Vehemently Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Parents do have rights.  But we do not allow parents the right to harm their children.  We do not allow for corporal punishment--we do not give parents that right.  We recognize that parents can mentally abuse their children as well but we do not consider that the right of a parent.  That's why we have child protective services.  In the same way, these so called parental rights will result in harm to our transgender and nonbinary youth, increasing axiety, stress, reducing self-worth, and even an increase in suicide rates.  How can we as a state discuss the need for Social Emotional Learning (SEL) when we completely ignore the basic rights of our children to be safe and to be treated with respect.  How do we completely ignore their mental health?

I completely oppose these model policies presented by Governor Youngkin.  I want schools to be a safe place for our children and students at all time.  Sometimes this is the only safe place for our youth.  Let's not take that away from them.


I support the 2022 Model Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

It is important, at all times, to treat all children with kindness and respect, to involve their parents in all aspects of their lives, and to ensure their safety at school.  The 2021 model policy has weakness that have been rectified by the 2022 policy.

The 2021 model policy (p. 14) requires school personnel to be actively involved in deceiving parents if the child is not comfortable discussing their gender dysphoria with their parents.  Staff members are required to do this by using birth name and pronouns when contacting parents while at the same time using the transgender name and pronouns at school.  However, parents are in the best position to help their own child, and it is not ethical for the schools to usurp parental rights, nor is it right to ask school personnel to violate their conscience by being actively involved in deceiving parents.

The 2021 model policy states that gender identity is "an innate characteristic that most children declare by age five to six" (p. 8) This is ideology, not science, and has been removed in the 2022 model policy.

The 2021 model policy allows students to use restrooms and other facilities according to their gender identity.  Recent cases of sexual assault demonstrate that this is not safe.  The 2022 model policy rectifies this problem.


All students should feel safe in school

Many people have commented and shared data and opinions. One thing I think we all can agree upon is that the safety of all students is important. No child should feel afraid at school. Students should be able to speak with trusted adults at school if/when they are afraid or feel unsafe. Teachers can make all kids feel valued by addressing them respectfully and can easily avoid using a pronoun when speaking with students. Another issue discussed is restrooms. Obviously, the bathrooms at home are coed and using technology to monitor who enters and exits restrooms at school is not a heavy lift. In fact, many schools already have a monitoring system in place that doesn't invade privacy.Another area in school buildings that has been identified as a place where safety can be an issue is locker rooms. We learned during COVID that closing the locker rooms decreased the number of referrals to the office for fights, bullying, and theft. I believe we should step back and make “dressing out” for Health and PE (HPE) optional in all schools. Athleisure clothing is worn to school more often these days and the kids can simply change their t-shirt after HPE if they sweat during class. This guideline has is in place in many school divisions after COVID guidelines were relaxed but not everywhere. I think we should re-examine why we moved backward to doing "what we always have always done". Participation has increased in HPE with student choice and more instructional time has been the result. Many HPE classes begin with a check-in and include topics related to safety, stress, kindness, and communication, to name a few. HPE is a course where the teachers include goal setting and the components of the Profile of a Virginia Graduate daily. These are important skills for all students.As far as the inclusion of transgender students in athletics is concerned, the Virginia High School League abides by state policy that aligns with the NCAA.I obviously don’t have all the answers, but I do think it’s time we focused on what is best for all students. We do not need to sort and put kids in boxes. One size does not fit all, as I think we can all agree. Sometimes, we adults create barriers where barriers don’t need to be.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Many people have commented and shared data and opinions. One thing I think we all can agree upon is that the safety of all students is important. No child should feel afraid at school. Students should be able to speak with trusted adults at school if/when they are afraid or feel unsafe. Teachers can make all kids feel valued by addressing them respectfully and can easily avoid using a pronoun when speaking with students. Another issue discussed is restrooms. Obviously, the bathrooms at home are coed and using technology to monitor who enters and exits restrooms at school is not a heavy lift. In fact, many schools already have a monitoring system in place that doesn't invade privacy.

Another area in school buildings that has been identified as a place where safety can be an issue is locker rooms. We learned during COVID that closing the locker rooms decreased the number of referrals to the office for fights, bullying, and theft. I believe we should step back and make “dressing out” for Health and PE (HPE) optional in all schools. Athleisure clothing is worn to school more often these days and the kids can simply change their t-shirt after HPE if they sweat during class. This guideline has is in place in many school divisions after COVID guidelines were relaxed but not everywhere. I think we should re-examine why we moved backward to doing "what we always have always done". Participation has increased in HPE with student choice and more instructional time has been the result. Many HPE classes begin with a check-in and include topics related to safety, stress, kindness, and communication, to name a few. HPE is a course where the teachers include goal setting and the components of the Profile of a Virginia Graduate daily. These are important skills for all students.

As far as the inclusion of transgender students in athletics is concerned, the Virginia High School League abides by state policy that aligns with the NCAA.

I obviously don’t have all the answers, but I do think it’s time we focused on what is best for all students. We do not need to sort and put kids in boxes. One size does not fit all, as I think we can all agree. Sometimes, we adults create barriers where barriers don’t need to be.


Support Youngkin's policies involving children and their parents

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin's policies.  Parents should be informed and have the major say in how their children are treated.


Trans students deserve equal access to education

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy directly harms trans students and stands in the way to equal educational opportunities for all students. Our schools should be inclusive and just to foster a safe learning environment for all. This policy is abhorrent and makes schools less safe.


Support Parental Rights.

I am in favor of new pro-parent policies in public schools - and all schools. The parents know best what is good for their child/children.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<h4> I am in favor of new pro-parent policies in public schools - and all schools. <br/>The parents know best what is good for their child/children. </h4>


I support the new pro-parent recommendations

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support the model policies in the 2022 policy recommendation.  I believe parents, not the schools, should be directing students’ values. I also agree that teachers and staff should not have to have their speech compelled or jobs threatened by the whims of a confused adolescent.  Reading this proposal was a breath of fresh air. I am a rare creature these days: a conservative licensed mental health therapist. Kids need adults to provide structure and not be able to intimidate adults, that is the tail wagging the dog. There are also many students who just want to go to school and learn, and are tired of all these distractions regarding one’s gender and sexual orientation. School should be about teaching math, science, history, art, music, etc. not an enforcer of progressive mob mentality. Way to go Youngkin!  You’re making me glad I voted for you.  </p>


Restore the March 2021 Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

My wife and I have both lived in Virginia for nearly fifty years. We sent both of our sons to Virginia public schools and never experienced a situation where a small subset of students were targeted for political advantage. The Model Policies for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools published by Youngkin administration are a step backwards into the 19th century. They should be scuttled and the Model Policies published in March 2021 should be left in place.

I have particular concerns with the discussion of the First Amendment, the definitions, the process, and the political games that have brought us to this point.

First Amendment:Section V.c. Development is indefensible nonsense.

These 2022 Model Policies adhere to the First Amendment. The First Amendment forbids government actors to require individuals to adhere to or adopt any particular ideological beliefs. Practices such as compelling others to use preferred pronouns is premised on the ideological belief that gender is a matter of personal choice or subjective experience, not sex. Many Virginians reject this belief. Additionally, the First Amendment guarantees religious freedom and prohibits compelling others to affirm ideas that may be contrary to their personal religious beliefs.

This paragraph is fundamentally confused about First Amendment freedoms, suggesting that freedom of belief overrides the legitimate constraints on teachers expressing personal and religious views in a classroom. Referring to beliefs on sex and gender, the Model Policy observes:“Many Virginians reject this belief.”

The First Amendment protects your right to hold beliefs, or reject them. That doesn’t translate into a First Amendment right to teach in public schools while expressing those beliefs. Many Virginians may also still be racists, and may still find religious support in the Bible for their beliefs. See Donald Trump, the Bible, and White Supremacy | Harvard Divinity School (HDS)  But the First Amendment does not authorize those teachers to advocate White Supremacy in their classroom. In a related matter, they may have religious beliefs about the circumstances surrounding creation, but they should be required to affirm that the universe is billions of years old if they want to teach science.

Another matter. Let's take a moment to consider the constraints on Free Expression here: “Compelling others to use preferred pronouns.” Why should religious freedom supersede ordinary courtesy in a classroom? Religious folks are becoming desperate in their search for ways to characterize themselves as victims when they are actually perps.

In summary, the 2022 Model Policies, unlike their predecessor, do NOT adhere to the First Amendment.

Definitions: The definitions are a malevolent muddle.

-”The phrase “transgender student” shall mean a public school student whose parent has requested in writing, due to their child’s persistent and sincere belief that his or her gender differs with his or her sex, that their child be so identified while at school.”

The definition is inaccurate. Parental permission in writing does not create a transgender student where one did not previously exist. A persistent and sincere belief is not a prerequisite and need not be demonstrated to any public official.

Is “biological sex” a euphemism for sex at birth? The definition creates and then leaves unresolved the question of when and whether “biological sex” has been transformed by medical procedures. The definition introduces political considerations  into decisions should be medical.

(For that matter, the 2022 Model policy is a model of careless drafting. There are four definitions: two include “shall mean”s, another “means”, and another “is”.)

These definitions implement an indefensible policy through confusing and inaccurate definitions.The section on terminology in the March 2021 Policy is clearer, more complete, more useful and better reflects the complexities involved in the use of language. It should be restored.

Process: The process for developing these guidelines has been confusing, ambiguous or worse. The information provided in the Virginia Town Hall could be interpreted to mean that the March 2021 policy has already been rescinded. The Virginia Town Hall indicates that the planned effective date for the proposed Model Policies is October 27th, the day after the comment period closes. Over sixty thousand comments have been provided so far, but there is no discussion of how these comments will be considered, or for how long the newly effective Model guidelines will remain in place before they are superseded after another round of revisions that reflect the current round of public input. Plenty of confusion and uncertainty for the School Districts that will be considering implementation of the 2022 Model policy, particularly because it appeared after the school year had already started.

Political Bias: Bias against transgender students is not a job requirement for Republican governors or administrations. Consider the following from Spencer Cox, Governor of Utah, on the occasion of his veto of a bill of a bill banning transgender students from sports:

Four kids and only one of them playing girls sports. That’s what all of this is about. Four kids who aren’t dominating or winning trophies or taking scholarships. Four kids who are just trying to find some friends and feel like they are a part of something. Four kids trying to get through each day. Rarely has so much fear and anger been directed at so few. I don’t understand what they are going through or why they feel the way they do. But I want them to live. And all the research shows that even a little acceptance and connection can reduce suicidality significantly. For that reason, as much as any other, I have taken this action in the hope that we can continue to work together and find a better way. If a veto override occurs, I hope we can work to find ways to show these four kids that we love them and they have a place in our state. https://www.washingtonpost.com/lifestyle/2022/03/23/utah-cox-transgender-athlete-veto/

Maybe gratuitous cruelty has become a job requirement for Republican presidential aspirants. Our current Governor can best become Trump lite, or DeSantis lite, since Youngkin does not have a pliant legislature like Florida. The Model Policy is still a disgraceful display of cruelty and cynicism. Virginians know what Youngkin is like; the rest of the country will find out in due course.

Perhaps policies like this one will “fire up the base.” Perhaps they will appeal to under- informed middle-of-the-roaders who are indifferent to the cruelties deployed against transgender students, and think that controversies will go away if only transgender students go back into the closet, or their assigned restrooms, as the case may be. It’s more likely that policies like this one will strengthen the opposition, encouraging people to educate themselves on manufactured controversies and join in the defense of transgender students.

Thank you

John Cross

Burke VA


I support GOV Youngkin policy change

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Gov Youngkin policy

restore parental rights and protection the First Amendment rights of students and staff.

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


I support Gov Youngkins educational proposal.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p style="text-align: left;">I support Governor Youngkin's educational proposal Code of Virginia { 22.1-23.3 </p>


Trans kids in VA

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Please keep trans kids safe in school and everywhere </p>


transgender policy


oppose this assault on trans kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>trans kids need support not this sanctimonious assault. It’s challenging enough to live in a body that does not reflect your gender, but to have the government censor your ability to get support is horrible. Transgender and non-binary people are more likely to internalize their feelings when they fear reactions from adults. We don’t need more suicidal teens or more homophobic murderers feeling justified and supported by our government. Stop this assault on civil rights.  </p>


OPPOSE


Please keep trans kids safe.

<!DOCTYPE html>

Please keep trans kids safe


SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support the policy! I </p>


oppose this new policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

Students must feel accepted and understood in school in order to learn. I believe this policy would interfere with the feelings of safety and acceptance. Students must feel that the teachers and administration of their school support them.


Transgender Student Policies in VA Schools

As a parent with children in VA public schools I fully support policies that protect all students and parents' rights to determine their children's values and beliefs. These include:

Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs: Parents have the right to instill in and nurture values and beliefs for their own children and make decisions concerning their children’s education and upbringing in accordance with their customs, faith, and family culture.
Schools shall defer to parents to make the best decisions with respect to their children: Parents are in the best position to work with their children and, where appropriate, their children’s health care providers to determine (a) what names, nicknames, and/or pronouns, if any, shall be used for their child by teachers and school staff while their child is at school, (b) whether their child engages in any counseling or social transition at school that encourages a gender that differs from their child’s sex, or (c) whether their child expresses a gender that differs with their child’s sex while at school.
Schools shall keep parents informed about their children’s well-being: To ensure parents are able to make the best decisions with respect to their child, school personnel shall keep parents fully informed about all matters that may bereasonably expected to be important to a parent, including, and without limitation, matters related to their child’s health, and social and psychological development.

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a parent with children in VA public schools I fully support policies that protect all students and parents' rights to determine their children's values and beliefs. These include:

Schools shall respect parents’ values and beliefs: Parents have the right to instill in and nurture values and beliefs for their own children and make decisions concerning their children’s education and upbringing in accordance with their customs, faith, and family culture.

Schools shall defer to parents to make the best decisions with respect to their children: Parents are in the best position to work with their children and, where appropriate, their children’s health care providers to determine (a) what names, nicknames, and/or pronouns, if any, shall be used for their child by teachers and school staff while their child is at school, (b) whether their child engages in any counseling or social transition at school that encourages a gender that differs from their child’s sex, or (c) whether their child expresses a gender that differs with their child’s sex while at school.

Schools shall keep parents informed about their children’s well-being: To ensure parents are able to make the best decisions with respect to their child, school personnel shall keep parents fully informed about all matters that may be
reasonably expected to be important to a parent, including, and without limitation, matters related to their child’s health, and social and psychological development.


Outrageous policy wrapped up in a lot of pretty words!

<!DOCTYPE html>

When I read the following words: "unique individual", "free from discrimination, harassment, bullying", "supports efforts to protect and encourage respect for all students", and "necessary compassion and respect", I wondered how these same words ended up in a Guidance Document intended to discriminate against, harass and bully - and show NO compassion or respect for - trans students. That's some real fancy footwork!

Not unlike Glenn Younkin's portrayal of himself from day one, this appears to be a big wolf dressed up in sheep's clothing. Our trans students deserve better, and I am VERY opposed to this policy.


Transgender kids

<!DOCTYPE html>

Transgender children deserve our support, understanding, and compassion. It is our duty as adults to offer them kindness and non-judgment, and to facilitate their  well-considered choices.


ONE PERSON WRITING OPPOSE 1000 TIMES WONT GET YOU A PASS TO THE LITTLE GIRL'S ROOM

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Hahaha nice try. </p>


Protect transgender students

<!DOCTYPE html>

To protect the rights, safety, and dignity of transgender students, please oppose this policy. Transgender people, especially youth, that are not allowed to live their lives as their true authentic selves suffer higher rates of depression. Parents that oppose their child’s gender or sexual identity may truly believe they are acting out of love, but the truth is that their child will be unhappy because they are not being loved and supported for who they are. Our schools should do their part to support students who are not supported or feel safe being out at home by addressing them by their chosen names and pronouns.


Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

Let parents maintain rights to provide guidance to their children.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the guidance. This will be harmful to so many


Trangender Policy of Gov. Younkin

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Strongly support Gov Youngkin's Revised Transgender Policy.  It protects parents and all students.  </p>


This is outrageous!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I do not agree with this bill being passed one bit. It is very unsafe for the students in the lgbtq community to be outed and then have to face abuse at home. Transgender and non-binary students have a higher rate of suicide and homelessness than other students. Please take this into consideration.


I support Youngkin's policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Children need parental care, not government intrusion. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

The proposed transphobic model policies support bullying and intimidation.  The proposed policy promotes a toxic educational environment that will result in negative learning outcomes for all students.


Oppose the proposed model policy for the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Scho

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the proposed Model Policy on  the Treatment of Transgender Students in Virginia’s Public Schools. I believe it would violate the Virginia Human Rights Act, as amended, Tile IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 and the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

I urge the Board to engage in a searching consultation with input from an advisory committee of school-based personnel representing diverse Superintendent’s Regions and disciplines, representatives from state professional associations, local businesses, advocacy organizations, parents, students, and specialists from the Virginia Department of Education, as was done before adoption of the 2021 policy.

David A. Drachsler

Alexandria

Former Vice Chair, Virginia Council on Human Rights


Draft Policy Goes Too Far -- opposed

<!DOCTYPE html>

To treat each child with dignity means accommodating the preference of their name and sexual identity.  There is no harm to another student if a transgender child is able to choose a different name and is referred to with that name, particularly if the transgender child's parent has provided written consent.  Requiring a legal document with the name change is too burdensome.

The policy should not prevent a school from making accommodations if it wishes.  Currently draft language says, "shall provide reasonable modifications to this policy only to the extent required by federal law."  Why take the freedom away from the school to make those decisions?

Sports and extracurricular events should not be off limits for the transgender child particularly before scholarship or other competitive advantages come into play.  At the elementary and middle school level, there is no tangible harm for a transgender youth to outperform a cisgender youth.  The previous policy referred athletic participation to the athletic agency's rules.

This draft policy takes freedoms away from the most vulnerable in our population to favor the most established and privileged in our society.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I adamantly oppose this ruling. These children deserve much better than this.


SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of students, parents and personnel. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the guidance regarding trans and non-binary students. All of the students in our schools deserve to be safe and to be respected.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I'm a mother, a Christian, a voter, and a cisgender ally to trans & non-binary (enby) people. I have two children who will start school in the next few years-- I want their future friends, teammates and maybe even they themselves to have the same right to be embraced in their educational setting (and all other parts of their lives). Trans youth deserve a rich and full childhood supported by adults... dangerous legislation that singles them out is designed to stunt their growth and will limit their options and self-worth later in life. My life is richer in community with trans and enby leaders. I have served/taken communion alongside trans and enby adults. I have reported to trans adults who served on a board of directors. I've exercised with trans and enby folks. Virginia has a bright future, but only if we let trans and enby children grow to their full potential in community with cisgender children, and train educators and policy makers to understand that all children are our state's future."}">I'm a mother, a Christian, a voter, and a cisgender ally to trans & non-binary (enby) people. I have two children who will start school in the next few years-- I want their future friends, teammates and maybe even they themselves to have the same right to be embraced in their educational setting (and all other parts of their lives). Trans youth deserve a rich and full childhood supported by adults... dangerous legislation that singles them out is designed to stunt their growth and will limit their options and self-worth later in life. My life is richer in community with trans and enby leaders. I have served/taken communion alongside trans and enby adults. I have reported to trans adults who served on a board of directors. I've exercised with trans and enby folks. Virginia has a bright future, but only if we let trans and enby children grow to their full potential in community with cisgender children, and train educators and policy makers to understand that all children are our state's future.


I OPPOSE GOV YOUNGKINS POLICY STUDENT POLICY

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is discriminatory. It is not in keeping with the protection of minority rights or the equality content of the US Constitution. It is also cruel and uncaring clearly being done for political purposes. It achieves no other goal.


Support the care for children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Parents play a vital role in their child's upbringing.  Allow them to continue to guide them with the new policies proposed by Youngkin's administration. </p>


Protect LGBTQ teens

I OPPOSE the VDOE policy changes. I support trans and LGBT youth, their rights, their privacy, and their mental health. As a mental health professional in the Richmond area, I work with many trans, non-binary, and LGBT youth and adults. I implore VDOE to protect such a vulnerable population. 45% of LGBT youth consider suicide each year. 37% of trans and non-binary youth have been physically threatened or harmed due to their gender identity. Having a school and community that supports and protects their gender identity can significantly reduce these statistics. Please take the time to read about these statistics, among many others, from the Trevor Project here: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/Please don't stifle the hard work we are doing in the mental health field to make sure these kids live to adulthood. These kids need their community's support, including that of their teachers, school systems, and VDOE.Thank you,Lauren Connelly, PMHNP-BCRichmond Creative Counseling

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I OPPOSE the VDOE policy changes.  I support trans and LGBT youth, their rights, their privacy, and their mental health.  As a mental health professional in the Richmond area, I work with many trans, non-binary, and LGBT youth and adults.  I implore VDOE to protect such a vulnerable population.  45% of LGBT youth consider suicide each year.  37% of trans and non-binary youth have been physically threatened or harmed due to their gender identity.  Having a school and community that supports and protects their gender identity can significantly reduce these statistics.  \nPlease take the time to read about these statistics, among many others, from the Trevor Project here: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/\nPlease don't stifle the hard work we are doing in the mental health field to make sure these kids live to adulthood.  These kids need their community's support, including that of their teachers, school systems, and VDOE.\nThank you,\nLauren Connelly, PMHNP-BC\nRichmond Creative Counseling "}">I OPPOSE the VDOE policy changes. I support trans and LGBT youth, their rights, their privacy, and their mental health. As a mental health professional in the Richmond area, I work with many trans, non-binary, and LGBT youth and adults. I implore VDOE to protect such a vulnerable population. 45% of LGBT youth consider suicide each year. 37% of trans and non-binary youth have been physically threatened or harmed due to their gender identity. Having a school and community that supports and protects their gender identity can significantly reduce these statistics.
Please take the time to read about these statistics, among many others, from the Trevor Project here: https://www.thetrevorproject.org/survey-2022/
Please don't stifle the hard work we are doing in the mental health field to make sure these kids live to adulthood. These kids need their community's support, including that of their teachers, school systems, and VDOE.
Thank you,
Lauren Connelly, PMHNP-BC
Richmond Creative Counseling


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the guidance and the cruelty.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I am strongly opposed to this policy!! This is going to harm vulnerable children and not just trans kids this will hurt everyone who doesn't fit in a box!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"As a parent of two former public school children in Virginia Beach, I am shocked at the lengths Republicans will go to when trying to win elections and run the government. Teachers, along with parents, can handle most situations beautifully, as long as adults do not use it as an excuse to bully or bring their religious beliefs into a secular classroom. Parents have always had the right to remove a child from a class or lesson plan. If they object to reading material, they’ve always been able to opt out. Teachers have enough work to do. They want to resolve situations quickly and for the benefit of everyone, most importantly, the child. I’m not sure where all this “ parents get no say “ came from. They’ve always had the right to speak up and make the final decisions for their children. This is all made up to cause fear in parents and get voted for those with no other agenda. I’m devastated at what’s happening in my state in such a short period since the election. The current Governor is using our state to set up a campaign run for the presidency. This is not what’s best for Virginia. Please protect all students. And please protect the most vulnerable of them."}'>As a parent of two former public school children in Virginia Beach, I am shocked at the lengths Republicans will go to when trying to win elections and run the government. Teachers, along with parents, can handle most situations beautifully, as long as adults do not use it as an excuse to bully or bring their religious beliefs into a secular classroom. Parents have always had the right to remove a child from a class or lesson plan. If they object to reading material, they’ve always been able to opt out. Teachers have enough work to do. They want to resolve situations quickly and for the benefit of everyone, most importantly, the child. I’m not sure where all this “ parents get no say “ came from. They’ve always had the right to speak up and make the final decisions for their children. This is all made up to cause fear in parents and get voted for those with no other agenda. I’m devastated at what’s happening in my state in such a short period since the election. The current Governor is using our state to set up a campaign run for the presidency. This is not what’s best for Virginia. Please protect all students. And please protect the most vulnerable of them.


Strongly SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

Respect all students and parents by upholding parents' God-given and constitutional right to guide their child's development.


Trans gender children

<!DOCTYPE html>

This is not a parental right.  It is cruelty to children.  We all know Mr. Youngkin is already running for president and this is one way to get votes.  Shame on him.


Protect our trans children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Please do not pass this.  I've been so proud to live in a state like VA where we have worked tirelessly to protect our trans children. In addition, we have worked award to co-exist, love, and protect everyone regardless of gender, color, religion.  Let's be role models for other states to live up to.  Again, please do not pass this atrocious law that will take us back a step."}">Please do not pass this. I've been so proud to live in a state like VA where we have worked tirelessly to protect our trans children. In addition, we have worked award to co-exist, love, and protect everyone regardless of gender, color, religion. Let's be role models for other states to live up to. Again, please do not pass this atrocious law that will take us back a step.


SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

Firmly support this document. If we are going to strip parents of all rights and responsibilities, we should be prepared to lower the minor/adult threshold age. Let them smoke at 8. Drink at 9. Drive at 10. When does it stop? This is much more of a school and governmental overreach issue than a trans rights issue. To all of those parents that oppose this policy, what happens when the issue isn't something you support? Your rights as parents are gone. Also, any comments made here by anyone under 18 are irrelevant, sadly.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"This proposed guidance is inappropriate and disgusting. This is an intentional effort to institute religion and bigotry into Virginia schools. Trans youth need resources, care, and to be included just as another other student. Should Virginia school districts decide to utilize this heinous agenda, students will suffer and some will die. Yes, this can and likely will cause trans youth to kill themselves. Trans individuals are already at an astronomically greater risk of suicide due to exclusive, bigoted laws and discrimination. It's 2022. Virginia is better than this."}">This proposed guidance is inappropriate and disgusting. This is an intentional effort to institute religion and bigotry into Virginia schools. Trans youth need resources, care, and to be included just as another other student. Should Virginia school districts decide to utilize this heinous agenda, students will suffer and some will die. Yes, this can and likely will cause trans youth to kill themselves. Trans individuals are already at an astronomically greater risk of suicide due to exclusive, bigoted laws and discrimination. It's 2022. Virginia is better than this.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a teacher, I strongly oppose the model policy because it is disrespectful and exclusionary. It does not provide the best circumstances for ALL students to learn.


Strongly oppose this policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy is discrimination to so many of our youth, and honestly downright cruel.


I 100% support these new regualtions by Govenor Youngkin

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support the many positive reforms made by the new policies. Parents have every right to guide their child's development. The new policies also protect the First Amendment rights of students and staff.

The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities.

Parents know their children’s needs better than anyone. If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents. Under the new policies, school officials must keep parents fully informed, and require schools to enforce laws, regulations and policies that prohibit and deter bullying or harassment.

Student participation in sex-specific athletics, school activities and events should be determined by sex, e.g., for overnight travel accommodations and locker rooms.

Students should use the bathrooms that correspond to their sex. Single-user bathrooms and facilities should be made available in accessible areas and provided with appropriate signage, indicating accessibility for all students.

The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of personnel and students.


No

<!DOCTYPE html>

Kids should be able to express themselves. By not starting at a younger age for them to be who they want to be then they will always feel oppressed by society and not welcomed by all. Let the kids be happy and be whoever they want to be.


SUPPORT

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Children need their parents to help them with needed guidance.  School officials must keep parents fully informed and require schools to enforce laws that prohibit harassment. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans children must be protected.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the guidance. It runs against the evidence and trades off the welfare and well-being of students for political gain.


Trans kids deserve our support

<!DOCTYPE html>

You are no expert. You are not a Healthcare professional,  social worker nor educator. Stay focused on what you know and keep our economy going. We don't need more hate and discrimination in Virginia


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I knew I was trans when I was a teenager in the 1980s, in an environment where to even mention such a thing would have meant bullying and derision from students and teachers alike. I don't want children today to go through what I did. Trans kids (a very small minority, even today) deserve the same respect and support as any other kids. All kids are busy learning who they are as they grow, and they deserve a school system that supports and does not vilify them for that."}">I knew I was trans when I was a teenager in the 1980s, in an environment where to even mention such a thing would have meant bullying and derision from students and teachers alike. I don't want children today to go through what I did. Trans kids (a very small minority, even today) deserve the same respect and support as any other kids. All kids are busy learning who they are as they grow, and they deserve a school system that supports and does not vilify them for that.


Kids need help

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"Where can a child turn when parents are unsupportive and teachers are barred from helping?  \n\nI have a 13 year old trans-feminine niece living in Texas.  Her father insisted \"No son of mine is going to be a girl.\"  This took a terrible toll on her emotional stability.. She tried to commit suicide twice.  After getting psychological care, medical treatment, and school guidance, she is now a model student.  \n\nWithout supportive teachers, she would most certainly be dead today.   \n"}'>Where can a child turn when parents are unsupportive and teachers are barred from helping?

I have a 13 year old trans-feminine niece living in Texas. Her father insisted "No son of mine is going to be a girl." This took a terrible toll on her emotional stability.. She tried to commit suicide twice. After getting psychological care, medical treatment, and school guidance, she is now a model student.

Without supportive teachers, she would most certainly be dead today.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Trans youth are human beings. The governor needs to be concerned about guns, gun violence, gun safety, mental health issues, teacher pay, etc. and leave these young people alone. He’s proving, once again, how inept and unprepared he is to lead.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose the Governor's recommendation because it will harm trans and non-binary students and prevent teachers and administrators from providing help and guidance to them.


Support the care for children

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The new policies protect the fundamental religious liberty interests of students, personnel and parents. </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose these new guidelines. They purport to support parents, but are blatantly transphobic. They will harm trans students and make schools into spaces that are not safe for them. Every child is entitled to a safe and supportive environment in which to learn, and that includes trans children. I reiterate, I strongly oppose these new guidelines.


This is State-sponsored bullying

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"A teenage member of my family is currently exploring their gender and sexual identify.  As ALL teens do, they are figuring out who they are and how they fit in the world. And in the process, they are learning how the world treats those different identities and what adults they can trust.  Not all the adults in this particular teenager's life are supportive of letting them go through this age-appropriate period of exploration. Some family members and teachers make them feel unvalued or even unsafe. Youngkin's policy amounts to nothing more than state sponsored bullying.  It puts a target on these kids' backs and exposes the most vulnerable amongst our youth to disrespect, mistreatment, and abuse by adults who know that under this administration, they are allowed to behave that way towards kids like them. And it makes it impossible for kids like my family member to feel safe and supported in school - where they spend most of their life at this stage.  \nKids who identify as trans, non-binary, or gender-fluid are at extremely elevated risks of depression, anxiety, and suicide than their cisgender peers.  This isn't because of the gender identity itself, but a direct consequence of how society treats them and how much support from adults in their life they receive.  Youngkin's policy, thinly veiled by a \"parental rights\" mirage, will at best inflict serious damage to kids trying to figure out their minds and bodies, and at worst expose kids unlucky enough to have bad parents to abuse at home.  It's not just senseless - it's cruel.  "}">A teenage member of my family is currently exploring their gender and sexual identify. As ALL teens do, they are figuring out who they are and how they fit in the world. And in the process, they are learning how the world treats those different identities and what adults they can trust. Not all the adults in this particular teenager's life are supportive of letting them go through this age-appropriate period of exploration. Some family members and teachers make them feel unvalued or even unsafe. Youngkin's policy amounts to nothing more than state sponsored bullying. It puts a target on these kids' backs and exposes the most vulnerable amongst our youth to disrespect, mistreatment, and abuse by adults who know that under this administration, they are allowed to behave that way towards kids like them. And it makes it impossible for kids like my family member to feel safe and supported in school - where they spend most of their life at this stage.
Kids who identify as trans, non-binary, or gender-fluid are at extremely elevated risks of depression, anxiety, and suicide than their cisgender peers. This isn't because of the gender identity itself, but a direct consequence of how society treats them and how much support from adults in their life they receive. Youngkin's policy, thinly veiled by a "parental rights" mirage, will at best inflict serious damage to kids trying to figure out their minds and bodies, and at worst expose kids unlucky enough to have bad parents to abuse at home. It's not just senseless - it's cruel.


This is just awful nonsense.

<!DOCTYPE html>

It blows my mind that someone took the time to put together these model policies.  Someone out there in a position of power apparently refuses to call children something they are comfortable with, despite how little effort it is.  This person has decided it is not enough to bully these kids themselves, they want to force the school system into beating these kids down as well.  Because schools exists to bully children into what Glen Younkin thinks they should be, not grow and learn for themselves.

-Rowan, former FCPS student k-12 class of '17


No


I OPPOSE this policy. Protect trans kids.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I'm tired of having to hear the same old arguments trod out time and time again. Trans girls are girls. Trans boys are boys. At the very least give them the opportunity to not have to live in constant fear.


I OPPOSE the draft policy

It’s important that Virginia schools have safe and inclusive environments for LGBTQ+ youth. They need to have schools where each youth feels comfortable to learn and be the best version of themselves. Where they can be who they are, who they’re meant to be. The lives of these kids and young adults matter!!I OPPOSE the draft policy and want the VDOE to reject them.

<!DOCTYPE html>

It’s important that Virginia schools have safe and inclusive environments for LGBTQ+ youth. They need to have schools where each youth feels comfortable to learn and be the best version of themselves. Where they can be who they are, who they’re meant to be. The lives of these kids and young adults matter!!
I OPPOSE the draft policy and want the VDOE to reject them.


Strongly Support!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support parental rights, and I want our little girls to be safe when using the bathrooms and locker rooms at their school.  Prioritizing the desires of the trans community over the safety and dignity of the majority has already led to sexual violence in Virginia schools.  Return control of the schools to the parents and stop with the mandates!


Fully oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I fully oppose this policy which only stands to further harm already stigmatized youth. It’s shameful.


I support new pro-parent policies proposed by the Virginia Department of Education

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Allow parents to raise their children rather than the government.  Parents know their children's needs better than anyone.  If children are struggling with gender dysphoria, they need guidance and emotional support from parents.  These new policies keep parents fully informed, as should be.  </p>


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE the guidance trans and non-binary youth deserve our love, respect and protection


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Stop your attacks on our public schools and trans citizens! Schools are supposed to be safe spaces for children to learn. Not scary places where they can't be themselves. Keep the government out of these decisions.


Oppose

This commenter says it best:
“[these proposed] model education policies are a cynical political stunt that targetLGBTQ youth and undermine parents in the Commonwealth. They are antithetical to science and compassion and violate state and federal law. And make no mistake: these hastily prepared guidelines will hurt children.
In 2020, the General Assembly revised the Virginia Code to afford greater protections totransgender students in the Commonwealth. Sections 22.1-23.3 of the Virginia Coderequire the Department of Education to develop model policies that accord with“evidence-based best practices” and, among other things, comply with applicablenondiscrimination laws, protect student privacy, and maintain a safe and supportivelearning environment. Governor Youngkin’s model policies violate these legalobligations and fail to uphold the principles of dignity, equality, and privacy that are thefoundation of the law.And it is no wonder that Governor Youngkin’s policies are so odious—they were hastilyprepared with little input from parents, educators, students, and the public. This is incontrast to the prior version of the model policies, which were the product of a year-longprocess that relied upon input from an advisory committee of school-based personnelrepresenting diverse Superintendent’s Regions and disciplines, representatives fromstate professional associations, local businesses, advocacy organizations, parents,students, and specialists from the Virginia Department of Education. Rather thanlistening to the voices of the experts, educators, parents, and community, GovernorYoungkin took shortcuts to push out uniformed policies that turn the Commonwealth’sstudents into political pawns.Governor Youngkin’s policies also violates the Virginia Human Rights Act. To ensurethe rights and dignity of all citizens of the Commonwealth are respected, during the2020 legislative session Delegate Mark Sickles (D-Fairfax) and I drafted and passed theVirginia Values Act (SB868). This law was enacted with the support of businesses, faithleaders, parents, law enforcement, and citizens across Virginia who recognize andrespect their LGBTQ neighbors. The law amended the Virginia Human Rights Act (VACode § 2.2-3900) to make clear that it is the official policy of the Commonwealth to“safeguard all individuals within the Commonwealth from unlawful discriminationbecause of . . . sexual orientation [and] gender identity . . . in places of publicaccommodation, including educational institutions.” Under the Virginia Human RightsAct, conduct that violates any Virginia or federal law governing discrimination on thebasis of gender identity is an unlawful discriminatory practice.At the federal level, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 establishes that noperson can be discriminated against based on their sex in an educational setting thatreceives federal funding. And the Fourteenth Amendment to the United StatesConstitution guarantees all persons equal protection under the law. Federal courtshave confirmed that Title IX and the United States Constitution protect the rights oftransgender individuals. In Grimm v. Gloucester County, the Fourth Circuit Court ofAppeals relied upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. ClaytonCounty to uphold the rights of a transgender student to access educational facilities inaccordance with their gender. Governor Youngkin’s policies fly in the face of thisestablished federal law.The results of Governor Youngkin’s policies are stark. Students will be outed withouttheir consent. Rates of bullying and harassment of marginalized youth will increase.Students and parents will be required to jump through unnecessary legal hoops just sothat a student can be referred to by their proper name. Transgender youth who alreadyexperience drastically higher rates of suicide, depression, and homelessness will beplaced at further risk. These models policies will cause real, devastating harm.Our government should work to make our schools a place where all of Virginia’sstudents can learn and grow in a welcoming environment; that is not just what the lawrequires, it is what basic human dignity demands. The Virginia Department ofEducation must rescind these shameful proposed policies immediately for the good ofstudents, parents, and the entire Commonwealth.”

<!DOCTYPE html>

This commenter says it best:

“[these proposed] model education policies are a cynical political stunt that targetLGBTQ youth and undermine parents in the Commonwealth. They are antithetical to science and compassion and violate state and federal law. And make no mistake: these hastily prepared guidelines will hurt children.

In 2020, the General Assembly revised the Virginia Code to afford greater protections to
transgender students in the Commonwealth. Sections 22.1-23.3 of the Virginia Code
require the Department of Education to develop model policies that accord with
“evidence-based best practices” and, among other things, comply with applicable
nondiscrimination laws, protect student privacy, and maintain a safe and supportive
learning environment. Governor Youngkin’s model policies violate these legal
obligations and fail to uphold the principles of dignity, equality, and privacy that are the
foundation of the law.

And it is no wonder that Governor Youngkin’s policies are so odious—they were hastily
prepared with little input from parents, educators, students, and the public. This is in
contrast to the prior version of the model policies, which were the product of a year-long
process that relied upon input from an advisory committee of school-based personnel
representing diverse Superintendent’s Regions and disciplines, representatives from
state professional associations, local businesses, advocacy organizations, parents,
students, and specialists from the Virginia Department of Education. Rather than
listening to the voices of the experts, educators, parents, and community, Governor
Youngkin took shortcuts to push out uniformed policies that turn the Commonwealth’s
students into political pawns.

Governor Youngkin’s policies also violates the Virginia Human Rights Act. To ensure
the rights and dignity of all citizens of the Commonwealth are respected, during the
2020 legislative session Delegate Mark Sickles (D-Fairfax) and I drafted and passed the
Virginia Values Act (SB868). This law was enacted with the support of businesses, faith
leaders, parents, law enforcement, and citizens across Virginia who recognize and
respect their LGBTQ neighbors. The law amended the Virginia Human Rights Act (VA
Code § 2.2-3900) to make clear that it is the official policy of the Commonwealth to
“safeguard all individuals within the Commonwealth from unlawful discrimination
because of . . . sexual orientation [and] gender identity . . . in places of public
accommodation, including educational institutions.” Under the Virginia Human Rights
Act, conduct that violates any Virginia or federal law governing discrimination on the
basis of gender identity is an unlawful discriminatory practice.
At the federal level, Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 establishes that no
person can be discriminated against based on their sex in an educational setting that
receives federal funding. And the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States
Constitution guarantees all persons equal protection under the law. Federal courts
have confirmed that Title IX and the United States Constitution protect the rights of
transgender individuals. In Grimm v. Gloucester County, the Fourth Circuit Court of

Appeals relied upon the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bostock v. Clayton
County to uphold the rights of a transgender student to access educational facilities in
accordance with their gender. Governor Youngkin’s policies fly in the face of this
established federal law.

The results of Governor Youngkin’s policies are stark. Students will be outed without
their consent. Rates of bullying and harassment of marginalized youth will increase.
Students and parents will be required to jump through unnecessary legal hoops just so
that a student can be referred to by their proper name. Transgender youth who already
experience drastically higher rates of suicide, depression, and homelessness will be
placed at further risk. These models policies will cause real, devastating harm.
Our government should work to make our schools a place where all of Virginia’s
students can learn and grow in a welcoming environment; that is not just what the law
requires, it is what basic human dignity demands. The Virginia Department of
Education must rescind these shameful proposed policies immediately for the good of
students, parents, and the entire Commonwealth.”


Unconditionally Support

<!DOCTYPE html>

I unconditionally support Governor Youngkin’s rational, reasonable model policies for the treatment of transgender students. Parents alone should be responsible for raising their children, not “woke” school and government officials. The current state of affairs is nothing less than state-sanctioned child abuse. Wishing you were another gender, no matter your age, just doesn’t make it so.


Stop punishing children for your political views

<!DOCTYPE html>

I strongly oppose policies that seek to enforce biological gender lines against the wishes of children with gender dysphoria. Forcing children into certain bathrooms and sports rules will only serve to make them miserable and more socially isolated. It is the opposite of a social good. Just leave them alone. Their schools should be welcoming not hostile.


The proposed guidance is internally contradictory in several key places.

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the changes being proposed. They purport to protect persons from being forced to act in ways inconsistent with their personal beliefs, yet they only do so for those holding traditional, conservative beliefs. This new document compels persons holding non-traditional, liberal views of sex and gender to act inconsistently with their beliefs. Further it comes dangerously close to violating federal rights of transgender persons.

Paragraph G3 compels students to use the restroom that corresponds with their sex, EXCEPT when this conflicts with federal law. Grimm v. Gloucester County makes has enshrined the right of transgender students to use the bathroom that corresponds to their gender not their sex. I have difficulty understanding circumstances under which a transgender student could be compelled to use the restroom of their sex without violating the principles of Grimm! If the paragraph intends to allow transgender students to use bathrooms according to their gender, as required by Grimm, and to only direct non-transgender students to use bathrooms according to their sex, would it not be much more clear simply to say that?!

Paragraphs D4 and D6 would seem to be in fairly direct opposition to each other, paragraph 4 directing school personnel to call a student by their chosen name and pronouns if requested in writing. Paragraph 6 stating that school personnel will not be compelled to act against their personal beliefs. Clearly this conflict of rights is as yet unresolved in case law, and thus the proposed guidance is also contradictory and unclear, and as such inherently unhelpful.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

Our schools should be a safe place for all children. People who are trans/nonbinary are not a threat to others and should be treated with respect and dignity. I oppose this new guidance.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I absolutely oppose the proposal, this is a dog whistle and counter to the great things the state of Virginia is capable of.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose the Youngkin’s policy.


I oppose the model policy proposed by Gov Youngkin and the VDOE

I have a child who identifies as trans male. Although he knew we support the LGBTQ community, he struggled with his identity in middle school before he felt comfortable coming out to us. With our support and those of mental health professionals toward gender-affirming care, and the support of his high school toward transgender and non-binary youth (calling him by his chosen name and chosen pronouns), our son has felt more secure as his real self and feels supported by his high school and community. This acceptance is important to his well-being and all that will go away should the model policy go through. Children have a right to feel safe, to feel affirmed in whatever skin they most feel themselves, and to feel protected through laws that protect their rights. The proposed policies will take away the safety and protection that trans and non-binary youth have had in school and create a hostile and dangerous school environment. Once again these children will have to hide who they are and their mental health will deteriorate increasing their risk for an already high rate of self-harm or even suicide among trans and non-binary youth.This policy is meant to restrict restroom access and sports participation for transgender and nonbinary students. It will require faculty and staff to “out” trans and nonbinary students to their parents, and prohibit teachers and staff from supporting trans students one of the most important of which is using a student's affirming name and pronoun. Please do not allow these policies to go into effect. I know personally the devastation that anti-trans and anti non-binary policies will do to our children.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"I have a child who identifies as trans male.  Although he knew we support the LGBTQ community, he struggled with his identity in middle school before he felt comfortable coming out to us. With our support and those of mental health professionals toward gender-affirming care, and the support of his high school toward transgender and non-binary youth (calling him by his chosen name and chosen pronouns), our son has felt more secure as his real self and feels supported by his high school and community. This acceptance is important to his well-being and all that will go away should the model policy go through.    Children have a right to feel safe, to feel affirmed in whatever skin they most feel themselves, and to feel protected through laws that protect their rights.  The proposed policies will take away the safety and protection that trans and non-binary youth have had in school and create a hostile and dangerous school environment.  Once again these children will have to hide who they are and their mental health will deteriorate increasing their risk for an already high rate of self-harm or even suicide among trans and non-binary youth.\n\nThis policy is meant to restrict restroom access and sports participation for transgender and nonbinary students.  It will require faculty and staff to “out” trans and nonbinary students to their parents, and prohibit teachers and staff from supporting trans students one of the most important of which is using a student's affirming name and pronoun.  \n\nPlease do not allow these policies to go into effect.  I know personally the devastation that anti-trans and anti non-binary policies will do to our children."}">I have a child who identifies as trans male. Although he knew we support the LGBTQ community, he struggled with his identity in middle school before he felt comfortable coming out to us. With our support and those of mental health professionals toward gender-affirming care, and the support of his high school toward transgender and non-binary youth (calling him by his chosen name and chosen pronouns), our son has felt more secure as his real self and feels supported by his high school and community. This acceptance is important to his well-being and all that will go away should the model policy go through. Children have a right to feel safe, to feel affirmed in whatever skin they most feel themselves, and to feel protected through laws that protect their rights. The proposed policies will take away the safety and protection that trans and non-binary youth have had in school and create a hostile and dangerous school environment. Once again these children will have to hide who they are and their mental health will deteriorate increasing their risk for an already high rate of self-harm or even suicide among trans and non-binary youth.

This policy is meant to restrict restroom access and sports participation for transgender and nonbinary students. It will require faculty and staff to “out” trans and nonbinary students to their parents, and prohibit teachers and staff from supporting trans students one of the most important of which is using a student's affirming name and pronoun.

Please do not allow these policies to go into effect. I know personally the devastation that anti-trans and anti non-binary policies will do to our children.


As a transgender woman in Virginia.

<!DOCTYPE html>

As a trans woman who has lived in Virginia her whole life, I was hidden from what it meant to be trans for almost all of my childhood. I remember praying to God every day since the day I was 8 to wake up as a girl, a prayer that would never be answered. It wasn't until I was 15 years old and the last 7 years had worn me down to the point that I figured I'd rather be dead than live another year as a boy. It was then that I came out to my parents, who had a very, very bad reaction. I WILL NEVER FORGET what they said to me because their only knowledge of trans people was the vilified stories on late night news.That reaction would have been the end of my life if I hadn't met a trans boy at my school shortly after I came out to my parents. His teachers used his preferred name and pronouns, and all the guys I know treated him how they would treat any other boy at school. He was able to be authentic at school and that gave me hope. It helped me to keep moving forward and ultimately convinced me to keep living until I was 18 and free from my parents' control. The summer I graduated from high school, he helped me get to an endocrinologist to start hormone therapy. Six years later, I am doing better than I ever had before and I wouldn't even be alive if that trans man I met 8 years ago wasn't allowed to live his truth at school.


OPPOSE with all of my heart

<!DOCTYPE html>

The proposed policies are a fear-mongering, dog whistle distractions and a waste of time and resources. Allow and support children to grow into their unique selves. Offer safe space for children to explore and guidance to families who are reacting out of fear of the unknown.  Do not implement policies that will out transgender and non-binary children. Do not implement policies that will isolate and humiliate children who are learning to be whole humans.

Protect transgender and gender fluid children. The adults can and should handle their own fears with their therapists, not through controlling and manipulating children.  Do not implement the proposed fear-based policies.


Oppose


We Oppose the "Guidance"

As a parent to two transpeople, we have seen the devastation and depression that our young adults (now 20 & 24) faced as they each took their journey from their birth sex to their gender identity. Both kids were very different and remained different in how they shared with the world. They did not face much negative pressure from their peers, it was the adults who were the culprits and were not able to embrace them as they were. The microaggressions ranged from not getting their pronouns correct to not using their adopted names (legally changed). To this day we still get mail from their high school or colleges in the incorrect name. Our oldest who is the more private of the two didn't come out until college. They faced heavy depression in high school and do not like to discuss their transition with most people. It was not our business to know until they were ready to discuss it with us. They did blossom once they transitioned and took on leadership roles in their LGTBQ campus organization and even joined a fraternity that welcomed everyone.The younger one attended this year's Pride March in DC and has a rainbow bumper sticker and a boyfriend. They seem to be more comfortable in their skin. Their transition started earlier and has manifested in their own way from their personal style, interests, and friends. Grandparents from the midwest asked gentle questions and were more aware of the different steps to transition than we were at the beginning. They both had top surgery, use their adopted names, wear clothing of their gender and feel safe in some venues and fearful in others. We as parents fear for them quite a bit when they travel to certain states and in some situations. A few of their friends went by the wayside, and some friends asked weird questions, but our extended families embraced them in their true form. Why do we keep getting stuck on the topic of bathrooms? In schools, they are dangerous places where there is no adult supervision. A transgender person is much more at risk of violence TO THEM NOT FROM THEM. Virginia is a purple state where I thought having the ability to be independent was crucial. As long as someone isn't hurting someone else, remember we all have the right to choose the way we present to the world or what happens to our bodies. In this case, we know from our children that being trans isn't a choice, it's an innate feeling, who would choose a harder life?! We have amazing educational institutions, a flourishing economy, and a diverse population in the state of Virginia, let's embrace everyone. This "guidance" is wrong and the governor is not in touch with the majority of people, young and old, in our schools, in our military, and in this state/country. Back off Youngkin!

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"As a parent to two transpeople, we have seen the devastation and depression that our young adults (now 20 & 24) faced as they each took their journey from their birth sex to their gender identity.   Both kids were very different and remained different in how they shared with the world.  They did not face much negative pressure from their peers, it was the adults who were the culprits and were not able to embrace them as they were.  \n\nThe microaggressions ranged from not getting their pronouns correct to not using their adopted names (legally changed).  To this day we still get mail from their high school or colleges in the incorrect name.  Our oldest who is the more private of the two didn't come out until college.  They faced heavy depression in high school and do not like to discuss their transition with most people.  It was not our business to know until they were ready to discuss it with us.  They did blossom once they transitioned and took on leadership roles in their LGTBQ campus organization and even joined a fraternity that welcomed everyone.\n\nThe younger one attended this year's Pride March in DC and has a rainbow bumper sticker and a boyfriend.  They seem to be more comfortable in their skin.  Their transition started earlier and has manifested in their own way from their personal style, interests, and friends. Grandparents from the midwest asked gentle questions and were more aware of the different steps to transition than we were at the beginning.  They both had top surgery, use their adopted names, wear clothing of their gender and feel safe in some venues and fearful in others. \n\nWe as parents fear for them quite a bit when they travel to certain states and in some situations. A few of their friends went by the wayside, and some friends asked weird questions, but our extended families embraced them in their true form.  \n\nWhy do we keep getting stuck on the topic of bathrooms?  In schools, they are dangerous places where there is no adult supervision.  A transgender person is much more at risk of violence TO THEM NOT FROM THEM.  Virginia is a purple state where I thought having the ability to be independent was crucial. As long as someone isn't hurting someone else, remember we all have the right to choose the way we present to the world or what happens to our bodies.  \n\nIn this case, we know from our children that being trans isn't a choice, it's an innate feeling, who would choose a harder life?!  \n\nWe have amazing educational institutions, a flourishing economy, and a diverse population in the state of Virginia, let's embrace everyone.   This \"guidance\" is wrong and the governor is not in touch with the majority of people, young and old, in our schools, in our military, and in this state/country.  Back off Youngkin!"}">As a parent to two transpeople, we have seen the devastation and depression that our young adults (now 20 & 24) faced as they each took their journey from their birth sex to their gender identity. Both kids were very different and remained different in how they shared with the world. They did not face much negative pressure from their peers, it was the adults who were the culprits and were not able to embrace them as they were.

The microaggressions ranged from not getting their pronouns correct to not using their adopted names (legally changed). To this day we still get mail from their high school or colleges in the incorrect name. Our oldest who is the more private of the two didn't come out until college. They faced heavy depression in high school and do not like to discuss their transition with most people. It was not our business to know until they were ready to discuss it with us. They did blossom once they transitioned and took on leadership roles in their LGTBQ campus organization and even joined a fraternity that welcomed everyone.

The younger one attended this year's Pride March in DC and has a rainbow bumper sticker and a boyfriend. They seem to be more comfortable in their skin. Their transition started earlier and has manifested in their own way from their personal style, interests, and friends. Grandparents from the midwest asked gentle questions and were more aware of the different steps to transition than we were at the beginning. They both had top surgery, use their adopted names, wear clothing of their gender and feel safe in some venues and fearful in others.

We as parents fear for them quite a bit when they travel to certain states and in some situations. A few of their friends went by the wayside, and some friends asked weird questions, but our extended families embraced them in their true form.

Why do we keep getting stuck on the topic of bathrooms? In schools, they are dangerous places where there is no adult supervision. A transgender person is much more at risk of violence TO THEM NOT FROM THEM. Virginia is a purple state where I thought having the ability to be independent was crucial. As long as someone isn't hurting someone else, remember we all have the right to choose the way we present to the world or what happens to our bodies.

In this case, we know from our children that being trans isn't a choice, it's an innate feeling, who would choose a harder life?!

We have amazing educational institutions, a flourishing economy, and a diverse population in the state of Virginia, let's embrace everyone. This "guidance" is wrong and the governor is not in touch with the majority of people, young and old, in our schools, in our military, and in this state/country. Back off Youngkin!


I oppose this fully.


HIWASSEE TRANSGENDER VOLLEYBALL PLAYER SEVERELY INJURES FEMALE HIGH SCHOOLER WITH SPIKE TO THE FACE

<!DOCTYPE html>

Liberals are a disgrace.


I oppose this guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"As an educator and a parent of a transgender student in Virginia schools, I vehemently oppose these model policies. If adopted, they will discriminate against gender non-conforming students, and endanger their mental, emotional, and physical health. How can students focus on learning when they are not allowed to be who they are, when everything that makes them feel safe and welcome is taken away? I know that if staff were permitted to address my child by the wrong name and pronouns, and if my child was not permitted to use the facilities that align with her gender identity, my child would be traumatized, frightened, and unable to make it through a school day, let alone able to focus on her classes. This is not about parents' rights or religious rights; it's about the rights of all children to be respected and treated as a human being. Our schools have the responsibility to create safe and inclusive learning environments for ALL students. These model policies would do the opposite, and should be rejected by the VDOE."}">As an educator and a parent of a transgender student in Virginia schools, I vehemently oppose these model policies. If adopted, they will discriminate against gender non-conforming students, and endanger their mental, emotional, and physical health. How can students focus on learning when they are not allowed to be who they are, when everything that makes them feel safe and welcome is taken away? I know that if staff were permitted to address my child by the wrong name and pronouns, and if my child was not permitted to use the facilities that align with her gender identity, my child would be traumatized, frightened, and unable to make it through a school day, let alone able to focus on her classes. This is not about parents' rights or religious rights; it's about the rights of all children to be respected and treated as a human being. Our schools have the responsibility to create safe and inclusive learning environments for ALL students. These model policies would do the opposite, and should be rejected by the VDOE.


support parental rights


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE these new guidelines. This will affect trans students negatively and make them feel ostracized in a place where students should feel safe and accepted.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I vehemently OPPOSE the 2022 proposed model policy. This will only further endanger trans children, who are already at a higher risk of violence in and outside the home. As a trans person, I am disgusted by this policy. It will only lead to more violence, drug use, and death by suicide. You are actively creating an unsafe environment for at-risk youth and any harm caused to these innocent kids will be direct consequences of these policies."}'>I vehemently OPPOSE the 2022 proposed model policy. This will only further endanger trans children, who are already at a higher risk of violence in and outside the home. As a trans person, I am disgusted by this policy. It will only lead to more violence, drug use, and death by suicide. You are actively creating an unsafe environment for at-risk youth and any harm caused to these innocent kids will be direct consequences of these policies.


You are the best governor ever. Thank you Governor Youngkin!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Thank you for protecting our children.


You all have never played sports if you think locker rooms/showers at school are private areas.

<!DOCTYPE html>

One comment said schools should fill in the gap in stalls? Evidently these folks have never played sports. Simple solution- If you have balls use the boys room.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I wish 20+ years ago that the schools had been more understanding and accepting during my high school years. Regardless of the laws, we will not disappear!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I believe in our community. I believe in our trans youth and I know that by giving them the love respect and support that they are asking for, we can build them up instead of breaking them down. We can have a community of love kindness and support that allows our children the room to grow learn love and live. We are a community of LGBTQ+ supporters and we are not going to stay silent.


Educator opposed to draft model policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I am an educator at a Virginia public institution. I am also a mom to two young children who will attend Virginia public schools in a few years. I am vehemently opposed to this policy. The evidence is clear that this policy would cause harm to children in Virginia. We need schools that uplift and support all children. We also need to support schools and teachers, and not create policies that could drive teachers out of the profession. \n"}'>I am an educator at a Virginia public institution. I am also a mom to two young children who will attend Virginia public schools in a few years. I am vehemently opposed to this policy. The evidence is clear that this policy would cause harm to children in Virginia. We need schools that uplift and support all children. We also need to support schools and teachers, and not create policies that could drive teachers out of the profession.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

The governor's proposed changes to public school policies for trans and non-binary students are totally unnecessary, ridiculous, abusive, and terribly cruel. They should be trashed.


Ann Marie Barrett (LCPS counselor) arrested for sexually assaulting her transgender student

<!DOCTYPE html>

Keep the parents in the dark while teachers and counselors handle our children's sexuality in Loudoun County?


Strongly Oppose this Discriminatory, Dangerous, and Cruel Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

This policy goes against evidence-based practice, discriminates against trans-kids, endangers vulnerable children, imposes "forced outing" and is unbelievably cruel. This policy is based on fear-mongering as a strategy to manipulate people for political gain. It will create unsafe, inequitable, intolerable environments in our schools. This is a meaningless and unnecessary political stunt that targets children who are in most need of our protection and support -- and have a lot to offer all of us. This will damage our educators' ability to provide civil, respectful, and equal learning opportunities for our children. I am a graduate of James City County public schools and the College of William and Mary and am a homeowner in Chesterfield County. I am also mother of a Chesterfield County Public School graduate. I vehemently oppose this inhuman policy.


I am in favor of 2022 Model Policies on the Privacy, Dignity and Respect for All Students and Parent

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>The new policies honor the sacred role of parents in the care of their children during school, athletics and other activities. </p>


Youngkin and his transphobic agenda

<!DOCTYPE html>

All children should feel safe and welcomed in our public schools no matter how they identify in terms of gender or sexual preference.


Oppose


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"Throughout my grade school years I dealt with the concept of gender. Many of my friends were transgender or NB, and I am NB myself. I know from their testimony that they always felt much more accepted and happy in classes that supported their gender identity, preferred name, and pronouns. This policy would remove that opportunity of acceptance and understanding. Similarly, many people who identify as a gender separate from their sex do not share this information with their parents, caregivers, or families for the preservation of their mental, physical, and psychological wellbeing. The requirement of collaboration between the school and parents of the student would compromise this security. This could lead to parents having rash, cruel, or abusive reactions to learning of their child's gender identity. Despite the beliefs, traditions, or values of schools, staff, parents, or other students, the safety, acceptance, and proper nurturing of a student's mental and physical health should take top priority. It is imperative to assure students feel safe in their school and home environments. I do not support this change of policy."}">Throughout my grade school years I dealt with the concept of gender. Many of my friends were transgender or NB, and I am NB myself. I know from their testimony that they always felt much more accepted and happy in classes that supported their gender identity, preferred name, and pronouns. This policy would remove that opportunity of acceptance and understanding. Similarly, many people who identify as a gender separate from their sex do not share this information with their parents, caregivers, or families for the preservation of their mental, physical, and psychological wellbeing. The requirement of collaboration between the school and parents of the student would compromise this security. This could lead to parents having rash, cruel, or abusive reactions to learning of their child's gender identity. Despite the beliefs, traditions, or values of schools, staff, parents, or other students, the safety, acceptance, and proper nurturing of a student's mental and physical health should take top priority. It is imperative to assure students feel safe in their school and home environments. I do not support this change of policy.


Furries wear tails, leashes and collars to school but dress code prevents my son from wearing a hat

<!DOCTYPE html>

These liberal woke school districts are absolutely crazy. Shame on these school boards for creating this confused generation of people (and cats)


Parental Rights are Critical

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>Support the pro-parent policies! The new policies keep the role of parents paramount.  Parents care for their children is critical.  Religious liberty interests of personnel and students needs to be protected and the new policies do just that.  </p>


I am Firmly Against this Policy

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"As a parent with a child in the public school system, I strongly oppose this policy. Its effects would be damning to an already at-risk, vulnerable population of people who deserve to live and be recognized as whole humans in this state. It’s also invasive to personal privacy, anti-trans, and willfully deceptive in its language. It directly impacts individuals in my neighborhood, my communities and friend group. I’m raising my child to be open-minded and accepting of all individuals, your policy alienates not only trans people, but those who love and support them in all communities."}'>As a parent with a child in the public school system, I strongly oppose this policy. Its effects would be damning to an already at-risk, vulnerable population of people who deserve to live and be recognized as whole humans in this state. It’s also invasive to personal privacy, anti-trans, and willfully deceptive in its language. It directly impacts individuals in my neighborhood, my communities and friend group. I’m raising my child to be open-minded and accepting of all individuals, your policy alienates not only trans people, but those who love and support them in all communities.


I strongly oppose this guidance

<!DOCTYPE html>

My son has a trans friend. I do not believe that the government should have any role in erasing trans folks.


OPPOSE


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose Gov. Younkin’s guidance and support transgender youth. As a school counselor it is my job to protect students’ right to confidentiality, advocate for change, and provide them with a safe place to be themselves and learn. Lives will be at stake if this bill is passed. We need to protect and treat all people with kindness and acceptance.


This Antiquated Bill Proposal is Dangerous and Will Lead to More Harm Towards Children/ Teenagers.

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"As someone who is keenly aware of child abuse due to surviving it, and as someone who lived in an environment that was hostile to LGBTQIA+ adults and youth alike; I have enough experience to know that such policies will be detrimental to children's physical and mental health. Outing people especially children/ teenagers who cannot advocate for themselves will put them in harms way. This could lead to abuse from the parent if they are unsupportive. This bill may also may increase the rate of youths being forcibly evicted from their homes due to the bigotry and hostility of the parents. Such a bill will place children/ teens in an position where they have to risk abuse/ homelessness to find any semblance of support. Furthermore this bill will potentially ruin any sense of trust that these students would place in their educators. People are often less likely to be receptive to learning if they constantly have to watch their back or if they feel as if those responsible for their education do not have their safety/wellbeing in their heart.  My partner is a teacher, and the rapport he establishes with the students stem from their ability to trust that he would not place these kids in such harmful positions."}">As someone who is keenly aware of child abuse due to surviving it, and as someone who lived in an environment that was hostile to LGBTQIA+ adults and youth alike; I have enough experience to know that such policies will be detrimental to children's physical and mental health. Outing people especially children/ teenagers who cannot advocate for themselves will put them in harms way. This could lead to abuse from the parent if they are unsupportive. This bill may also may increase the rate of youths being forcibly evicted from their homes due to the bigotry and hostility of the parents. Such a bill will place children/ teens in an position where they have to risk abuse/ homelessness to find any semblance of support. Furthermore this bill will potentially ruin any sense of trust that these students would place in their educators. People are often less likely to be receptive to learning if they constantly have to watch their back or if they feel as if those responsible for their education do not have their safety/wellbeing in their heart. My partner is a teacher, and the rapport he establishes with the students stem from their ability to trust that he would not place these kids in such harmful positions.


Support!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

I'm totally on board with the new policies.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"I support transgender and non-binary policies which are vital to a healthy and inclusive society. I strongly oppose the new 2022 model policies on the treatment of transgender (trans) and non-binary youth in schools. Children should have the freedom to explore their gender identities in a safe environment without fear of harm or judgement. They should be protected from bullying and harassment. They should be made to feel equal and included. Policies like these undermine the progress we have made on this issue."}'>I support transgender and non-binary policies which are vital to a healthy and inclusive society. I strongly oppose the new 2022 model policies on the treatment of transgender (trans) and non-binary youth in schools. Children should have the freedom to explore their gender identities in a safe environment without fear of harm or judgement. They should be protected from bullying and harassment. They should be made to feel equal and included. Policies like these undermine the progress we have made on this issue.


<!DOCTYPE html>

Quit forcing Liberal Communist & Marxist policies on our kids! Protect #GirlsAndWomensRights FIRST!

I support 2022 policy by Youngkin!


Furries deserve respect! Stop the furryphobia;


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

I oppose Youngkin’s guidance!


I support parental rights in schools

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Glenn Youngkin's policies.


TRANSGENDER CHILDREN

<!DOCTYPE html>

I support Governor Youngkin's proposed changes to the Department of Education's regulations regarding the treatment of transgender children.  Schools should not be required to recognize a child's change of gender presentation; nor should they be required to use a child's preferred pronouns.  Children are still developing and finding themselves.  If they perceive gender dysphoria, they need compassion, emotional support, and counseling.  Parents need to be involved in helping their children through this.  But a child's (indeed, any person's) DNA shows what gender he/she is; he/she cannot be otherwise, no matter how much it is desired or believed.  Gender can't be undone.


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value='{"1":2,"2":"As a parent in Hanover County I was absolutely disgusted by the blatant attack on transgender and non-binary students by the county’s adoption of their absurd and discriminatory policy. Their antiquated ideas of what is “right” and “just” is disappointing and hurtful. I do not agree that this policy should be statewide. It should be put into the history books as quickly as possible. “Patriots”… you were alive back in Colonial times. It’s time you stopped trying to resurrect yourselves in 2022. Spread love and acceptance as Jesus would have you do."}'>As a parent in Hanover County I was absolutely disgusted by the blatant attack on transgender and non-binary students by the county’s adoption of their absurd and discriminatory policy. Their antiquated ideas of what is “right” and “just” is disappointing and hurtful. I do not agree that this policy should be statewide. It should be put into the history books as quickly as possible. “Patriots”… you were alive back in Colonial times. It’s time you stopped trying to resurrect yourselves in 2022. Spread love and acceptance as Jesus would have you do.


I support pro-parent policies

<!DOCTYPE html>

<p>I support pro-parent policies. As a mother-to-be, the responsibility should lie with parents and educators should enable students to have greater opportunities not in social structures that don’t align with parents but with basic educational standards and  with an unbiased and diverse approach. Enable diversity of thought, not desired social/spiritual/preferred constructs. </p>


STRONGLY OPPOSE!!!!

<!DOCTYPE html>

From WAPO:

If these so-called Christians want their children to be raised with their religious beliefs, then they should homeschool them or send them to religious schools. However, they won’t do that because they don’t want to make the necessary sacrifices. They’re “Christian” enough to try to impose their beliefs on everyone else, but not enough to give up the money or the time necessary to pay tuition or homeschool.


Protect trans kids—oppose government-sanctioned harm and control

<!DOCTYPE html>

I OPPOSE this guidance. There is only psychological and physical harm and death that will result from the governor’s proposal. Having grown up in VA public schools this guidance would have harmed and even killed many of my friends and classmates. The governor wants to pretend he’s protecting children when indeed he is causing untold damage to them, their loved ones, and families. SHAME.


STRONGLY SUPPORT THE NEW POLICIES

<!DOCTYPE html>

Our children's safety are depending on these policies. Let's protect them!


“Parental rights,” my butt!

<!DOCTYPE html>

Youngkin said during a recent interview: “We must have parents at the front of the line — not at the exclusion of a trusted teacher or counselor — but parents must be the first stop for these decisions.”

How shortsighted of you! Not all of us are so dumb to fall for this.

While this might work if the parents are loving and supportive,  but what if they aren’t? Then what? You may end up with blood on your hands.

What basis do you have to overrule all of the major psychological associations that have designed standards of care for trans minors over the last several decades?


Oppose- using our furry pronouns would be purrrrfect

<!DOCTYPE html>

Furries have rights too!


Oppose

<!DOCTYPE html>

<span data-sheets-userformat='{"2":769,"3":{"1":0},"11":4,"12":0}' data-sheets-value="{"1":2,"2":"My child is non-binary and my support of them and other trans individuals isn't just because I respect them as people, but also because I understand the importance of mental health.  Telling people, especially vulnerable youths, that their feelings... their identities... aren't important is detrimental to their well-being.  It's already a struggle to feel like you were put into the wrong body, but to not support these kids is to tell them that there's something mentally wrong with them.  It puts them at further risk for anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideations.  We need to be there for these kids, not force them into a downward spiral."}">My child is non-binary and my support of them and other trans individuals isn't just because I respect them as people, but also because I understand the importance of mental health. Telling people, especially vulnerable youths, that their feelings... their identities... aren't important is detrimental to their well-being. It's already a struggle to feel like you were put into the wrong body, but to not support these kids is to tell them that there's something mentally wrong with them. It puts them at further risk for anxiety, depression, and suicidal ideations. We need to be there for these kids, not force them into a downward spiral.