is simply unthinkable. We cannot allow such discriminatory policies in our state. I imagine the future for my child. I do not want any child to enter a Virginia school system where such policies exist and they are not allowed to be their true self.

I believe children are created, as the Psalms say, fearfully and wonderfully by their God. Virginia schools cannot be in the business of discriminating against the wonderful trans and nonbinary children in our state.

I strongly oppose the proposed model policy.


Just support kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a teacher, it's not my job to make a kid's life harder. If they're a good person, do their work, want to learn, and treat others with respect, I will continue to call them whatever name they prefer. I'm here to teach and support my students NOT infuse any idea about who I think any kid should be.


Gov Youngkin's Guidelines

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I read over the Governor's Model Guidelines for transgender students.  I think that the guidelines protect the rights of these troubled kids as well as those of their parents who are ultimately responsible for them.  </p>


Strongly oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Strongly oppose this. This is horrible. Listen to Virginians. </p>


Transgender student policy by Gov Youngkin


OPPOSE

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I strongly OPPOSE Youngkin’s draft policy on trans and non-binary students and want the VDOE to reject them. As a Christian who regularly attends a church (Hope United Church of Christ in Alexandria, VA) that affirms all people, I believe our schools should do the same. \n\nStudies show that trans and non-binary students who are not accepted are much more likely to die by suicide, which is tragic. When schools are accepting, it can help prevent these senseless deaths. It can also contribute to a more just society, where all people are treated with dignity. \n\nIf Youngkin’s draft policy is made a reality, it would be a big step backwards for our state, undoing much of the recent progress we have made. "}'>I strongly OPPOSE Youngkin’s draft policy on trans and non-binary students and want the VDOE to reject them. As a Christian who regularly attends a church (Hope United Church of Christ in Alexandria, VA) that affirms all people, I believe our schools should do the same.

Studies show that trans and non-binary students who are not accepted are much more likely to die by suicide, which is tragic. When schools are accepting, it can help prevent these senseless deaths. It can also contribute to a more just society, where all people are treated with dignity.

If Youngkin’s draft policy is made a reality, it would be a big step backwards for our state, undoing much of the recent progress we have made.


<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"If Virginia schools did not have a safe and inclusive environment for LGBTQ+ youth, I would be afraid for those youths. They deserve to feel safe at school. Allowing children to express themselves is important for their physiological safety and a gender nonconforming child's experience does not negatively impact the life of a gender conforming child. This is important to me as an ally because I want all youths to feel comfortable and safe at school, and excluding a group because they are LGBTQ+ will harm them and make other children fear that they might be at risk as well."}">If Virginia schools did not have a safe and inclusive environment for LGBTQ+ youth, I would be afraid for those youths. They deserve to feel safe at school. Allowing children to express themselves is important for their physiological safety and a gender nonconforming child's experience does not negatively impact the life of a gender conforming child. This is important to me as an ally because I want all youths to feel comfortable and safe at school, and excluding a group because they are LGBTQ+ will harm them and make other children fear that they might be at risk as well.


<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the draft policy and want the VDOE to reject them. This is inhumane and cruel. Trans youth deserve to be protected in schools!


Support LGBTQ Kids and Families

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Everyone should be protected by the law regardless of their identity. Public school must protect the entire public! There is no room for discrimination in our school system. </p>


I was a trans teen in the Virginia Public School System

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I was, a trans teen in the Virginia Public School System very recently. It was a scary hard time. My parents were not supportive. Protections of my privacy that let administrators talk to me about my gender without having to out me, and being allowed to read stories about and from the perspective of people life me, these were life saving accommodations. Please oppose these changes that would take these away from other children. Please don't kill kids like me."}">I was, a trans teen in the Virginia Public School System very recently. It was a scary hard time. My parents were not supportive. Protections of my privacy that let administrators talk to me about my gender without having to out me, and being allowed to read stories about and from the perspective of people life me, these were life saving accommodations. Please oppose these changes that would take these away from other children. Please don't kill kids like me.


My story

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"When I came out back in highschool to my teachers, it was incredibly easy for them to accept me and begin using my appropriate name and pronouns. I realized that 95% of school staff are comfortable using correct names for their students because they understand the importance of it to their confidence. The VDOE's disregard for transgender students is clear, and once again teachers are the ones left to do the work in supporting their students in a system that is leaving them behind. I hope for the sake of my younger, trans sibling in highschool that these rules are not passed so they can have an equal and normal school experience such as cisgender students get to have."}">When I came out back in highschool to my teachers, it was incredibly easy for them to accept me and begin using my appropriate name and pronouns. I realized that 95% of school staff are comfortable using correct names for their students because they understand the importance of it to their confidence. The VDOE's disregard for transgender students is clear, and once again teachers are the ones left to do the work in supporting their students in a system that is leaving them behind. I hope for the sake of my younger, trans sibling in highschool that these rules are not passed so they can have an equal and normal school experience such as cisgender students get to have.


I oppose the new trans and non-binary guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the new guidelines for the schools in Virginia because it will result in misery and possible suicides of children who perceive themselves as a different gender than on their birth certificate. In some situations informing their parents of their choices can also result in abuse at home. Let children explore their identity safely at school.


Trans rights are human rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Focus on what government should be doing and leave trans kids alone. </p>


I Oppose this guidance.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I’m a trans man still attending High School (New Kent High School). I am one of the lucky few to have supportive parents that will be there no matter what. But time and time again I see multiple other trans/queer students get outed (someone telling their parents about their sexuality or gender) or they come out to their unsupportive parents, and their home life gets unimaginably worse. It might be that the parents won’t financially support them any more, they might get kicked out on the streets, physically and verbally abused worse than they ever had before, children being attacked by the people who are supposed to protect them. I had a friend in middle school who attended a school in VA and they got outed to their incredibly abusive parents, they hated that their child was queer so much they moved down to Florida to isolate them. \n         And for the STAFF of an administration that is supposed to ensure the CHILDREN’S safety, you would be causing all of that hurt. All of the abuse. And all of the suicides that WILL happen if this is passed. Children will die. The state will be responsible. "}'>I’m a trans man still attending High School (New Kent High School). I am one of the lucky few to have supportive parents that will be there no matter what. But time and time again I see multiple other trans/queer students get outed (someone telling their parents about their sexuality or gender) or they come out to their unsupportive parents, and their home life gets unimaginably worse. It might be that the parents won’t financially support them any more, they might get kicked out on the streets, physically and verbally abused worse than they ever had before, children being attacked by the people who are supposed to protect them. I had a friend in middle school who attended a school in VA and they got outed to their incredibly abusive parents, they hated that their child was queer so much they moved down to Florida to isolate them.
And for the STAFF of an administration that is supposed to ensure the CHILDREN’S safety, you would be causing all of that hurt. All of the abuse. And all of the suicides that WILL happen if this is passed. Children will die. The state will be responsible.


Associate Professor, Christopher Newport University

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"The proposed changes to out trans and gender non-conforming students to their parents or guardians in public K-12 education in Virginia is unnecessarily exclusionary, shameful, and cruel. Home is not always a safe space for LGBTQ youth. If school is not a safe space, then we may not see these kids grow safely and healthy to adulthood. Please look at the widely publicly available data on family violence (physical, emotional, financial, spiritual, and more) by parents/guardians who do not accept their LGBTQ children. Moreover, the stigma that LGBTQ communities face daily is only worsened by this policy. The Commonwealth of Virginia should embrace differences, including gender expansiveness, as a benefit to, not a blemish on, our society."}'>The proposed changes to out trans and gender non-conforming students to their parents or guardians in public K-12 education in Virginia is unnecessarily exclusionary, shameful, and cruel. Home is not always a safe space for LGBTQ youth. If school is not a safe space, then we may not see these kids grow safely and healthy to adulthood. Please look at the widely publicly available data on family violence (physical, emotional, financial, spiritual, and more) by parents/guardians who do not accept their LGBTQ children. Moreover, the stigma that LGBTQ communities face daily is only worsened by this policy. The Commonwealth of Virginia should embrace differences, including gender expansiveness, as a benefit to, not a blemish on, our society.


I oppose this fully.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I want ALL of the students in our communities to feel welcome and safe in their schools. Stop standing in the way of progress.


Please, Actually Think of the Children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"The 2021 guidance is deeply flawed and coldly ignores REAL CHILDREN's needs, opting to adopt a regressive stance and discriminate against them. Trans and non-binary children deserve the same respect we give to any other children. It is downright evil to deny these children THEIR gender expression while allowing their hetero-normative classmates free gender expression. Any possible motivations for this guidance is based on PERCEIVED issues that are and would be rare, and are something intelligent guidance could address."}">The 2021 guidance is deeply flawed and coldly ignores REAL CHILDREN's needs, opting to adopt a regressive stance and discriminate against them. Trans and non-binary children deserve the same respect we give to any other children. It is downright evil to deny these children THEIR gender expression while allowing their hetero-normative classmates free gender expression. Any possible motivations for this guidance is based on PERCEIVED issues that are and would be rare, and are something intelligent guidance could address.


Religious rights to be kept tact

<!DOCTYPE html>

Unfortunately school has become a place of political war ground and has lost its focus and true purpose when it comes to teaching our children. It should never be a question that a person be allowed to peacefully maintain their right or freedom of religion. I disagree with the concept of forcing children and staff members to observe something that goes completely against their personal belief system (observing and identifying adverse pronouns according to one's gender at birth). I find it very appalling that in order to accommodate or uphold the rights of some you have to trample the rights of others. So to be clear, parents should still have a voice when it comes to how their children are educated especially when it comes to their upbringing and values concerning their children.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

We need laws that keep trans children safe, and include the endorsement of professionals who work with and care for trans students. We need laws that take into account the nuances and difficulties that trans kids face, and this isn’t it. This policy change could lead to serious endangerment physically and mentally for an already vulnerable group of individuals and needs to be rescinded.


Support Trans Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Simply put, trans rights are human rights and we should allow children to be their authentic selves. </p>


Support gov GY

<!DOCTYPE html>

A parent has a fundamental right to make decisions concerning the upbringing, education, and care of the parent's child.  School board members and teachers should focus on educating our children in the 5 core subjects so that they can can become successful in the future.


I am for parental rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

As indicated, I am for parental rights.  Parents know more about their children than anyone else and can better support their children in all ways.


Why y'all wanna be mean to queer kids - what is wrong with you?

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Love thy neighbor y'all. This stuff ain't right. Let them kids be. America is about freedom. </p>


Students

<!DOCTYPE html>

Students need help to find there own way. The government needs to stay out of their care.


Oppose


Youngkin student policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

NO to your proposal Youngkin. You know nothing about public schools. If this is so important put it on a public state ballot not try to insert it through the back door.


Strongly oppose - we need to support trans youth

<!DOCTYPE html>

We need to support trans youth. This change will have terrible effects. I strongly oppose it.


Strongly Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Strongly support implementing proposed policy.  The current policy was wrongly implemented and wrongly removed parents from parenting.  The current policy encourages dishonesty by students, schools and administrators by lying and intentionally keeping parents misinformed.  Implement ASAP.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I oppose this guidance. I am a concerned community member. Transgender and nonbinary youth are part of our future society, whether people support them or not. “Polling shows that 85% of transgender and nonbinary youth, and two-thirds of all LGBTQ youth, say that recent debates around anti-trans bills have negatively impacted their mental health.” We cannot have the mental health and well-being of these members of our society so severely stressed. Virginia must protect transgender and nonbinary students from bullying, harassment, and discrimination in schools and create inclusive and affirming learning environments. I want to be proud of Virginia, not embarrassed by prejudiced attitudes and appalling policies toward transgender and nonbinary students.\n"}'>I oppose this guidance. I am a concerned community member. Transgender and nonbinary youth are part of our future society, whether people support them or not. “Polling shows that 85% of transgender and nonbinary youth, and two-thirds of all LGBTQ youth, say that recent debates around anti-trans bills have negatively impacted their mental health.” We cannot have the mental health and well-being of these members of our society so severely stressed. Virginia must protect transgender and nonbinary students from bullying, harassment, and discrimination in schools and create inclusive and affirming learning environments. I want to be proud of Virginia, not embarrassed by prejudiced attitudes and appalling policies toward transgender and nonbinary students.


I fully support this policy protecting both the rights of parents and the well-being of children

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a concerned parent of three children, I fully support this policy restoring some sanity to the Virginia Department of Education’s gross overreach. The public school system is intended to facilitate alongside parents the education of children, not indoctrinate and separate children from their parents. Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from their parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment. Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, and students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Anyone who has gone through puberty/high school knows this is just common sense. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students. These new policies also protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students, as well as the primary role of parents in educating their children, the dignity of all children, while also ensuring appropriate support for those struggling with difficult questions or challenges during their formative years.


Opposed to Harmful AntiTrans Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a grandmother with two grandkids in VA public schools, I am deeply concerned about the proposed policy regarding transgender students. The policy is unnecessary, bigoted, and threatens the lives and well-being of youth. Students should be free to express their true identities in school.


This is the least Virginia can do

William Thibeau, The Heritage Foundation

<!DOCTYPE html>

Transvestitism is a scourge on society, and it has no place spreading anywhere in the public square, especially not our schools.

Gov Youngkin should go much further in banning this type of mental and physical "care" for students confused about their sex. No parent has a right to endorse sex confusion. Virginia schools should reflect a reality that there is man and woman, nothing else.

Gov Youngkin's policy does not go far enough, because it still falls under the false veneer of "parental rights". Public schools should teach virtue and truth to children, and make it clear transvestites are deeply troubled and ill-informed, and deserving of compassionate care.


This Policy Only Hurts Children

<!DOCTYPE html>

Not allowing children to express themselves, not allowing them to find where they fit into society as they grow, only harms them. Instead of raising children that can question things and think for themselves, these kinds of policies teach them to be quiet with who they are and what they feel, opening them up to abuse, bullying, suicide...

And in terms of the names, it's completely normal and healthy for children to want different names or go by a nickname. I knew kids all the time in school that wanted to be called something different and nobody took issue with it, teachers making note to correct it on their roster. But now that trans children want this same liberty that was previously given freely to other classmates, there is a problem.

Requiring legal documentation for this kind of thing is ridiculous. People shouldn't have to jump through these hoops.

And let me also point out how requiring parent's to be heavily involved in this only means to make children who are exploring themselves purposefully "out" their intentions, inviting abuse from parents and family who do not support LGBTQ+ rights.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Being a youth/teenager is soo hard!  Why would any adult in power make it that much harder by being so bigoted against a trans youth?  As an adult who knows several, they are just like your kids - they want to belong, have friends, finish school without extra stress.  There is more to fear from extremist groups like the Proud Boys than the 6 year old kid down the street who identifies as a boy....Please don't be so hateful"}">Being a youth/teenager is soo hard! Why would any adult in power make it that much harder by being so bigoted against a trans youth? As an adult who knows several, they are just like your kids - they want to belong, have friends, finish school without extra stress. There is more to fear from extremist groups like the Proud Boys than the 6 year old kid down the street who identifies as a boy....Please don't be so hateful


<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Trans and Non-Binary Students and all Youth of our State, Country and the world. Stop this Bigotry !!!


I oppose Youngkins student policy proposal.Live and let live. Do not judge others, treat others the way you would like to be treated. Share kindness and love. This policy points out differences, and advocates hate and disparity.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose Youngkins student policy proposal.
Live and let live. Do not judge others, treat others the way you would like to be treated. Share kindness and love. This policy points out differences, and advocates hate and disparity.


Full Support for Parental Rights

<!DOCTYPE html>

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


Just let our kids learn! I strongly oppose this policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Youngkin and the Board of Education have opted for a policy of prurience over learning: I OPPOSE this policy.  Youngkin has sexualized school, sports, restrooms, and all decisions about learning environments. These are children. The State should not be focused on genitals or sex and Youngkin should not sexualize the educational environment. It is this policy that does that! Not the kids themselves or their parents. As a parent, I want our children protected in school and do not want administrators considering their bathroom behavior, locker room presentation, or what is under their clothes. The kids do not need adults focused on this, they need adults focused on supporting their education. Let them learn in school and protect them all from guns, bullying, and violence. We need model policies which protect children and do not put them at greater risk; this one increases risk to all of our children and reduces parental rights. I strongly oppose this policy.


I OPPOSE the guidance


Enraged

<!DOCTYPE html>

My best friend's grandchild is non-binary. I am opposed to any form of legislation which requires a parent to be notified of a child's sexual identity or preference by an educator or any person acting in a support role including teachers, administration, clergy, or any other non parental person in contact with the child.


Very Opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

Gov Youngkin and admin are focusing on ideology and politics, rather than what is best for children. His policy is cruel, and not at all what pediatricians and teachers know to help all children learn safely.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the guidance. Our children spend more time at school than at home in most cases. Our schools should be a safe space.


Oppose the 2022 Model Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"As an educator in VA for 18 years, I totally oppose Gov. Younkin's 2022 Model Policy on the treatment of trans and non-binary youth in schools. This policy is harmful to the many trans and non-binary middle schoolers I teach on a daily basis. We need to protect these children from bullying and harrassment so that they can thrive in an inclusive learning enviroment for ALL students. Gov. Younkin's Model policy does just the opposite, and I strongly oppose."}">As an educator in VA for 18 years, I totally oppose Gov. Younkin's 2022 Model Policy on the treatment of trans and non-binary youth in schools. This policy is harmful to the many trans and non-binary middle schoolers I teach on a daily basis. We need to protect these children from bullying and harrassment so that they can thrive in an inclusive learning enviroment for ALL students. Gov. Younkin's Model policy does just the opposite, and I strongly oppose.


I OPPOSE the guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"As a mother to a teen trans daughter I strongly oppose this guidance. I'll admit I was completely lost and unaware of this until 2 years ago. Since then I have learned so much and hope others will do the same with concrete, truthful, and even statistical data. These kids are just that, kids. They are the same as their peers, with an extra layer of stress. What child, or person for that matter, would choose to add more stress and difficulty into their life? No one would. Take the time to educate yourself on this, imagine if it was your child, and realize that everyone deserves basic human rights in all facets of life. For many, public school is their safe haven. Don't take that away from anyone!"}">As a mother to a teen trans daughter I strongly oppose this guidance. I'll admit I was completely lost and unaware of this until 2 years ago. Since then I have learned so much and hope others will do the same with concrete, truthful, and even statistical data. These kids are just that, kids. They are the same as their peers, with an extra layer of stress. What child, or person for that matter, would choose to add more stress and difficulty into their life? No one would. Take the time to educate yourself on this, imagine if it was your child, and realize that everyone deserves basic human rights in all facets of life. For many, public school is their safe haven. Don't take that away from anyone!


I oppose this guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose this guidance. Our laws need to ensure our children’s safety, protection, and freedom to be who they are. Hate and discrimination does not belong in Virginia schools. LGBTQ+ students deserve the safety to thrive, no matter where they are.


Opposition to proposed anti-transgender policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the guidance! I wholeheartedly hope the VDOE will reject this policy.


I OPPOSE the guidance.


I oppose proposed new policies

As a citizen who votes and cares about our youth, I oppose the political attack on trangender children and adults. I am against stigmatization of these children, particularly as these policies will result in bullying. They put teachers and school administrators in a position that negates the support that trans gender school people need for their mental health. Stigmatizing any minority population is wrong!Trans people already encountered prejudice and self-worth issues before Gov. Yougking decided to single out these people. These policies are unjust and should not be implemented. Is America a just country with freedom and equality for all? Not if these anti-children policies are enacted.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"As a citizen who votes and cares about our youth, I oppose the political attack on trangender children and adults. I am against stigmatization of these children, particularly as these policies will result in bullying. They put teachers and school administrators in a position that negates the support that trans gender school people need for their mental health. Stigmatizing any minority population is wrong!\nTrans people already encountered prejudice and self-worth issues before Gov. Yougking decided to single out these people. These policies are unjust and should not be implemented. \nIs America a just country with freedom and equality for all? Not if these anti-children policies are enacted. "}'>As a citizen who votes and cares about our youth, I oppose the political attack on trangender children and adults. I am against stigmatization of these children, particularly as these policies will result in bullying. They put teachers and school administrators in a position that negates the support that trans gender school people need for their mental health. Stigmatizing any minority population is wrong!
Trans people already encountered prejudice and self-worth issues before Gov. Yougking decided to single out these people. These policies are unjust and should not be implemented.
Is America a just country with freedom and equality for all? Not if these anti-children policies are enacted.


Thoughts from a Virginia Student

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a student from Virginia, I strongly support Youngkin's 2022 Model.  For the sake of making an educated judgment on the topic, I read both the 2021 and 2022 models thoroughly, and I believe that the implementation of the 2022 Model is both necessary and just.  It affirms the dignity and humanity of trans students, stands against bullying, and provides accommodations for my trans peers while also affirming the fundamental, Constitutional right to religious freedom.  I believe that trans students are equally deserving of love and respect, which Youngkin affirms; the model states that "Every effort should be made to ensure that a transgender student wishing to change his or her means of address is treated with respect, compassion, and dignity in the classroom and school environment." However, it is entirely possible to ensure respect and compassion without forcing one's own personal ideological beliefs on others.  Freedom of religion and personal belief needs to be protected; neither the schools nor the government has a right to dictate truth.

Furthermore, I do believe that it is absolutely vital that parents are involved and informed in their children's educations. Schools should not be going behind parent's backs, nor are public school teachers in any way, shape, or form trained counselors.  Additionally, the model provides for the situation that a trans student feels that he/she is at risk if their parents were to know: “[i]f the student has indicated that the reason for being at imminent risk of suicide relates to parental abuse or neglect, this contact shall not be made with the parent. Instead, the person shall, as soon as practicable, notify the local department of social services of the county or city wherein the child resides or wherein the abuse or neglect is believed to have occurred or the state Department of Social Services’ toll-free child abuse and neglect hotline, as required by § 63.2- 1509.”  Thus, unless a student him/herself feels that they are at risk if their parents know, the parents should be informed.

Last, I believe that in addition to providing for the safety and education of trans students, the school needs to be aware of the needs of all of its students.  In particular, previous policies granting trans access to any bathroom or locker room completely invades the privacy of young girls/women in schools.  They should not be forced to change in front of a biological male or share such a private space with them.  Accommodations can be made for trans students that identify with the opposite gender without completely disregarding the feelings and safety of other students.  All students deserve to feel safe, and it is perverted to try to tell students, many of whom are minors, that they should not feel uncomfortable and that they need to put up with something that invades their privacy for the sake of "inclusion".   Again, it is possible to have accommodations for trans students that do not violate the rights and privacy of other students.

In conclusion, I am extremely relieved to hear that Virginia is finally stepping up to protect us students and our rights, and I strongly support this policy.


Completely support Governor Youngkin on this one.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Who has primary responsibility for a child's well-being, the state or the parent(s)? The answer is the latter, and no civil authority should be acknowledged that seeks to usurp a parent's role as the primary caregiver, and authority, over a minor child.  Governor Youngkin's Administration understands this and should be commended for ensuring parental primacy when it comes to the raising of children.


Boys sports should be open to all

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a man I have yet to meet anyone who opposes teams that are traditionally “boys teams” being open to everyone, regardless of sex.

i recognize some individuals dont like the idea of trans women getting to compete with non-trans (“Cis”) women, as they feel that it isnt a “level playing field”


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I urge the VDOE to reject this policy. I strongly oppose this guidance for many reasons, but most importantly, the proposed policy would actively harm students who are already at a disadvantage for ridicule and discrimination. Requiring, or even making it optional for teachers to out students and report to parents information that the student may be transgender is problematic because it opens the student to abuse at home based on extremely personal information. Not to mention there is no way that teachers or ANYONE other than the individual themself can be certain about what exactly they are reporting, what that means to the student, and have no idea the impacts this may have on the student. Children and teenagers are naturally questioning their identities - this is what adolescence is for. Whether this is gender, career aspirations, hobbies and interests, whatever it may be...we all have a right and responsibility to question who we are and reflect on our true selves and how to best express that and live authentically. Most importantly, everyone has a right to privacy. The home lives of students are private to teachers by default and the same respect is deserved in the reverse. Interfering with this important life stage of introspection and exploration may have lifelong impacts no matter the subject. Transgender people are already fighting an uphill battle with themselves and deserve the space and privacy to make peace with themselves on their own terms and share that information when and if they feel comfortable. School may be the only place that many students can practice their independence and learn to be their own person and it is dangerous to suggest that teachers act as surveillants. These policies propose an extreme opportunity for UNNECESSARY harm to students and the possibility of fracturing family relationships forever. It is no one's business outside the family to introduce these conversations before a student is ready, and there is so much possibility that adults could totally misinterpret and cause harm based on rumors or overheard conversations. This policy would set a dangerous precedent for a surveillance state. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I urge you to consider the larger implications not only for children but adults and our entire population. Whatever happened to live and let live? Both students AND teachers are already dealing with incredible challenges just doing their job. Why introduce politics to what is supposed to be a learning institution? This would negatively impact not only the home lives but the ability for students to feel safe and LEARN at school for both transgender students and students as a whole! This is adding yet another thing on a teacher's job description that is unnecessary and overworking them emotionally, adding a whole new element of burnout and stress. Regardless of your personal opinion on this \"issue\", this is asking too much. Let's not make the school environment adversarial. Let's not make it about policing and bring teachers into the rumor mill. Kids are cruel enough to each other. Let's give them a chance to be kids and live out their adolescent years with the freedom we all yearn for. Let kids be kids."}">I urge the VDOE to reject this policy. I strongly oppose this guidance for many reasons, but most importantly, the proposed policy would actively harm students who are already at a disadvantage for ridicule and discrimination. Requiring, or even making it optional for teachers to out students and report to parents information that the student may be transgender is problematic because it opens the student to abuse at home based on extremely personal information. Not to mention there is no way that teachers or ANYONE other than the individual themself can be certain about what exactly they are reporting, what that means to the student, and have no idea the impacts this may have on the student. Children and teenagers are naturally questioning their identities - this is what adolescence is for. Whether this is gender, career aspirations, hobbies and interests, whatever it may be...we all have a right and responsibility to question who we are and reflect on our true selves and how to best express that and live authentically. Most importantly, everyone has a right to privacy. The home lives of students are private to teachers by default and the same respect is deserved in the reverse. Interfering with this important life stage of introspection and exploration may have lifelong impacts no matter the subject. Transgender people are already fighting an uphill battle with themselves and deserve the space and privacy to make peace with themselves on their own terms and share that information when and if they feel comfortable. School may be the only place that many students can practice their independence and learn to be their own person and it is dangerous to suggest that teachers act as surveillants. These policies propose an extreme opportunity for UNNECESSARY harm to students and the possibility of fracturing family relationships forever. It is no one's business outside the family to introduce these conversations before a student is ready, and there is so much possibility that adults could totally misinterpret and cause harm based on rumors or overheard conversations. This policy would set a dangerous precedent for a surveillance state. I sound like a conspiracy nut but I urge you to consider the larger implications not only for children but adults and our entire population. Whatever happened to live and let live? Both students AND teachers are already dealing with incredible challenges just doing their job. Why introduce politics to what is supposed to be a learning institution? This would negatively impact not only the home lives but the ability for students to feel safe and LEARN at school for both transgender students and students as a whole! This is adding yet another thing on a teacher's job description that is unnecessary and overworking them emotionally, adding a whole new element of burnout and stress. Regardless of your personal opinion on this "issue", this is asking too much. Let's not make the school environment adversarial. Let's not make it about policing and bring teachers into the rumor mill. Kids are cruel enough to each other. Let's give them a chance to be kids and live out their adolescent years with the freedom we all yearn for. Let kids be kids.


Strong Support for this policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

My wife and I strongly support the governor’s position to reverse the 2021 policy.


I approve!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents have the responsibility  of caring for their children until they are 18. They should also have the right to be apart of any decisions they are making concerning school.